Kamala Harris Has Made the Choice in Tomorrow’s Election Easy for Gun Owners
Kamala Harris has made it an easy choice for gun owners on November 5. Harris has a decades-long track record […]
Kamala Harris has made it an easy choice for gun owners on November 5. Harris has a decades-long track record […]
After his initial conspicuous hesitation in backing Vice President Harris’ campaign, gun control impresario Michael Bloomberg has jumped in at the last minute to provide a financial shot in the arm over the final weeks.
“Trump has already shown his preference for appointing judges, including Supreme Court justices, who adhere to the Constitution and the next four years are certain to provide more opportunities to fill important vacancies.”
Kamala Harris is levying wild accusations that a former president who protected Second Amendment rights would suddenly become its greatest villain. And she’s doing it with a distinctly racist twist.
Maybe the Veep should brush up on what the president is in fact allowed to do through executive actions under the Constitution while facing checks and balances as the Founding Fathers intended.
There isn’t “anything about her record that is particularly impressive, and … more generally what we are seeing in the polls is that voters are beginning to understand that there is really no there there with Kamala Harris,” he said.
Giffords is only the latest example and the breathless hyperbole and hypocrisy coming out of their press releases and campaign emails makes it abundantly clear. They are hypocrites.
Since the lawmakers couldn’t make an end-run around the Court, their plan now is to “reimagine” it, not as a co-equal branch of government but one that’s subservient to the legislative branch’s whims.
YouTube’s rules are intentionally vague, making it effectively impossible to know what is and is not acceptable if there’s a firearm in your video. Worse, YouTube is constantly reinterpreting its own policies and then applying new “rulings” retroactively.
A professor quoted in the RCI article points out that such changes are quite unusual: the FBI had “no revisions from 2004 to 2015, and from 2016 to 2020, there were small changes of less than one percentage point.