SIG’s people have worked long and hard to get the company to where it is today. But being the top dog means more than becoming the de facto standard of excellence to gun owners. It also means becoming the “X-ring” for everyone who takes aim at the industry.
Unfortunately, thanks to Hollywood, almost everyone in America — and indeed the world — is all too familiar with the whole concept of “warning shots.”
It seems the Supreme Court really doesn’t like to delve into the Second Amendment unless it really really has to.
Red flag laws have been presented as prudent solutions to the problem of violent crime, but any benefits come at the cost of individual due process protections, using an inherently speculative process that punishes individuals for harm that may never occur.
Today SIG SAUER has announced that they will no longer remain quiet in the face of lawsuits regarding the safety of the P320 pistol and will more vocally be stating their case in public.
CRPA and other pro-gun orgs argued that regardless of Mr. Allam’s particular facts, the law is facially unconstitutional because there is no sufficient historical tradition of expansive “buffer zones” around the few sensitive places that did exist in the past.
“Of course, she has issued some rulings I disagree with but I can say the same thing with all of the justices including Justices Thomas, Alito and Gorsuch.”
Some of the justices’ questions demonstrated that they did not all seem to fully understand how the industry legally conducts business. Here are a couple of examples.
The justices questioned if this case wasn’t a wholesale attempt to redefine Second Amendment rights altogether, and how Americans might be able to exercise their rights to keep and bear arms.
The justices repeatedly poked holes in Mexico’s argument, questioning whether it was plausible to accuse gun manufacturers of complicity in illegal sales without naming specific dealers or the specific sales in which they had allegedly participated.
