The FBI botched its investigation of the 2017 congressional baseball shooting — downplaying the gunman’s anti-GOP motives despite having handwritten evidence, a […]
This defensive gun use, which, from the very brief description in the report, sounds justified, presents a number of issues given Illinois’ overbearing gun laws.
The ATF, federal prosecutors, and what’s left of Joe Biden’s supporters in the fedgov still want you to believe that their case against Patrick “Tate” Adamiak is complex and confusing, involving arcane weapon systems and rare gun parts that only a firearm expert can fully understand.
Discussing the current incident with the Sun Times, Wintemute acknowledged his earlier findings, telling the paper, “When somebody asks me should we do a buyback, my response is that it depends on what you’re hoping to accomplish… If you think it will reduce rates of crime, go back to the drawing board.”
Perhaps the biggest factor that demonstrated that Adamiak’s RPGs were not weapons but training aids were massive holes drilled in the high-pressure area of the tubes – right where an operator’s face would be when firing them.
Ironically, although the dropped federal NFA charge had required the government to argue the braced CZ Scorpion was a rifle, the charge Taranto is still facing under D.C. law required it to argue the same firearm is a handgun.
Truth be known, Attorney General Pam Bondi or her staff should examine all of the ATF’s cases made during Biden’s term. Some were much worse than this one.
The two prosecutors and the ATF’s Bodell tried to penalize Adamiak for the flats, despite a 15-year-old ruling that says the flats are not firearms. The judge in that case even ruled, “The court finds that…selling flats is not illegal conduct.”
HPD patrol officers responded to a home invasion call at an apartment complex at the above address and were told by witnesses that three males attempted to get into an apartment.
You’re probably thinking, ‘Wait, what about the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act? Doesn’t that protect firearms manufacturers from liability when their highly regulated, lawfully produces and sold products are later used by criminals?’
