Trump Vows to Shut Down Operation Choke Point…Again

credit card terminal machine
Bigstock

The plague of businesses and individuals being exiled from the modern economy by politically motivated regulators is back in the news, thanks largely to a recent segment on the Joe Rogan Experience podcast in which a guest highlighted the ongoing scandal. Marc Andreessen, a pioneer in the web browsing industry and a current venture capitalist, shocked the hugely popular and influential podcaster by detailing how political opponents of the Biden administration were being systematically deprived of financial services.

The revelations took on new significance amidst Biden’s wholesale weaponization of government for partisan ends, which has included censorship, intimidation, character assassination, and selective prosecutions, among other things. For Second Amendment advocates, it was a reminder of Biden’s long association with official corruption aimed at businesses involved with firearms and ammunition.

One of the more notorious episodes from the Obama-Biden administration was Operation Choke Point, a scheme to use pressure from federal regulators to coerce banks and payment processors from doing business with legal but politically disfavored industries. The idea was to choke off the supply of financial services the businesses needed to survive in the modern economy, while bypassing the legal scrutiny of the legislative process and official enforcement proceedings.

The firearm industry was a prime target of Operation Choke Point, and many lawfully operated, otherwise financially stable businesses in that sector fell victim to its abusive, discriminatory practices.

The Obama-Biden administration first denied and then tried to whitewash the ongoing conspiracy as merely a misunderstood form of “risk management” guidance. Of course, plausible deniability was the whole point.

It wasn’t the government itself directly acting on the operation’s targets, but government regulated financial service providers responding to subtle but clearly understood threats about the potential consequences of doing business with the “wrong” clients. These included costly and embarrassing oversight actions designed to portray the banks as lax on safeguarding their depositors against nefarious activity.

The tactic was apparently so successful in suppressing the targeted commerce that its proponents became increasingly emboldened and overt. Eventually, banking executives were hauled before congressional committees to explain themselves for servicing perfectly legal and creditworthy businesses engaged in politically disfavored activity. These included bank customers that were involved in the business of making and selling semiautomatic firearms that anti-gunners in Congress had unsuccessfully sought to ban as “assault weapons.”

Things became so far gone that the tactics were eventually directed at the NRA by New York State financial regulators who were so blatant and ham-fisted that NRA had enough evidence to challenge their actions in court. The suit charged the New York officials with violating the NRA’s first Amendment right to advocate for the constitutional liberties of its members.

The defendants unsuccessfully sought to have the suit dismissed by the trial court and then appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, which reversed the trial court and dismissed the case.  The NRA then appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court, where none other than the ACLU joined the suit on the NRA’s side.

The high court would go on to unanimously rule in the NRA’s favor, in an opinion written by Sonia Sotomayor, considered perhaps the staunchest leftist among the nine justices (and certainly no fan of the Second Amendment). Sotomayor characterized the First Amendment principles in the case as well-established. “Today, the Court reaffirms [that] Government officials cannot attempt to coerce private parties in order to punish or suppress views that the government disfavors,” the opinion stated.

Despite that rare and stark bipartisan rebuke against the tactics at the heart of Operation Choke Point and its sinister offspring, Andreessen claimed the Biden administration has continued and expanded these schemes. He gave several recent examples to Rogan of businesses and people who had been “de-banked,” so Andreessen asserted, “for having the wrong politics, for saying unacceptable things.”

Andreessen also explained that regulators used the concept of a “politically exposed person” to force banks to discontinue business not just with commercial entities but even with individuals who were at odds with the administration’s own politics. As he said to Rogan, the government gets around its own constitutional constraints on punishing private persons and companies for their views by using private banks as the cutouts and hatchet men.

In this way, Andreessen said, “the government gets to say, ‘we didn’t do it; it was the private company that did it.” Banks that cooperate, Andreessen continued, additionally receive government protection from potential competitors offering innovated new financial products. He tied the recent developments back to the original Operation Choke Point, which he said targeted “guns,” among other industries disfavored by Obama and Biden. Andreessen described the regime as of one of “no due process … no rules … no court … no appeal … .”

During his first term, President Trump officially ended the original Operation Choke Point. But the scheme’s lessons had been learned, both by corrupt government officials and by private financial service providers who either shared their politics or who were afraid of the consequences to their own livelihoods and enterprises if they crossed them. Once Trump was out of office, Joe Biden again had the infrastructure at his disposal to resurrect and intensify Choke Point’s tactics. According to Mark Andreessen, that is exactly what the Biden-Harris administration did.

Donald Trump
Bigstock

Fortunately, President Trump is again poised to ascend to the White House. And he has made the elimination of government waste, fraud, and abuse a top priority of his administration, including through the newly established Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). The two principals of DOGE – Elon Musk and Vivek Ramaswamy – are themselves well-known to Joe Rogan, who seemed suitably aghast at Andreessen’s account of what the venture capitalist called Operation Choke Point 2.0. Trump himself is also aware of and opposed to the phenomenon, telling an audience at a the Bitcoin2024 conference that “as president, I will immediately shutdown Choke Point 2.0.”

Hopefully the renewed focus on this devious scheme will bring about lasting reforms and even, perhaps, accountability for those involved.

 

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

20 thoughts on “Trump Vows to Shut Down Operation Choke Point…Again”

  1. Geoff "I'm getting too old for this shit" PR

    “One of the more notorious episodes from the Obama-Biden administration was Operation Choke Point, a scheme to use pressure from federal regulators to coerce banks and payment processors from doing business with legal but politically disfavored industries.”

    EVERYONE should watch that Joe Rogan video. I hope Trump can get some sort of anti-de-banking legislation accomplished, as his own family experienced it when his son Barron was denied opening a bank account, and no explanation as to why being given, when he asked *why*…

    1. Geoff "45 and 47" PR

      This is what happened to TTAG’s “Firearms Concierge” , one day his bank just dropped him *cold*… 🙁

    2. The incoming Treasury Secretary needs to order the head of the FDIC to immediately issue an order along these lines:
      ====
      Within ten days, every FDIC employee above GS (X) must submit a statement, under penalty of perjury, that either (1) he or she was not involved in or had any knowledge of any of the list of debanking activities listed below [detailed list of the kinds of debanking activities], or (2) he or she was so involved or had knowledge of others being involved, and that knowledge or involvement is detailed I the documents attached to the statement.

      Failure to submit such a statement will be treated as an act of insubordination, resulting in the immediate termination of the employee for cause. Submission of a false or materially incomplete statement will similarly result in termination for cause, and referral to the Department of Justice for criminal prosecution.
      =====
      Anyone familiar with game theory can see the interpersonal dynamics this sets up, especially for employees who were not involved but knew who was and what they were doing. If such persons don’t report their colleagues, they face termination if someone else does, and it then comes out that their statement was materially incomplete (because they didn’t disclose all they knew). That sets up a risk/benefit analysis that will cause those involved to know that their days are numbered, and probably self deport.

  2. So ya bought a gun or ammo and used your bank account debit card or ya supported Trump, or maybe bough some MAGA hats or a bible well, or maybe a lots of things…. New Report Exposes Extensive Government Spying on Bank Accounts.

    “A new report released by the House Judiciary Committee, in partnership with the Select Subcommittee on the Weaponization of the Federal Government, reveals extensive violations and abuse of the law by the federal government.

    According to congressional investigators, the FBI abused the Bank Secrecy Act in order to work with banks to target opponents of the Biden administration and Trump supporters.

    …”

    h ttps://townhall.com/tipsheet/katiepavlich/2024/12/09/new-report-exposes-extensive-government-spying-on-bank-accounts-n2648783

  3. …and he needs to get rid of that purchasing code (MCC 5723 – Guns and Ammunition Shops, effective July 1, 2024) created to track gun purchases.

    1. Geoff "I'm getting too old for this shit" PR

      Yep, it’s called discrimination, ‘sporting goods’ is the only classification needed.

      Let’s see what happens when Trump takes power. This time, he’s gonna be hitting the ground running. Just his overall demeanor is different this time. He knows exactly what he wants to do, and he knows he has a very limited time to get it done. In 2 years, he will lose the house, so let’s see what happens…

      1. “In 2 years, he will lose the house”

        What makes you think that to be able to predict two years in advance? You have a time machine?

        😂

        Was it you over at TTAG that predicted Kamala would win this election?

        1. Unchecked rigging for state+local elections allows for unchecked rigging for congressional + senate elections. Pair that with historic precedent re house flips throughout a presidency and the nonstop propaganda (like 16-20) and it’s not a terrible guess. With that said there are a lot of things one can do with judicial watch.

          1. aside from the hopeful commies over there i’d wager that strict nein made very plausible arguments as to why trump would not win. (4.5 of the five pillars, actual meaningful poles, etc.). and just because trump won doesn’t forsee things tracking this way for much longer. the youngest batch of voters seem to not be so deceived as those lost to mass brainwashing, which is very promising.

        2. duhbra is still trolling geoff for complainig about the bumpstock ban (trunk wasn’t perfect. none ever have been).

          1. Geoff "I'm getting too old for this shit" PR

            “duhbra is still trolling geoff for complainig about the bumpstock ban…”

            She wants me. I predict in the not-distant-future she and I will be bumping uglies, and it will be the best I’ve (and her!) ever had.

            How about it, dearest? Could you use a proper (and thorough) tongue-lashing you’ll never forget? 😉

        3. Geoff "I'm getting too old for this shit" PR

          “What makes you think that to be able to predict two years in advance? You have a time machine?”

          Actually, I do. It’s called history.

          It almost always happens to the party currently in power, so it’s best to plan for the worst, and hope for the best.

          Planning for the worst includes getting your shit done while your ‘bird in the hand’ still exists…

          1. Geoff "I'm getting too old for this shit" PR

            I await your chipper retort to my reality-based truth bomb… 😉

          2. it’s going to be a battle of getting things done vs. how these accomplishments are to be portrayed. plus whatever “events” are manufactured.

          3. Geoff "I'm getting too old for this shit" PR

            “it’s going to be a battle of getting things done vs. how these accomplishments are to be portrayed.”

            Yeah, true, we”l see how it plays out. I’m with you on the youth vote, it was a very pleasant surprise, the med-terms may show if that ‘change-of-heart’ has some long-term legs to it.

            So, how’s the electrical distribution biz going in ‘Chi-town’ these days?

Scroll to Top