Brady and Giffords: Guns Must Be Banned Where Free Speech and Religion Are Practiced
“To preserve our democracy through peaceful civil engagement, states must be able to appropriately regulate firearms in modern First Amendment-protected spaces.”
“To preserve our democracy through peaceful civil engagement, states must be able to appropriately regulate firearms in modern First Amendment-protected spaces.”
Today the Third Circuit reaffirmed its earlier finding that someone who commits a “nonviolent, nondangerous misdemeanor” and hasn’t been incarcerated can’t be deprived of his Second Amendment rights.
“The magazines at issue in this case are not ‘dangerous and unusual,’ but instead are standard components of the sorts of bearable arms in common use for lawful purposes,” the lawsuit argues.
In the mind of the New York Giants, the New York City subway system was too dangerous for its star quarterback. If that’s the case, how is the average New Yorker or tourist expected to fare when they head underground?
One doesn’t have to look very far to see that activist lawfare that intentionally distorts the law’s meaning and intent remains a popular way for the far left to pursue its agenda of ending civilian gun ownership in America.
“The second Bruen came down, there was the starting gun for a sprint, for which we have not stopped yet,” Bill Sack, director of legal operations for SAF told Stateline. “Stuff is ripe for a fresh challenge.”
It the latest salvo of lawfare launched against a lawful firearm manufacturer, New Jersey’s enthusiastically hoplophobic Attorney General, Matt Platkin, announced yesterday that he had filed suit against GLOCK for…making guns.
AG James aconvinced Judge Joel Cohen to mandate governance and compliance measures that go far beyond any “oversight” that was exercised during the 30-year tenure of Wayne LaPierre and his band of sycophants.
In the grand tradition of paying public relations people to make virtually any noteworthy event sound like a good thing, both the Attorney General and the NRA are painting the final outcome of this years-long epic battle as a win.
When a juror votes “not guilty” because they don’t agree with the law in question or they believe the defendant is being unjustly prosecuted, the prosecution, the judge and sometimes the media lose their collective mind.