Everytown, Giffords and rest say the new group will circumvent the “congressional stalemate” on gun-control legislation at the national level and will focus on changing state laws, where they have seen recent successes.
Surprise – the vice president was stumped. She had no response to the logical reasoning that the firearm industry continues to highlight when calls for gun control are made – that criminals do not follow the law.
It’s clear that Kamala Harris still supports gun confiscation and is a threat to the rights of all law-abiding gun owners.
The core claim: A firearm in the home significantly increases the risk of suicide, homicide, death during domestic disputes, and
DeSantis announced on social media Monday that “The State of Florida will be conducting its own investigation regarding the attempted assassination at Trump International Golf Club.”
It seems that murdering 12 people and then committing suicide isn’t interesting enough for the anti-gun droogs at Moms Demand Action to build a nice, juicy narrative-reinforcing post around.
[Ryan Wesley] Routh faced criminal charges in North Carolina for two separate incidents, in April and December 2002. According to the
Today, gun control activists falsely assert the 1994 “assault weapons” ban totally worked and so we should enact another one. But they knew that wasn’t true in 2004 and they know it now.
Scholars call ammo the “actual agent of harm” in gun violence. Criminals don’t have to be good shots, or worry about how much ammo they burn through. Without the ammo, the gun is just an empty vessel.
As for the constitutionality of banning “assault weapons,” good luck with that, Ms. Harris. There’s literally no text, history, or tradition in this country of banning civilian possession of firearms that have been actual weapons of war.
