“The tax cut is meaningless. No one cares about the tax. Killing registration was what would have mattered.” That’s insane to me. A reduction of $200 per suppressor or SBR is not chump change, especially for those who make their own.
We may see our side take a page from the Obama/Biden tactic of “sue and settle.” That involved the government collusively working with various environmental groups to file a lawsuit and then “take a knee” and allow a binding judgment to be entered.
While you’re scrolling through web sites deciding what can you’re gonna buy now and digging out that old stripped lower so you can Form 1 it and build that SBR, the NRA, SAF, FPC, and ASA are getting ready to file a lawsuit that will challenge the NFA in its entirety.
That “year after year” bit is key, because the market will evolve. This isn’t just a price change in a static market. There are new segments to open up.
Leave it to the Dorr Brothers to label the biggest neutering of the National Firearms Act scheme in history a
Early Saturday, it looked as if the Senate’s reconciliation bill would not include the Stop Harassing Owners of Rifles Today Act
Eliminating the $200 tax on suppressors & short-barrels has ABSOLUTELY NOTHING TO DO with turning semiautomatic firearms into machineguns. We need mental acuity tests in the Senate for folks like Senator Jack Reed.
Giffords has a problem with the latest provision the Senate has inserted in the Big Beautiful Bill, even after it’s
Last night, the Senate chose what’s behind door number one. They’ve added language to the One Big Beautiful Bill that would eliminate the NFA’s $200 tax on suppressors, SBRs, SBSs and machineguns.
The fact that the National Firearms Act has been defended as a tax on gun ownership by the federal government
