DOJ and the Courts Say the NFA is a Tax…The Senate Parliamentarian Has No Choice But to Rule That Way, Too
At this point everyone following the National Firearms Act debate is well aware of then-Attorney General Cummings’ famous testimony in […]
At this point everyone following the National Firearms Act debate is well aware of then-Attorney General Cummings’ famous testimony in […]
The upshot is that the Court is really busy with other stuff right now, and you all should just come back later. This case has been pending for nearly four years. Maryland gun owners will just have to chill.
In 2024, Kamala Harris sensed what the Overton window would tolerate, so she pretended to be pro-handgun. Specifically, she bragged
The answer is probably yes.
I think we’re getting to the point now where even the more cynical gun rights supporters need to admit that President Trump is doing pretty well on Second Amendment issues.
We need a Supreme Court that is willing to actively police the hostile circuits and summarily reverse them frequently. We also need Judge VanDyke to become Justice VanDyke.
Of course, it isn’t really about the GLOCK switches at all. Antigunners salivate at the chance to ban one of the most popular handguns in the country.
Lots of things had gone into the pressure cooker that eventually exploded into the American Revolution, but the ultimate intolerable act, the spark that made the patriots decide it was time to start shooting was the British attempt to disarm them.
The problem is far more nuanced than Mascia is willing to acknowledge. Her article makes only a passing mention of the racial disparities in the data. She doesn’t provide those numbers, so I will.
I imagine if Trump (or any other President for that matter) ignores SCOTUS after a Snope denial, the response from much of the pro-2A side will be, “Good. They wouldn’t defend our rights, why should we give a shit about them being ignored?”