By Any Means Necessary: Gun Rights Orgs Countering Anti-Gunners’ Worst Instincts
It never ceases to amaze me at the epic level of hypocrisy that comes from the gun-grabbing left. The group […]
It never ceases to amaze me at the epic level of hypocrisy that comes from the gun-grabbing left. The group […]
Former President Obama can feign frustration over cancel culture all he wants, but Kimmel’s suspension is a poor example of it, and he should know. He weaponized cancel culture in the first place.
“The failure of policy does not just evidence abdication; it reveals a lack of imagination and a diminished sense of what is possible and promised.”
Whatever his 2028 plans, it’s highly likely that Newsom will sign the unconstitutional AB1127 gun ban bill into law. That would certainly placate the gun control industry activists in his political base.
The calls for more restrictions on law-abiding Americans’ Second Amendment rights by gun control activists in the aftermath of a tragedy aren’t surprising or new.
After a simple, cursory examination of the Johns Hopkins survey, the final product makes more sense. It’s a gun control product performed by gun control advocates.
In addition to signaling a momentous shift in how the federal government views the constitutional right to keep and bear arms, the DOJ’s participation is particularly meaningful because similar bans are being litigated in other states.
Gavin Newsom and his political allies released a violent monster onto our streets, then used the perfectly predictable crimes he committed as pretext to further limit the rights of good, law-abiding people.
If citizens can’t count on courts or policymakers to prioritize their safety, they’re left to their own devices when situational awareness is simply not enough.
“If I ever get killed by one of these right wingers politicize the fuck out of my death immediately.”