Magical Thinking: Gun-Free ‘Sensitive Places’ Laws Only Endanger the Law-Abiding
If citizens can’t count on courts or policymakers to prioritize their safety, they’re left to their own devices when situational awareness is simply not enough.
If citizens can’t count on courts or policymakers to prioritize their safety, they’re left to their own devices when situational awareness is simply not enough.
If a journalist wants to show that the work the commission produced is deficient, maybe she should use voices more potent than an aging thespian and a physician with an axe to grind to support her narrative.
The judge’s remark, perhaps unintentionally, casts aspersions on tens of millions of law-abiding gun owners who own firearms for personal protection and the defense of their families and other loved ones.
The assassination of Charlie Kirk hits hard, not only because I’m a 33-year-old married man hoping to start a family, but also as a man of faith who attended university at various levels.
Once the government assumes the authority to decide which categories of people may or may not exercise a constitutional right, the door is opened for future anti-gun administrations to expand those categories.
Charlie Kirk really did just want to talk. Yes, he was controversial and skilled at stirring the pot, but he believed if we just talked stuff out, we’d make it.
One day later, after their refusal, a very senior executive from J.P. Morgan Wealth Management reached back out to Silencer Central CEO Brandon Maddox to explain that they do, in fact, want to do business.
I found myself wearing them in public. I mean, I’m married, I’m a dad, I have nothing to prove, and I’m obviously a fashion trendsetter. So…why not?
Red state governors are not the ones setting local law enforcement priorities, budgets and policies, and the murder rate in each state is “largely a function of the large number of murders in a state’s biggest city or cities.”
What J.P. Morgan Wealth Management is doing is dumbfounding. Comptroller of the Currency Gould left no uncertainty that banking discrimination for “woke” political ideologies is a tainted remnant of the past.