When those who have worn a badge look at everything the ATF has done, from its incredibly sloppy search warrants to its obscene uses of lethal force, they realize it’s time to get rid of the entire agency.
Giffords’ pivot to actual theater matches their overall approach of using theatrics to push gun control laws that do little to hold criminals accountable for their crimes and instead only penalize law-abiding Americans who exercise their 2A rights.
When Democrats have been rebuffed at their attempts to undermine our rights by the legislature, they have sought to use courts and administrative procedures to instead cripple the firearms industry, and this is yet another example of that.
Some of the justices’ questions demonstrated that they did not all seem to fully understand how the industry legally conducts business. Here are a couple of examples.
In the latest battle over gun rights in Washington, lawmakers in both the House and Senate have introduced opposing bills that would either lower or raise the age to legally purchase firearms.
The justices questioned if this case wasn’t a wholesale attempt to redefine Second Amendment rights altogether, and how Americans might be able to exercise their rights to keep and bear arms.
Unlike the bureaucrats and anti-gun zealots who have traditionally run the agency, Dan O’Kelly actually understands firearms, their mechanics, and their place in American history.
Those who hunt deer, elk, bear, moose, big horn sheep, and wild turkey and other wildlife, create what you might say is a healthy flywheel to an already powerful engine block.
The plan published by the Bloomberg School’s “Consortium for Risk-Based Firearm Policy,” promotes the idea that gun ownership would be better treated as a privilege and not as a right guaranteed for all law-abiding citizens.
The Trace and Sentient’s game plan isn’t new, but it’s still maddening. American hunters helping their communities should be praised and assisted in ways that help them do even more.
