If a journalist wants to show that the work the commission produced is deficient, maybe she should use voices more potent than an aging thespian and a physician with an axe to grind to support her narrative.
One ATF official told me they were reviewing Adamiak’s case to get a U.S. Attorney to release him from prison. That ATF official is no longer returning calls. I think he was just playing for time and trying to stop us from telling Adamiak’s story.
The NSSF study was obtained by Michael Bloomberg’s ‘The Trace’ which is apparently doing a series of articles contending that so-called “gun reforms” might be embraced by American gun owners.
Adamiak saw the ATF’s misdeeds firsthand when they offered him a plea deal. If he admitted that he knowingly and willfully possessed 25 machineguns, prosecutors would only recommend a seven-year prison sentence.
The bottom line is this: ATF’s 2,600 Special Agents deserve to be judged exactly as they judge America’s gun owners: They’re all guilty and they all need to go.
Unfortunately for Adamiak, the ATF knows that the items that became evidence at his trial were not illegal, but since the prosecutors used them successfully, they will likely also be used as evidence during his appeal.
What is noteworthy about this development is that it marks the first time a panel of this Court has invalidated a gun control measure under the Second Amendment without the full Court subsequently reversing or modifying the decision en banc.
The state of Washington’s lawsuit accuses Wentz and Gator’s of violating the state’s Consumer Protection Act when it sold standard capacity magazines to two state “investigators” on two occasions.
Newsom and his flunkies were probably too intimidated by their own gun laws to figure it out. For the low, low, price of a $10,000 donation to the Second Amendment Foundation, I’d be glad to help Newsom’s team figure this out.
Doctors are increasing their anti-gun fight against President Donald J. Trump’s pro-gun policies and ideas by publishing more fictional stories based on anti-gun sources than ever before, and JAMA can’t publish the biased untruths fast enough.
