Why is it that, after being told their gun laws are unconstitutional, so many areas that are run by anti-gun extremists seem to respond with something along the lines of, “Oh yeah? Watch what we do next!” We saw this type of response after the landmark NYSRPA v. Bruen decision that affirmed law-abiding gun owners have a right to carry firearms for self-defense away from the home.
Like spoiled children who run to their room when told they can’t do something by their parents, anti-gun extremists ran to anti-gun legislatures to ram through more anti-gun laws that seek to circumvent the Bruen decision. We saw several states, including Hawaii, New Jersey, and New York, quickly pass and enact new laws to restrict the lawful carry of firearms.
The laws in both New Jersey and New York—based on expanding so-called “sensitive places” where carry is prohibited to the point where virtually nowhere is deemed suitable for lawful carry—have suffered losses in court, while Hawaii’s may soon be dealt a crushing blow to its anti-self-defense regime by the U.S. Supreme Court.
In apparent preparation for a loss, anti-gun extremists ran to the Hawaii legislature shortly after the Supreme Court heard the challenge to its unconstitutional law, filing yet another feeble attempt to potentially circumvent a ruling by the Court.
Meanwhile, Bearing Arms recently reported the U.S. Virgin Islands, has adopted “a massive gun control bill,” even as the U.S. territory is already facing a lawsuit challenging existing policy relating to the issuance of their gun permits.
In December of last year, the Second Amendment Section of the Civil Rights Division of the DoJ announced its intent to sue the Virgin Islands Police Department for “an unconstitutional permitting process” in the V.I. As part of that announcement, Assistant Attorney General Harmeet Dhillon, who’s in charge of the Civil Rights Division and created its Second Amendment Section, was quoted in a release, stating . . .
The newly-established Second Amendment Section filed this lawsuit to bring the Virgin Islands Police Department back into legal compliance by ensuring that applicants receive timely decisions without unconstitutional obstruction.
So, similar to other anti-gun jurisdictions, the most virulently anti-gun operators in the V.I. responded to being told they were doing something wrong…by doubling down on the wrongness.
Bearing Arms describes the VI effort as an attempt to moot the lawsuit challenging the permit issuing process, a procedure Hawaii should have probably considered in light of the hard questions its counsel faced during the Supreme Court hearing on its initial attempt to circumvent Bruen.
But along with the apparent attempt to moot the suit regarding carry permit issuing in the island territory, Bearing Arms reports there’s also language seeking to impose bans on popular semi-automatic firearms and magazines capable of holding more than 15 rounds, as well as adding restrictions on where permit holders may lawfully carry firearms for self-defense—the so-called “sensitive place” restrictions on carry that jurisdictions like New Jersey and New York implemented that led to their laws being challenged in court.
Similarly, semi-auto and magazine bans are also being challenged by Harmeet Dhillon’s team of attorneys, most notably in Denver, Colo., and Washington, D.C.
So, as with others, the V.I. appears to be thumbing its nose at the Second Amendment and the Trump administration by doubling down on anti-gun efforts when told they are already doing something unconstitutional. Disappointing, but hardly surprising.
We will be sure to continue to post updates on these cases, as well as what we presume will be other cases coming out of other anti-gun government agencies at the state, local, or territorial level.
Ass’t AG Dhillon needs to take an additional tack in the Civil Rights Divisions’s activities.
These illegal actions — which are designed to intentionally deprive citizens of their rights under the Second Amendment — are being taken by individuals acting under color of law. Here the statute
TITLE 18, U.S.C., SECTION 242
Whoever, under color of any law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom, willfully subjects any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States, … shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both; and if bodily injury results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include the use, attempted use, or threatened use of a dangerous weapon, explosives, or fire, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and if death results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, shall be fined under this title, or imprisoned for any term of years or for life, or both, or may be sentenced to death.
This is the law the feds use to go after cops who commit crimes against civilians while acting in their official capacity. Dhillon can and should similarly go after state officials (such as the NY Gov and Philadelphia city officials) who openly admit that what they are doing is contrary to the law as articulated in Bruen.
Put a couple such individuals in jail (or at least have to spend a fortune defending themselves), and watch how quickly the virtue signaling stops.
The government can bring actions against such persons, in their individual capacities, and seek to
Justice Thomas Says the Commerce Clause Is the REAL Problem.
“The Supreme Court’s Hemani decision made headlines for striking down the government’s attempt to automatically disarm marijuana users. But Justice Clarence Thomas’ concurrence may be even more important.
In this video, we break down Thomas’ warning that federal gun possession laws may exceed Congress’s authority under the Commerce Clause. If he’s right, the foundation of many federal firearms laws could face serious constitutional challenges in the years ahead.
…”
ht* tps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=djFKPUzl2Wk
The “Why Do You Need That?” Gun Question Finally Answered.
(Colion) ” ‘Why do you need that?’
Why do you need an AR-15?
Why do you need a 30-round magazine?
…
The answer is simple:
Ask why the police need them.
Because police carry those tools to confront violent, dangerous people.
But who usually meets that violent person first?
You do.
The officer only shows up after a citizen is already being attacked. That means you are the first person standing in front of the threat — alone, without a badge, without backup, and without a radio.
If a trained officer with a vest, a team, and a department behind him needs an AR-15 and standard magazines to handle that threat, then the citizen who meets that same threat first needs them at least as much.
And Washington’s own law proves it.
Their assault weapons ban outlaws these rifles for regular people, then carves out exceptions for law enforcement and the military.
So the state admits these tools are useful for facing danger.
They just decided you don’t deserve them.
And before anyone says, ‘That’s fine, the police will protect you,’ the Supreme Court has already made clear that police do not have a constitutional duty to protect you as an individual.
So why do you need it?
Because you are the only person guaranteed to be there when something happens to you.
…”
ht* tps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=adU2tz6xmmg
The Justice Who Wants to Undo Federal Gun Laws.
“Today, we attempt to answer one of the most common questions posed here at WGL, which is how does the Federal government derive the powers to regulate firearms in the manner it does? Washington Gun Law President, William Kirk, discusses that exact question with the help of Justice Thomas’ concurring opinion in United States v. Hemani. While Congress and the Courts have routinely held that the Commerce Clause gives Congress literally unlimited power to regulate all things, Justice Thomas takes a closer look to discover that perhaps, many Federal gun laws, are actually resting on shaky constitutional grounds. Could this be the beginning of the end for many Federal gun statutes? Learn all of that today and arm yourself with education.”
ht* tps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=62FfMsbs7uI
Twenty-One Years Later, Justice Thomas Is Still Right About the Commerce Clause.
ht* tps://pjmedia.com/timothy-harper/2026/06/23/twenty-one-years-later-justice-thomas-is-still-right-about-the-commerce-clause-n4954279
Left wing loons of the View, and Sunny Hostin is a left wing loon callous witch: The View push ‘insane’ narrative on Karmelo Anthony murder case.
ht* tps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=82qZ0EDt3o0
[note: The View and their Sunny Hostin, are typical left wingers. They live in an altered imaginary reality where they push propaganda where reality facts are changed slightly or omitted to fit their narrative and context is ignored and they are guided by confirmation bias. We see this in the left wing media and with most other left wingers and most democrat politcians, and for example here with Miner49er. Contrary to the narrative The View is pushing, which is also basically the same narrative other left wingers are pushing – Karmelo Anthony intentionally went to that tent armed with the knife with the intent of provoking a confrontation, he intended to use the knife in that confrontation he did instigate and the evidence and witnesses, including the defense own witnesses, substantiated this and the defense even had to change their ‘self defense’ defense as a result and try to go for a manslaughter defense to lessen the impact when they realized murder was for a fact being proven. It was clear this was not self defense or manslaughter but rather murder.]
The left winger GVA “200 mass shootings” lie: They Are Cooking the “Mass Shooting” Books (Here’s the Proof)
“How do major organizations arrive at the data they present to the public? In this video, we dive deep into the specific criteria and methods used by database tracking groups to classify major events, and how a slight shift in definition can completely alter the public’s perception of reality.
Using a recent, widely discussed public event in Chico, California as a case study, we examine how strict numerical thresholds can inadvertently exclude textbook scenarios while lumping in entirely different categories of community disputes.
If you want to understand the true patterns behind public events, it all comes down to analyzing the underlying motive. We break down three distinct categories that explain why these events occur, separating them into clear, logic-based classifications:
The isolated public actor.
Contained domestic escalations.
Confrontational community disputes and street-level activity.
When you look at the raw data through this precise analytical lens, the numbers look completely different than what is typically highlighted in the mainstream media. Watch until the end to see the real breakdown and learn how to see past narrative control. ”
ht* tps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iPIy8xmixgU
Left wing violence and terrorism and lies [and attempted mass shooting], and yes trans involved (some of the participating antifa members are trans): WaPo Downplays Attempted Assassination By Antifa As ‘ICE Protest’
ht* tps://thefederalist.com/2026/06/24/wapo-downplays-attempted-assassination-by-antifa-as-ice-protest/
Armed Self-Defense Incidents Show Why Second Amendment is Worth Safeguarding.
ht* tps://pjmedia.com/amy-swearer-jenna-rahn/2026/06/23/armed-self-defense-incidents-show-why-second-amendment-is-worth-safeguarding-n4954283
But but but… the left wing and their democrat politicians tells us this never happens and the claims that it does is a crazy right wing conspiracy theory they tell us: Convicted – Three More Noncitizens Who Voted in U.S. Elections
ht* tps://pjmedia.com/catherinesalgado/2026/06/23/convicted-three-more-noncitizens-who-voted-in-us-elections-n4954296
Trump reveals admin is working on creating ‘national right to carry’ firearms.
“President Donald Trump has said that he is working with lawmakers on legislation that would produce a nationally recognized right to carry firearms, saying that the White House is working to put a bill through Congress.
…”
ht* tps://thepostmillennial.com/trump-reveals-admin-is-working-on-creating-national-right-to-carry-firearms?utm_campaign=64470
Left wing violence and hate crimes: Muslim man arrested on hate crime charges for attacking Christian woman in Portland.
ht* tps://thepostmillennial.com/muslim-man-arrested-on-hate-crime-charges-for-allegedly-attacking-christian-woman-in-portland?utm_campaign=64470
Well, this is different – a democrat politician does the right thing in astronomically rare moment of clarity-break from left wing mental illness: Major Victory in Arizona – Governor Signs Range Protection Legislation.
“Arizona Democrat Governor Katie Hobbs has quietly signed a major piece of legislation protecting the world-class Ben Avery Shooting Facility, and other publicly owned gun ranges, from development when not a single member of her own party would support the measure.
House Bill 2763, sponsored by Republican State Representative Quang Nguyen, was among several dozen bills inked by Hobbs, with no fanfare.
…”
ht* tps://www.ammoland.com/2026/06/major-victory-in-arizona-governor-signs-range-protection-legislation/
🤣 End Wokeness Asked for the Most Insane Video Flashbacks From the COVID Era and X Users Delivered.
ht* tps://twitchy.com/dougp/2026/06/24/end-wokeness-asks-for-the-dumbest-video-flashbacks-from-2020-and-x-users-deliver-n2429554
Washington state is the red-headed stepchild that everyone ignores.
They also enacted unconstitutional anti-gun laws after Bruen.
The Supreme Court is impotent.
The reason they doubled down is that they don’t think the Court is serious about Bruen. And Rahimi demonstrated that they’re probably right.
Also, the Court is reluctant enough to take 2nd amendment cases that, even if they do something blatantly unconstitutional, they’ll be permitted to keep doing it for years before they’ll be stopped. And then they won’t be punished for it.
The only way to stop them would be something like putting them under gun-law preclearance, like was done with the South for civil rights. And not enough members of Congress would care to do that.