We aren’t getting tired of heaping praise upon Harmeet Dhillon, Assistant Attorney General for the Civil Rights Division of the Department of Justice as she continues to push the envelope when it comes to the Trump administration defending the Second Amendment. Last week, we wrote about a letter she sent to California Governor Gavin Newsom and Attorney General Robert Bonta that notified the pair that she has “authorized the filing of a complaint in federal district court against” California.
While Dhillon offered the duo the opportunity to avoid going to court by entering into negotiations to address constitutional issues with California’s GLOCK ban and the California handgun roster statutes, Bonta responded to the offer with a complete rejection.
Assistant AG Dhillon’s retort, in a post to X, said, “See y’all in court!” Shortly after, the DOJ announced it had filed the promised lawsuit.
Dhillon has a habit of responding to posts on X that proclaim unconstitutional and illegal activities by promising future litigation. When it was announced anti-gun Governor Abigail Spanberger had signed Virginia’s ban on semi-automatic firearms and standard-capacity magazines, Dhillon went with the more common phrasing, “See you in court!”
True to her word, the same day DOJ announced its California suit it announced the filing of a lawsuit against the Virginia bans. That day, July 1, was the day the Virginia law was to go into effect.
This lawsuit challenging the ban on constitutional grounds at the federal level merely adds to the growing list of setbacks for anti-gun extremists in the Old Dominion; a list that includes pro-Second Amendment government officials stating they would not enforce the unconstitutional ban and an injunction against enforcing the law thanks to a suit filed by NRA and others challenging the ban at the state level.
NRA has also filed a lawsuit against the ban in federal court.
We don’t anticipate anti-gun zealots letting up one iota in their unconstitutional campaign to eradicate the Second Amendment and disarm law-abiding Americans. That makes Harmeet Dhillon’s help all the more welcome.
[Another delusional left wing anti-gun] …. Politician Wants America Gun-Free Like Japan.
(Colion) “A congressional candidate says she wants America to look more like Japan.
No guns for citizens.
No guns for police.
Nobody armed.
She called it “lovely.”
But here’s what gets left out of the brochure:
Japan took the guns, and the killing didn’t stop.
Mass killings still happen.
Knife attacks still happen.
People still get stabbed on trains, at schools, in public places, and even inside shopping complexes.
The tool changed.
The evil didn’t.
That is the part anti-gun politicians never want to admit.
They sell you a fantasy where removing guns removes violence, but human evil does not disappear just because you take away one tool.
And this candidate doesn’t just want regular citizens disarmed.
She wants the police disarmed too.
So picture someone breaking into your house with a knife at 2 a.m.
You call 911.
And in her dream version of America, the officer who shows up is unarmed too.
What exactly is he supposed to do?
Ask politely?
Fight him with a clipboard?
This is what happens when people build public policy from fantasy instead of reality.
The Second Amendment exists because you are the first responder when danger finds you.
The government has no constitutional duty to protect you as an individual, and even when police do respond, they usually arrive after the violence has already started.
A gun is not a magic wand.
But it gives the smaller, weaker, outnumbered, or targeted person a fighting chance.
Taking that away does not make society safer.
It makes victims easier.
Japan is not proof that gun control ends violence.
Japan is proof that evil adapts.”
ht* tps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GLAz7HmHofg
Armed Civilian [good-guy-with-a-gun] Gets Into Gun Fight To Save Woman From Kidnapper. [spoiler: The good guy wins, making sure the intended victim wins. But watch the video, take note of the information pointing out the anti-gun fallacy for magazine limits or bans.]
(Colion) “A masked gunman threw a woman to the ground in broad daylight, put a gun to her head, and tried to take her.
Then an armed civilian stepped in.
What followed was a real gun fight — across a street, behind cover, with rounds coming back at him and an accomplice nearby in a getaway SUV.
This is the kind of defensive gun use anti-gunners pretend never happens.
A regular man noticed something was wrong before the attack even started. A guy in a ski mask and gloves at 10 in the morning didn’t look right, and that situational awareness gave him the head start he needed when everything went bad.
He didn’t draw fast. He drew slow. Deliberate. Behind cover.
Because real life doesn’t always look like the square range. Sometimes the situation calls for speed. Sometimes it calls for patience. Sometimes it calls for making the right move at the right second.
He gave the attacker a chance to drop the gun. The attacker fired first. That’s when the gun fight started.
The criminal fired at least five rounds. The armed civilian fired five rounds. He hit the attacker, stopped the threat, and saved a woman from what he says was an organized kidnapping and trafficking crew.
And this is why magazine capacity matters. This is why training matters. This is why awareness matters.
You don’t get to pick how many attackers show up. You don’t get to pick the distance. You don’t get to pick whether they brought friends. And you definitely don’t get to call timeout when the state-approved number of rounds runs out.
But the fight didn’t end when the shooting stopped.
The man who stopped the crime still ended up in handcuffs, in a holding cell, asking himself if he was going to jail.
That’s the second fight nobody talks about.
The legal fight. The investigation. The attorney. The cost. The system.
This is exactly why every armed citizen needs to prepare for both fights — the one in the street, and the one that starts after the cops arrive.”
ht* tps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8L0hq7L1TPc