Supreme Court Won’t Hear Challenge to Illinois ‘Assault Weapons’ Ban…Yet
Earlier today, the Supreme Court denied cert in Barnett v. Raoul, a case challenging Illinois’ “assault weapons” ban and magazine […]
Law and the Courts
What Exactly Was Decided in the P320 Verdict Against SIG SAUER?
You may have heard about a recent jury verdict against SIG SAUER. If you haven’t, a federal court in Georgia
Highland Park Shooting Victim’s Family Sues Smith & Wesson, Bud’s Guns
A family of one of the seven victims killed in the Highland Park July 4th Parade shooting in 2022 has
Understanding What the Loper Bright and Jarkesy Regulatory Earthquake Means for Gun Owners
As Dan posted yesterday, the Supreme Court has decided Loper Bright v. Raimondo, and in so doing has officially overruled
BREAKING: Supreme Court Overrules Chevron Deference, Dealing a Body Blow to ATF Regulatory Power
Imagine if the ATF decided that gun makers had to pay for their agents to monitor compliance in every firearms
Delaware Changing Definition of “Firearm”
Much to the surprise of the Shooting News Weekly team, it turns out that Delaware is one step closer to
California’s Broader Protection Orders Likely Won’t Stand Up, Even After Rahimi
The [Rahimi] decision, however, does not validate all restraining order statutes. Consider, for instance, California Code of Civil Procedure § 527.6;
After Rahimi, Bruen Remains Tanned, Rested, and Ready for Future Cases
By focusing on Rahimi’s “dangerous” conduct, the high court did not foreclose a series of other challenges to federal disarmament
The Contorted Rahimi Ruling Didn’t Damage Bruen as Anti-Gunners Had Hoped
Today’s narrow Supreme Court decision in Rahimi failed to produce the damage the anti-gun crowd hoped for against Bruen. The