Change: Acting AG Todd Blanche Lays Out Second Amendment Realignment at DOJ
Blanche’s framing of the administration’s new policy announcement as something that will “change everything” sets an unusually high bar for public expectations.
Blanche’s framing of the administration’s new policy announcement as something that will “change everything” sets an unusually high bar for public expectations.
‘Who, me? Oh no, I don’t own guns, I’m not that kind of person.’ But unsaid is that the not-a-gun-person expects someone else with a gun to come and protect them at just the right moment.
Firearms are going to be part of the civilian defense starter kit for decades to come. But drones are starting to feel like a missing layer of that starter kit.
Criminalizing information doesn’t work. Someone intent on illegally printing a firearm is already subject to charges for that act.
The right to carry, the right to bear arms, the right to have them in your home and enjoy them for lawful purposes is meaningless if you’re not able to acquire those firearms.
Legal positions aside, the Trump administration does not even consistently pay lip service to Second Amendment rights.
“Giffords PAC has been playing fast and loose with how they are soliciting funds to support themselves and their preferred gun control candidates for elected office.”
The Administration informed us yesterday that “At this time, the [Trump Administration] has decided to maintain the current definition of firearm ‘frame’ and ‘receiver’ contained in that final [Biden Administration] rule.”
Armed robbery, the justices ruled on March 10, doesn’t count as a violent enough crime to lock someone up before trial.
The purpose isn’t to re-write the Book of Five Rings, but to take the lessons from nearly 400 years ago and apply them to today’s world where we don’t carry swords, but guns.