“I think it’s time to start having discussions, which will hopefully lead to the training necessary to safely own a handgun. So, how have you all handled approaching discussions with family members?”
If it’s “racist” to require voter ID, what do you call a CCW process that requires a police interview, training course, fingerprinting, sometimes a psych exam, as much as two years wait time, and costs up to $2,000?
While many in the gun community celebrated the feds indicting Michael Madigan, we should have been careful what we wished for, because in politics, the alternative can always be far worse.
It turns out, though, that billions of Bloomberg bucks and even more money from George and Alexander Soros weren’t enough for gun control advocates. They wanted taxpayer dollars, too.
While much of the national conversation on firearm rights revolves around self-defense and personal freedoms, Trump’s exeutive order carries significant implications for hunters.
While the EO is certainly welcome news, we’re prepared to wait and see what actually comes of this before setting off any fireworks or scheduling any celebration pub crawls.
The problem is that these huge spikes in sales have become the new standard by which we judge firearms sales, and anything that isn’t on a par with those spikes is somehow considered a downturn, a market softening, a slump.
Hogg has claimed the Second Amendment doesn’t protect an individual right to keep and bear arms. Apparently he slept through his Harvard history classesDa or he’d know SCOTUS has ruled otherwise three times now.
For many Dems the reaction to the new presidency is manifesting itself as a commitment to impede the democratically elected president and his allies, including stepped-up efforts to enact extreme gun control measures.
The DNC thinks their answer is David Hogg and all of the gun control baggage he carries with him. But even The New York Times couldn’t bring itself to dress up the DNC debacle for anything else other than what it is.
