There Are No ‘Moderate’ Democrats When it Comes to Gun Rights
Gov. Spanberger might have lied about how she intends to govern, but the numbers don’t.
Gov. Spanberger might have lied about how she intends to govern, but the numbers don’t.
Maybe the prospect of the Bloomberg School, that’s named for America’s most prominent gun-grabber, handing out locks provided by the gun industry is more than anyone at Johns Hopkins can handle.
The entire premise of Canada’s confiscation scheme would be laughable if it didn’t demonstrate how utterly unserious its elected officials are about public safety.
Senator Warren and Rep. Meeks invoked their oversight authority to demand a sweeping accounting of semi-automatic firearm export licenses approved since January 2025.
If Chapman had been put behind bars years ago for illegally supplying three different firearms to would-be criminals, it’s highly likely innocent Americans — such as Lt. Col. Shah — would still be alive today.
These states are doing it right. They show what can be accomplished when outdoor, hunting and shooting community members all partner to manage wildlife populations.
In gun control strongholds across the country, antigun politicians continue to prove they believe armed security is a necessity for those in power and a problem for everyone else.
Wayne Pacelle, the disgraced anti-hunting activist who previously resigned following sexual harassment allegations and grifter who was once head of the anti-hunting
Senate Democrats have already proved they are willing to move one of the broadest firearm restriction bills of the session. But the fight isn’t over.
Fewer firearm thefts mean fewer illegally obtained firearms in the hands of criminals who would misuse them to commit acts of violence.