Things Get Messy Fast When You Dig Into the Numbers Behind the Gun Control Industry’s Favorite Talking Points
For decades, gun control advocates and their allies in “public health” have pushed a misleading factoid about children and firearms. […]
For decades, gun control advocates and their allies in “public health” have pushed a misleading factoid about children and firearms. […]
The Chicago registry was highly touted by its proponents and media cheerleaders as a major leap forward in fighting “gun violence.” Its failure is a lesson that should be remembered when the “next big thing” in “gun violence prevention” has its day in the public eye.
It is almost exactly three years ago that the United States Supreme Court ruled in the landmark case of NYSRPA v.
Residents of the Empire State can now rest easier knowing that their top law enforcement officer is on the job ridding the state of the scourge of toy guns that look fun enough for kids to actually want to play with them.
“If we doubled it, if we just went to $400, you could sell only half as many and not lose a penny in revenue. If we tripled it, you might actually discourage some sales of silencers. Wouldn’t that be a good thing for us to be doing in this committee?”
ATF has credited President Trump’s Feb. 7, 2025, executive order Protecting Second Amendment Rights as the basis for terminating zero tolerance, implementing a fairer enforcement policy, and reexamining the prior adverse licensing actions.
None of this is terribly complicated. By continuing to throw their support behind gangsters, murderers and other criminals, observes one commentator, the Democrats are simply “digging a deeper and deeper political grave for themselves.
The procedural contortions in these various ongoing magazine ban cases grow more grating with each case. Recall that the U.S. Supreme Court rejected taking up the magazine ban issue in a Seventh Circuit ruling arising from an Illinois law.
The New Jersey Gun Violence Research Center suggests “integrating oral care into gun violence prevention organizations could be essential in mitigating the risks of both gun violence and lack of dental care.”
To say a committed and involved DOJ could be a force multiplier in the project to uphold the 2A would be an understatement. It could be a gamechanger and could give recalcitrant anti-gun states – used to acting with virtual impunity – a reason to curb their prohibitionist ambitions.