House Passes Reconciliation Bill Removing Suppressors From the NFA

American Suppressor Association reconciliation suppressors NFA

After huge amounts of the usual political sturm und drang, the House of Representatives passed the Big Beautiful Bill early this morning. That, in and of itself, isn’t really news. This is the reconciliation bill that, among many other things, makes permanent the tax cuts that were passed during Trump 1.0. If the bill fails, taxes would rise significantly on virtually everyone. Passing the bill is the only prayer Republicans have of holding onto the House in 2026.

The news for readers here, however, is what else was included in the bill. The final version doesn’t just zero out the $200 tax stamp on suppressor purchases as earlier versions did. The final version removes silencers entirely from regulation under the National Firearms Act.

American Suppressor Association house rules committee

What’s fun is the fact that the gun control lobby had spend the last two weeks issuing hair-on-fire, sky-is-falling email blasts and press releases warning that the NFA — with its fingerprints, background checks, and registration mandate –was actually useless. It was the $200 tax, they claimed, that was keeping us all safe from silent assassins preying upon us all. It seems that legislators heard that message and decided, ‘Okay…we’d already decided to get rid of the $200 tax. If the NFA is useless, we might as well de-list suppressors altogether.”

Don’t pop any champagne corks yet. The B³ now moves to the Senate where they will put their own stamp on the legislation, changing it in ways we can’t possibly predict. Whatever comes out of the Senate will then have to be reconciled with the House version. Nothing happens until it happens.

Whatever. To get this far was a very big win, and one that few of us thought was actually possible. One that appears to have been the result of a lot of pro-gun orgs whipping up their membership who then burned up a lot of phones on Capitol Hill. We’ll be watching the process in the Senate, and so should you.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

13 thoughts on “House Passes Reconciliation Bill Removing Suppressors From the NFA”

  1. Wow, they actually did it. Everyone needs to contact their senators. Why is no one talking about removing short-barreled rifles? Is the gun lobby not pushing for that? Is there too much money being made selling braces as a workaround? Tell your senators to remove sbr/sbs regs!

    Who were the nays? I assume one is Massie.

    1. Yep.

      Representative Thomas Massie of Kentucky and Representative Warren Davidson of Ohio. Representative Andy Harris of Maryland, the chair of the House Freedom Caucus, voted “present.” Two Republicans, Representatives David Schweikert of Arizona and Andrew Garbarino of New York, did not vote.

    2. Geoff "I'm getting too old for this shit" PR

      “Wow, they actually did it.”

      I’m shocked as well, and pleasantly.

      I will say this – We got screwed by ‘ObamaCare’ via the reconciliation process, so it’s about damn time we returned the favor to them.

      Then again, I suppose there’s nothing stopping them from putting them right back on the NFA the next time they hold all three houses of Congress…

    3. Geoff "I'm getting too old for this shit" PR

      I’d like to know what our chances are of it making it all the way to the finish line at this point…

      1. Peegee's Ghost

        Whatever happens from here at the Federal/NFA level, there’s zero chance Newsom and the Democrats here in CA will ever allow them. Remember folks…here in the DPRK it’s legal to possess a hunting rifle, and legal to possess a “low light imaging scope”, but illegal to connect the two because – in our legal code’s own words – the action somehow Pokemons itself into its next evolution known in our Penal Code as a “sniper rifle”.

        When I was in OK visiting someone, I noticed ASP collapsible batons being sold off the shelf right next to pepper spray and other accessories in the Women’s Sports section (presumably for self defense for women who jog/run). Yet in CA, mere possession by non-LE is a felony.

        So yeah…I’m rooting for suppressors to be removed from the NFA as much as anyone, but here it won’t make any difference.

        – IHAQ

        1. Geoff "I'm getting too old for this shit" PR

          “So yeah…I’m rooting for suppressors to be removed from the NFA as much as anyone, but here it won’t make any difference.”

          We rammed 50-state concealed carry down their throats, so it’s possible with cans.

          All we have to do is point out they aren’t controlled in Europe, and all they want is to do it like Europe does it…

          1. Peegee's Ghost

            “We rammed 50-state concealed carry down their throats, so it’s possible with cans.”

            [California’s Unsafe Gun Roster has entered the chat…]

  2. Representative Gerry Connelly (D-Virginia) passed away yesterday on 5/21/25.

    It is a simple fact that if he was still alive, his No vote would have killed this thing.

    1. “Representative Gerry Connelly (D-Virginia) passed away yesterday on 5/21/25.”

      That makes him a good democrat. Good and dead…

      *Snicker* 😉

    1. Those would be Thomas Massie KY, Warren Davidson OH, and Andy Harris MD.

      Andrew Gabarino NY and David Schweikert AZ did not vote but both men claimed they would have voted Yes. Gabarino fell asleep in Congress while the bill was still being debated and didn’t wake up in time to submit his vote (seriously I didn’t make this up). I’m unclear why Schweikert didn’t vote, one of Mike Johnson’s comments implies he didn’t turn his paper in on time or something like that.

Scroll to Top