Not Counting Chickens, But Gun-Grabbers Are Probably Right to be Panicked About SCOTUS Taking up ‘Assault Weapons’ Bans
Finally, the clouds have parted. Gloom gave way to sunshine. The day at the Supreme Court is arriving.
Finally, the clouds have parted. Gloom gave way to sunshine. The day at the Supreme Court is arriving.
The decided cases also have potentially broad implications. If drug use, by itself, does not justify disarming someone, what about a nonviolent felony conviction?
When the test for stripping a right is “good cause” – words that mean whatever the person holding the stamp wants them to mean – the test itself violates the Constitution.
Gun-ban radicals weren’t merely lobbying from the outside. They had allies and former colleagues inside the federal government.
Gun controllers currently have a 1-6 win-loss record before the U.S. Supreme Court since Heller revived the Second Amendment in 2008.
Dhillon has a habit of responding to posts on X that proclaim unconstitutional and illegal activities by promising future litigation.
The latest shot(s) across the bow of blue states’ ever-expanding web of gun control laws designed to make exercising Second
“The modern semi-automatic rifles banned in Cook County, Connecticut and elsewhere are among the most commonly owned firearms in the country.”
Gun owners can’t sit back and hope for the courts to intervene on their behalf. Other states will seek to follow now that three others have joined California.
Prosecutors, sheriffs, and police must prioritize the use of their personnel and resources and can drop enforcement of laws they consider unconstitutional or immoral to the bottom of the list.