Media, Gun Control Industry OUTRAGED by HHS Children’s Health Report That Doesn’t Mention Guns

angry woman retro vintage cartoon

The recently released Make Our Children Healthy Again report by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services should be required reading for parents of all types. Contained within its 20 pages are scores of topics that are designed to help parents improve their children’s health. 

The report examines an increase of childhood chronic diseases. It explains how processed foods can harm kids, as well as what’s behind what it calls the “American Children’s Food Crisis.” The authors scrutinize toxic chemicals in the environment, as well as why children are “uniquely vulnerable to environmental chemicals.” 

The work even examines the decline of physical activity that’s growing among today’s youth, as well as “overmedicalization” and the problems it creates. 

Unfortunately, rather than praising Kennedy, his team and their months of hard work, the anti-gunners and their media accomplices were incredibly displeased over one issue: Nowhere within the  20 pages does Kennedy’s report include the word “gun.” 

“Kennedy commission child health report ignores gun violence, the leading cause of child death,” screamed a story published Tuesday by Los Angeles Times staff writer Corinne Purtill. 

 “Absent from the document was any mention of guns, the leading cause of death for people under the age of 18,” Purtill wrote. “Firearms have been the leading cause of death for children ages 1 to 17 every year since 2022.”

As “proof,” Purtill links to a 2022 study by the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health’s Center for Gun Violence Solutions. Suffice it to say that report, like most of the anti-gun publications the Center has published, was debunked years ago. 

As you can imagine, the young reporter then turns to a stable of so-called experts to help support her faulty theory. 

Purtill turned first to Bruce Mirkin, who according to his LinkedIn page, works parttime as a ” Writer, Media Relations Consultant, Maker of Trouble.”  

“If you’re putting out a report that’s supposed to address how to help our children stay healthier, and you’re not even mentioning the No. 1 cause of childhood deaths, you ought to be embarrassed,” Purtill quoted Mirkin as saying. 

She never mentioned that Mirkin’s nonprofit has only existed for 10 months, or that his degree from Pomona College obtained in 1978 was a BA in theater. He has no science background whatsoever, which forced Mirkin to admit his error on LinkedIn. 

“I usually avoid being spokesperson for Defend Public Health, preferring to defer to our science and medical folks, but today I had to step into the breach to give a comment for this excellent L.A. Times article,” Mirkin was forced to post. 

Purtill then turned to an actual doctor for his comments about the new report, Dr. Adam Ratner, whom she described as a “New York pediatric infectious-disease specialist.”  

“By ignoring guns as a leading cause of childhood mortality and focusing instead on stigmatizing medication use, Kennedy’s strategy will endanger children while doing nothing to address the root of the problem,” Dr. Ratner told the reporter. 

But like Mirkin, Dr. Ratner wasn’t a neutral expert. In fact, Ratner had strongly opposed Kennedy becoming HHS secretary since he was sworn in. In an interview on National Public Radio’s Fresh Air, which held in February, Ratner made his opinion of Secretary Kennedy very well known. 

“To start, I want to be clear that my comments about RFK and about everything that we talk about today are my personal opinion and aren’t the – meant to represent the institutions I work for or anyone else I’m affiliated with. The – it’s very disconcerting. It’s very disturbing that someone who has spent so much of his career trying to undermine confidence in vaccines, trying to tear down the infrastructure that approves and recommends vaccines, has the potential to be in a position of power over the infrastructure that has those goals,” Ratner said. 

The Commission members who produced the Make Our Children Healthy Again report, which Kennedy chaired, are a heady bunch. They include the secretaries of Agriculture, Housing and Urban Development, Education, Veterans Affairs, the EPA, the OMB and many more. It’s truly a formidable group. 

To be clear, the authors never mentioned auto accident deaths or swimming pool drownings either. It’s a medical report. 

If a journalist wants to show that the work the commission produced is somehow deficient, maybe she should have used voices more potent than an aging thespian and a physician with an axe to grind to support her narrative.

 

The Second Amendment Foundation’s Investigative Journalism Project wouldn’t be possible without you. Click here to make a tax deductible donation to support pro-gun stories like this.

This story is part of the Second Amendment Foundation’s Investigative Journalism Project and is published here with their permission.

Leave a Reply to Reed Griffin Cancel Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

14 thoughts on “Media, Gun Control Industry OUTRAGED by HHS Children’s Health Report That Doesn’t Mention Guns”

    1. According to the CDC (in their stats from 2023) ‘mortality’ – Leading causes of death:

      Leading cause of death – Children ages 1-4 years – Accidents (unintentional injuries)
      Leading cause of death – Children ages 5-9 years – Accidents (unintentional injuries)
      Leading cause of death – Children ages 10-14 years – Accidents (unintentional injuries)

      https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/fastats/child-health.htm

      1. in addition to the above:

        The new trick by anti-gun is to include ‘adolescents’ which is a (somewhat vague term when applied age 18 and up) for an an age range from age 10 – early 20’s (up to mid 20’s). But age 18 and up for ‘medical mortality’ (i.e death) and legally are adults. That’s how they are inflating their numbers in ‘studies’ now. This is how they are getting around the anti-gun previous and debunked false claim, with a new false claim because they are still including age 18 and up as ‘children’ because ages 10 -17 includes children. Its their same old ‘numbers tricks’ to keep the lie going.

        If we exclude children ages 1 – 14, whose leading cause of death is, as stated in CDC stats, Accidents (unintentional injuries). This leaves ages 15 – 17.

        According to the CDC (in their stats from 2023) ‘mortality’ – Leading causes of death:

        Leading cause of death – adolescents ages 15–19 years – Accidents (unintentional injuries)

        https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/fastats/adolescent-health.htm

        Accidents (unintentional injuries)

        1. So according to the CDC (in their stats from 2023) ‘mortality’ …The Leading cause of death ages 1- 17 is – Accidents (unintentional injuries)

          This statement from the moron in the article is a lie > “Firearms have been the leading cause of death for children ages 1 to 17 every year since 2022.”

          This statement portion is also a lie > (firearms are..)”…the leading cause of death for people under the age of 18”

          This statement portion is also a lie > “…
          By ignoring guns as a leading cause of childhood mortality…”

  1. They could release a firearms only report including the gang members the left keep disingenuously call “children” and label their deaths as caused by “key Democrat voting blocks.”

    We should be honest about the deaths and injuries caused by Democrats and their voters.

    1. The new trick by anti-gun is to include ‘adolescents’ which is a (somewhat vague term when applied age 18 and up) for an an age range from age 10 – early 20’s (up to mid 20’s). But age 18 and up for ‘medical mortality’ (i.e death) and legally are adults. That’s how they are inflating their numbers in ‘studies’ now. This is how they are getting around the anti-gun previous and debunked false claim, with a new false claim because they are still including age 18 and up as ‘children’ because ages 10 -17 includes children. Its their same old ‘numbers tricks’ to keep the lie going.

  2. naturally like your web site however you need to take a look at the spelling on several of your posts. A number of them are rife with spelling problems and I find it very bothersome to tell the truth on the other hand I will surely come again again.

    1. I didn’t notice any spelling mistakes, however I can excuse non-professional writers having a typo every now and then. If that’s what’s keeping you from discerning the truth, read more and improve your reading skill. My brain fills in the blanks.

      1. you replied to a link-spammer. They post nonsense like that hoping the post will not be noticed, the link is in the user name (put your mouse cursor over it)

  3. Unfortunately, there are many more like her who published findings with no basis. Please keep on the debunking the unintelligent misinformed media

  4. Huge 2A Victory! DOJ Drops Magazine Ban.

    Big news out of Washington, D.C.! For nearly two decades, the District has enforced a strict ban on ‘high-capacity’ magazines holding more than 10 rounds. But now the U.S. Attorney’s Office has declared it unconstitutional — and says it will no longer prosecute people under this law.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kqPLGNR8qYo

  5. …while doing nothing to address the root of the problem

    Yet these people are never willing to look into the actual root causes. Firearm ownership increased in the 90s and 2000s as violent crime decreased. Many decades ago, you didn’t have all of these firearm regulations, yet we had less violent crime. Why are these people scared to notice what has changed since the 60s? Answer: 1) They know it won’t fit their narrative, and 2) They know the Left is responsible for pushing society to this point. They’re still promoting those ideas to this day: feminism beyond first wave, welfare state, anti-nuclear family and anti-objective morality. This has led to the general degradation of our society.

  6. I’ve been a gun guy for all of my 71 years, and the only child I ever knew of being injured by a firearm, other than some pinched fingers, was a neighborhood kid who decided to self inflict a .22 wound on his shoulder because he, “wanted to know what it is like to be shot” He found out. I have, however, known at least three drowning victims and several car deaths. If I was asked what is more likely, I would choose the latter. There are guns everywhere where I live and nobody gets shot. People teach gun safety here. Perhaps it is a problem with with city folk.

Scroll to Top