After Trump Cuts BSCA Funds to Anti-Gun Orgs, Bloomberg’s Everytown Steps in to Fill the Void
Washington’s swamp never runs out of ways to waste your money. But this time, for once, a major artery of […]
Washington’s swamp never runs out of ways to waste your money. But this time, for once, a major artery of […]
The law should be simple: if you can lawfully own a firearm, you should be able to own a suppressor, an SBR, or SBS without begging for government approval or paying for a permission slip that no longer even collects revenue.
If they can strip suppressors of constitutional protection, what’s to stop them from doing the same with magazines, triggers, or optics? Once they declare something “nonessential,” the floodgates open for regulation, registration, and confiscation.
According to the criminal complaint, Avissar described the trigger as a “conversion device” after someone at a local gun range reported him to law enforcement following an attempt to use a 3D-printed FRT at the facility.
Bondi’s DOJ didn’t hesitate to double down and defend the unconstitutional interstate handgun sales ban — just as they recently did with Biden’s tyrannical “Engaged in the Business” rule, the backdoor gun registry cooked up by John Cornyn’s BSCA.
This entire scheme is the spawn of John Cornyn’s Bipartisan Safer Communities Act, drafted with anti-gun Democrat Chris Murphy. Cornyn handed Biden the legislative keys to create a backdoor registry — and Bondi is keeping it alive.
If one president can unilaterally infringe, another can do it again. The only way to stop the cycle is to abolish every executive gun control order and restore lawmaking power to Congress where it belongs.
If America wants to stop the violence, it must expose these lies, hold extremists accountable, and defend the rights of peaceful gun owners. Because anything less isn’t “justice.” It’s political theater at the expense of lives and liberty.
Gun owners must remain vigilant, even when “our side” is in charge. Trump may be friendly to the 2A, and his actions may be well-intentioned, but this lawsuit reminds us that political loyalty is no substitute for constitutional fidelity — and no one is perfect.
No serious supporter of constitutional rights believes in taxing them, regulating them out of existence, or shifting control over them to bureaucratic fiat. Yet Newsom has done all of that—and is positioning himself to do more on a national stage.