Does Justice Sotomayor really want to know what the remedy would be if the government confiscated everyone’s gun? This remedy would not involve Rule 23.
According to court documents, the club accuses the two of “deliberately ignoring, subverting and obstructing” the recent court order, and for “obstructing and preventing, deliberately and maliciously” the club’s access to the firing ranges.
The procedural contortions in these various ongoing magazine ban cases grow more grating with each case. Recall that the U.S. Supreme Court rejected taking up the magazine ban issue in a Seventh Circuit ruling arising from an Illinois law.
How was Tate Adamiak sentenced to serve 20 years in prison? Simple. Prosecutors and the court relied upon federal sentencing guidelines to determine how long he would spend behind bars, even though nothing found in his home was actually illegal.
SCOTUS refusing to take a challenge to a FOID Card scheme in Illinois would effectively mean that the US Supreme Court doesn’t have a problem with licensing people to exercise a fundamental constitutional right.
Since the forced reset trigger devices will not be considered firearms, they can be purchased anonymously, without a background or age check.
That a former president would sue the nonprofit association for back pay while touting her “virtue” for not selling out to gun control groups says more than she might realize.
According to new legal documents not yet filed by the gun club, which may seek a contempt order from the judge, Fort Devens commander and a civilian Department of Defense lawyer are personally responsible for ruining their range day.
During the public comment period, MacIntosh urged commissioners to make a statement opposing anti-government extremists, a few weeks after the U.S. Capitol riot. That’s when Clous left the screen and returned with a rifle.
We need a Supreme Court that is willing to actively police the hostile circuits and summarily reverse them frequently. We also need Judge VanDyke to become Justice VanDyke.
