For Anti-Gunners, Any Dead Body is a Good Excuse for More Restrictions on Americans’ Gun Rights
If you show up to a Democrat run event and are shot and killed by security guards organized by Democrats, […]
If you show up to a Democrat run event and are shot and killed by security guards organized by Democrats, […]
The persistent efforts by anti-gun Democrats underscore their commitment to altering Texas’s political alignment, which could have significant implications for national gun control legislation.
Oh no…gun-hating sheriffs in the Tarheel State would no longer have the means to discriminate against disfavored people and classes when it comes to processing applications in a timely manner.
On the Court’s logic, ATF could at any time declare AR–15s to be machineguns prohibited by federal law. Until we resolve whether the 2A forecloses that, law-abiding AR–15 owners must rely on the goodwill of a federal agency to retain their means of self-defense.
A gun in your safe is a vote for freedom. A gun on your hip is a deterrent against tyranny. And another gun in your collection is a firewall against the next ATF overreach.
Marx likely would have supported the peoples’ right to bear arms—right up until the point it no longer served his revolutionary purpose, at which point his support for gun rights would be jettisoned. And this is precisely what his followers did.
Anti-gunners’ frustration made it clear: this bill wasn’t just a symbolic stand — it directly undercuts the federal gun control regime many Democrats hope to expand in Texas.
“This is not the same ATF of the last four years. We are fundamentally changing course with a renewed focus on rebuilding trust with federal firearms licensees (FFLs), gun owners, and the public by prioritizing public safety and collaboration.”
The Second Amendment unequivocally protects the right to keep and bear arms, and the NFA’s restrictive provisions—originally enacted to combat gang violence nearly a century ago—have long outlived their utility.
Veterans Affairs Committee Chairman Bost laid out why military veterans shouldn’t be forced to make the difficult decision between seeking needed health benefits and keeping their Second Amendment rights.