No, AOC, a Time of Increasing Political Violence is Not a Good Time to Limit Individual Gun Rights
It is perverse to ask people targeted for death for their beliefs to give up their right to defend themselves.
It is perverse to ask people targeted for death for their beliefs to give up their right to defend themselves.
They want all of us in this country to join them, to agree that Charlie Kirk got what he deserved. He supports gun rights, after all. That alone meant they would shed no tears for him, his wife, or his kids.
The Tennessee Department of Education released its curriculum last week, giving districts flexibility in how the lessons are taught while keeping the focus strictly on safety.
A rifle recovered in the hunt for conservative influencer Charlie Kirk’s assassin contained ammo engraved with “transgender and anti-fascist ideology,” according to preliminary reports from law enforcement sources.
“Assassination culture is spreading on the left. Forty-eight percent of liberals say it would be at least somewhat justified to murder Elon Musk. Fifty-five percent said the same about Donald Trump.”
In video posts circulating on social media, Kirk can be seen getting struck while speaking and sitting beneath a tent in the Utah Valley University courtyard.
Aside from some convoluted exceptions for people going fishing or some such stupidity, the squish-filled legislature has never mustered the political will to move an open carry bill to the Governor’s desk.
Cops say these gun aficionados are sharing their own designs on these pages, not necessarily because they are dangerous trigger-pullers themselves, but because they are looking for glory from their peers.
The Florida GOP supermajority should just follow through and do what they’ve promised the voters they would do.
“Guns are plentiful and common sense attempts to limit their availability have been largely rejected in the name of a freedom not found in our constitution.”