All the Right People are Panicking That Non-Violent Felons Could Have Their Gun Rights Restored

woman scream fear vintage cartoon

For decades, the federal government has done something that should outrage every freedom-loving American: It has treated the Second Amendment like a lifetime privilege that can be revoked forever,  even for non-violent offenses.

Now, that may finally be changing.

A Long-Overdue Course Correction

The Department of Justice is preparing to revive a long-dormant program that would allow non-violent felons to apply to have their gun rights restored — something that hasn’t meaningfully existed for over 30 years.

That’s right. For the first time in decades, millions of Americans who . . .

  • Paid their debt to society
  • Stayed out of trouble
  • Rebuilt their lives

…could finally have a pathway to reclaim their constitutional rights. And not just any right, the right to keep and bear arms.

Here’s what most Americans don’t know:

Federal law has always allowed for restoration of gun rights under a provision known as 18 U.S.C. § 925(c), but Congress effectively killed the program in the early 1990s by cutting off funding. So for over three decades, the system has worked like this:

You commit a non-violent felony…and you lose your Second Amendment rights for life, no matter what.

No review. No second chance. No due process.

Millions Could Be Eligible

Under the new plan . . .

  • Individuals with non-violent felony convictions — including things like drug offenses or financial crimes — could apply to have their rights restored.
  • Applicants would have to show:
    1. A history of lawful behavior
    2. Evidence of rehabilitation
    3. No ongoing threat to public safety

In other words, individualized review…not blanket punishment. What a concept.

The Gun Control Lobby Is Panicking

Of course, the gun confiscation cartel is already melting down. They’re claiming this will, “make communities less safe,” and, “put guns in dangerous hands.”

But here’s what they won’t tell you: this system already existed. And the Constitution never said: “Shall not be infringed…unless a bureaucrat says so forever.”

This Is About More Than Gun Rights

At its core, this fight is about something bigger…do Americans get a second chance, or not? Because if the government can permanently strip one constitutional right, it can justify stripping them all. Speech. Due process. Self-defense. All on the chopping block.

The Real Test Is Still Ahead

Now, don’t get ahead of yourself. This isn’t a full repeal of unconstitutional gun bans. It’s a step — a crack in the system. And like everything in Washington, the devil will be in the details.

How strict will the process be?
Who actually gets approved?
Will bureaucrats drag their feet?

But one thing is clear. For the first time in decades, the conversation is shifting from, “You lost your rights forever,” to, “Prove you’re not dangerous and get them back.”

That’s not radical. That’s what the Constitution demands.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

6 thoughts on “All the Right People are Panicking That Non-Violent Felons Could Have Their Gun Rights Restored”

  1. .40 cal Booger

    DOJ just blew up a 99 year old gun ban — media ain’t talking about this one.

    “For nearly 100 years, the federal government treated your handgun like contraband in the mail.

    That just changed.

    In this video, we break down a massive development: the Department of Justice’s Office of Legal Counsel has declared the 1927 handgun mailing ban unconstitutional — and the U.S. Postal Service is now moving to allow lawful handgun shipping under a proposed rule.

    This is a major Second Amendment shift that most mainstream outlets barely covered.

    We’ll walk through:
    • What the DOJ actually said
    • What the new USPS rule allows (and what it doesn’t)
    • How this affects everyday gun owners
    • Why the current system has been a dead end for lawful citizens
    • The pushback from anti-gun states — and why those arguments fall apart

    ⚠️ IMPORTANT: This rule is NOT final yet.

    The public comment period is open — and it closes May 4th.

    If you support this change, you can make your voice heard:

    📧 Email: PCFederalRegister@usps.gov
    Subject line: “Shipping Firearms”
    Include your name and mailing address in the body
    Tell them you support the proposed rule and that the 1927 ban is long overdue to be removed

    It takes 5 minutes — and it matters.

    If you don’t speak up, the other side will.”

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9SUrW9TvGUI

    1. When the U S P S begins accepting guns for shipment it is best to use ‘registered’ mail. Registered is ‘insured’ first class mail and a value of the item must be declared when mailing.
      The piece can be registered for the minimum amount. Proof of value can be a sales receipt, magazine ad etc that reflects the value. Keep in mind that if the piece is valued at, e.g., $2000 and you register it for the minimum and should the piece be lost etc then the amount the piece was registered for is the maximum collectable when a claim is made. I have been retired 31 years and things may have changed. Check with your local post office for possible updates/changes.

  2. .40 cal Booger

    School shooter stopped by school principal but not with a gun in a very rare success – armed only with bare hands: A School Shooter Thought He Would Kill Children – This Heroic Principal Had Other Ideas.

    “An Oklahoma school principal on Tuesday saved untold numbers of lives after he put himself on the line to stop a school shooter.

    The incident occurred at Pauls Valley High School, according to Fox News:

    An Oklahoma principal who was shot in the leg while tackling a school shooter on Tuesday was hailed a hero for stopping the gunman and preventing a worse tragedy, officials said.

    Pauls Valley High School Principal Kirk Moore and other staff spotted the gunman, later identified as 20-year-old former student Victor Hawkins, and immediately jumped into action to subdue him, according to the Oklahoma State Bureau of Investigation (OSBI).

    ‘The principal of the school had noticed that an adult male subject, 20 years old, had stepped foot into the school with a gun,’ OSBI spokesperson Hunter McKee told KOCO-TV. ‘When the principal noticed this, he quickly stepped in, as well as other staff. The subject was able to fire multiple rounds, where the principal was hurt, but no one else was.’

    Moore was airlifted to a hospital in stable condition, authorities said.

    ‘The actions of the staff and the principal stepping in as soon as they saw a subject with a firearm saved lives today,’ McKee told the outlet.

    The shooting unfolded around 2:21 p.m., according to authorities. The school was placed on lockdown until officers cleared the scene, and students were later reunited with their families.
    …”

    ht* tps://townhall.com/tipsheet/jeff-charles/2026/04/09/oklahoma-principle-shot-while-tackling-school-shooter-n2674166

  3. Given the gun control folks are exclusively Democrats and the people supporting no-cash bail, diversion type sentences, letting illegals run rampant and legalizing all the drugs are also Democrats forgive me for not buying into their fake concern.

  4. Geoff "I'm getting too old for this shit" PR

    “Under the new plan . . .

    Individuals with non-violent felony convictions — including things like drug offenses or financial crimes — could apply to have their rights restored.”

    What’s this ‘apply’ bullshit?

    I’ve said for over 10 years here and in TTAG before that if we ever won BIG in gun rights, the Leftist Scum ™ would respond by making as many things a felony as possible. ‘Bruen’ was the big win.

    SCotUS justice Coney-Barret has already said the non-violent should never lose their gun rights IN THE FIRST PLACE…

    1. “SCotUS justice Coney-Barret has already said the non-violent should never lose their gun rights IN THE FIRST PLACE…”

      Thinking that if person is convicted of a felony, any felony, involving free speech, (like the proverbial “yelling ‘FIRE’ in a crowded theater”) should lose their First Amendment rights, permanently. * Or, a person convicted of a felony should forfeit their right to jury trial, permanently.

      * Yes, it is perfectly legal to yell, “FIRE” in a crowded theater, if a fire actually exists.

Scroll to Top