Now Comes the Gun-Grab: Rhode Island Dems Go for Full-On Confiscation
The most misleading aspect of this debate in Rhode Island is how it is described to the public. Calling these proposals “just a ban on future sales” is inaccurate.
The most misleading aspect of this debate in Rhode Island is how it is described to the public. Calling these proposals “just a ban on future sales” is inaccurate.
“Giffords PAC has been playing fast and loose with how they are soliciting funds to support themselves and their preferred gun control candidates for elected office.”
Bad facts drive bad policy. The issue here is not whether crime near schools is serious. The issue is whether the public is being told the truth.
Gov. Spanberger might have lied about how she intends to govern, but the numbers don’t.
Maybe the prospect of the Bloomberg School, that’s named for America’s most prominent gun-grabber, handing out locks provided by the gun industry is more than anyone at Johns Hopkins can handle.
The entire premise of Canada’s confiscation scheme would be laughable if it didn’t demonstrate how utterly unserious its elected officials are about public safety.
Senator Warren and Rep. Meeks invoked their oversight authority to demand a sweeping accounting of semi-automatic firearm export licenses approved since January 2025.
If Chapman had been put behind bars years ago for illegally supplying three different firearms to would-be criminals, it’s highly likely innocent Americans — such as Lt. Col. Shah — would still be alive today.
These states are doing it right. They show what can be accomplished when outdoor, hunting and shooting community members all partner to manage wildlife populations.
In gun control strongholds across the country, antigun politicians continue to prove they believe armed security is a necessity for those in power and a problem for everyone else.