It Appears the Supreme Court is Likely to Let Marijuana Users Own Guns
Chief Justice John Roberts appeared skeptical that courts should assess whether individual drug users are, in fact, dangerous enough to be disarmed.
Chief Justice John Roberts appeared skeptical that courts should assess whether individual drug users are, in fact, dangerous enough to be disarmed.
The relevant conduct and hardware are already covered by the law. What this latest legislation seeks to ban is the more metaphysical concept of potentiality.
It was a full-blown multi-agency SWAT extravaganza, complete with a shelter-in-place order for an entire neighborhood.
A gunman accused of shooting dead a world-famous Caltech genius last week was let out of jail just two months
“James Uthmeier is the most intellectually honest Attorney General we’ve ever had in Florida, while I have practiced law in the state.”
The same playbook shows up in attacks on science-based wildlife management and, ultimately, on lawful hunting.
What will decide that is whether guns continue to build cultural momentum and whether the courts get involved.
Maybe there was nothing SCOTUS could do back in 2015 with a 5-4 court with a squish like Justice Kennedy who didn’t want to go any further than Heller did. But now, since 2020, the votes should be there.
Pro-illegal politicians care more about their woke reputations than protecting innocent families. They’ve demonstrated that time and time again.
Welcome to another day of the Trump 2.0 presidency featuring another basement-dwelling social misfit deciding to beat his chest online