Kamala Harris Has Been Intentionally Vague About Her Stance on Gun Confiscation
It’s clear that Kamala Harris still supports gun confiscation and is a threat to the rights of all law-abiding gun owners.
It’s clear that Kamala Harris still supports gun confiscation and is a threat to the rights of all law-abiding gun owners.
The core claim: A firearm in the home significantly increases the risk of suicide, homicide, death during domestic disputes, and
DeSantis announced on social media Monday that “The State of Florida will be conducting its own investigation regarding the attempted assassination at Trump International Golf Club.”
It seems that murdering 12 people and then committing suicide isn’t interesting enough for the anti-gun droogs at Moms Demand Action to build a nice, juicy narrative-reinforcing post around.
[Ryan Wesley] Routh faced criminal charges in North Carolina for two separate incidents, in April and December 2002. According to the
Today, gun control activists falsely assert the 1994 “assault weapons” ban totally worked and so we should enact another one. But they knew that wasn’t true in 2004 and they know it now.
Scholars call ammo the “actual agent of harm” in gun violence. Criminals don’t have to be good shots, or worry about how much ammo they burn through. Without the ammo, the gun is just an empty vessel.
As for the constitutionality of banning “assault weapons,” good luck with that, Ms. Harris. There’s literally no text, history, or tradition in this country of banning civilian possession of firearms that have been actual weapons of war.
The lesson for anti-gunners and federal level Democrats should be that nothing makes an American want something more than the government telling them they can’t have it.
Gather round, folks, because today we’re going to do a deep dive into gun control history. Today is the 20th