DOJ and the Courts Say the NFA is a Tax…The Senate Parliamentarian Has No Choice But to Rule That Way, Too
At this point everyone following the National Firearms Act debate is well aware of then-Attorney General Cummings’ famous testimony in […]
At this point everyone following the National Firearms Act debate is well aware of then-Attorney General Cummings’ famous testimony in […]
The Senate’s move to gut large sections of the NFA is one of the most significant pro-gun reforms in nearly a century. But unless the holes are closed, gun owners could face legal limbo in anti-gun states and suppressor sales could stall at a critical moment.
Typically there’s some trade-off between reducing sound at the shooter’s ear and increasing downrange sound, but in the case of the ROC556L it was all-around one of the very quietest suppressed AR-15 setups we’ve shot.
Giffords’ push poll claims that the Hearing Protection Act would eliminate background checks on suppressor sales. That is an outright lie and Giffords knows it.
Anti-gun logic: Mass murderers use silencers (they don’t) so their victims can’t hear the gun shots (from bullets that go
The case revolves around Jamond M. Rush, who was charged with being in possession of an unregistered SBR. He has been convicted and sentenced to 30 months in prison “for possessing a firearm that is in common use for lawful purposes.”
As the U.S. Senate begins work on the House-passed reconciliation bill—cheekily dubbed the “One Big Beautiful Bill,” gun owners nationwide
“If we doubled it, if we just went to $400, you could sell only half as many and not lose a penny in revenue. If we tripled it, you might actually discourage some sales of silencers. Wouldn’t that be a good thing for us to be doing in this committee?”