In June, a survivor of the 2018 Marjory Stoneman Douglas high school shooting in Parkland, Florida, was granted copyright over the shooter’s name, thereby preventing its reproduction without permission.
The Supreme Court on Tuesday overturned a lower court ruling from Pennsylvania that allowed residents under 21 to carry firearms in public, though the justices declined for now to hear arguments in the case themselves.
The Texas senator has spearheaded — along with other far-right Congress members like Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene — an amicus brief, or friend-of-the-court filing, that reads more a friend-of-the-gun-industry beef.
The Bloomberg anti-gun group Everytown for Gun Safety has posted a defense of the impracticable microstamping technology on its The Smoking Gun web site. The article has enough glaring errors and omissions that a response is warranted.
A federal district court judge has ruled New York’s restriction against concealed carry on private property open to the public is unconstitutional, handing a victory to the Second Amendment Foundation in a case known as Christian v. James.
The justices spent much of the oral argument grappling — in sometimes colorful and humorous terms — with when a
A cap gun is an example of [a firearm]. It — it expels bird shot, and so, therefore, it would fit within the functional definition. But it’s not a weapon because it’s not an instrument of combat or intended to be used in that way.
Joining LKB to break down the arguments in VanDerStok were Independent Institute senior fellow Steven Halbrook, California Rifle & Pistol Association President Chuck Michel and NRA-ILA Director of Constitutional Studies Joseph Greenlee.
Two stories that have managed to stay alive far longer than anyone expected are the sale of Vista Outdoor and
“Absent this court’s intervention,” the gun makers’ petition continued, “Mexico’s multibillion-dollar suit will hang over the American firearms industry for years, inflicting costly and intrusive discovery at the hands of a foreign sovereign.”
