Like Just About Every Other Issue, Texas’s Talarico Misfires Badly on Gun Control
Talarico suggested strict gun control was acceptable because Texans need to “get a permit to exercise the First Amendment right to assemble.”
Talarico suggested strict gun control was acceptable because Texans need to “get a permit to exercise the First Amendment right to assemble.”
Plaintiffs are arguing they have the right to buy the banned arms to preserve their ability to function as the militia that is preserved under the Virginia constitution’s Militia Clause.
Billed by gun control activists as a “public safety measure,” it is, rather, confiscation legislation aimed at law-abiding Americans.
These measures are red meat for liberal voting bases and — more importantly — secure donations from anti-gun donors and Super PACs.
3d printer spyware is a popular idea among one control freak billionaire who has enough money to make it seem like it’s a popular idea when it is not.
The silence of the gun control industry is deafening when individuals they call as community leaders are charged with serious violent offenses.
Acting AG Todd Blanche has said the proposed changes took longer than expected to complete because lawyers had to scrupulously review them to ensure they passed legal muster.
The exodus of firearm companies from states hostile to Second Amendment rights and firearm and ammunition manufacturers isn’t limited to Virginia.
The UN wants to hold not only the firearms industry, but the entire commercial supply chain, responsible for the criminal diversion of their products.
The Brady gun control group is hopping mad that their “name-and-shame” charade no longer enjoys government support. They’re so mad,