‘Deeply Respectful of the 2A’: Likely Presidential Candidate Gavin Newsom Has a Big Decision to Make

California Governor Gavin Newsom
Gage Skidmore, CC BY-SA 3.0, via Wikimedia Commons

California Gov. Gavin Newsom has a major decision to make and it’s steeped in pure politics. He’s got a bill to consider that would ban striker-fired handguns – just like the one he was gifted by Shawn Ryan when he appeared on the Shawn Ryan Show podcast.

The governor prides himself on being the strongest gun control governor in the country and has never seen a policy to restrict Second Amendment rights that he didn’t love. Who can forget his ill-fated media ploy in 2023 to export California-style gun control to the rest of the country through the introduction of a 28th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution? That included a kitchen sink grab-bag of policies that included raising the minimum age to buy a firearm by three years, implementing universal background checks and a federal gun registry and banning modern sporting rifles, among other provisions.

Gavin Newsom gun SIG SAUER P365 XMACRO

The governor claimed his proposed amendment “leaves the Second Amendment unchanged” and “respects America’s gun-owning tradition.” If you believe that, I’ve got a Golden Gate Bridge to sell you.

Now that California legislators have sent a bill to his desk, will his signature enact one of the most restrictive handgun bans in history and risk future presidential aspirations, or will he let the bill die and draw the ire of his gun control activist political base?

The clock is ticking, Gov. Newsom.

Handgun Ban

California Assembly Bill 1127 (AB 1127) passed the state Senate and, through some serious political gymnastics, the legislature suspended the rules to remain in session on a weekend and past the scheduled end-of-session deadline just so they could send the bill to the governor’s desk for his possible signature.

AB 1127 seeks to ban the sale of striker-fired pistols that criminals are capable of illegally altering and modifying by affixing an already illegal “machinegun conversion device” (GLOCK switches) to illegally manufacture a machinegun. The bill is set to take effect July 1, 2026, if signed by Gov. Newsom.

The bill essentially bans the most commonly owned types of handguns available to regular law-abiding Californians. Cam Edwards at Bearing Arms noted the bill language requires that handgun makers must be “California compliant,” thus making it all but impossible to purchase a striker-fire handgun.

“In my opinion, the amendment is a cheap gimmick to make the anti-gun politicians who voted in favor of this ban appear reasonable, because most folks have no clue about the ins-and-outs of California’s interconnected gun control schemes,” Edwards wrote.

Does Gov. Newsom really want to own this extreme of a gun ban ahead of a likely presidential campaign? If he’s “deeply respectful of the Second Amendment,” as he reassured Shawn Ryan on his podcast, is he at peace banning so many options of popular handguns that would no longer be available for law-abiding Californians to buy? That would include – for regular Californians – the same handgun former Vice President Kamla Harris claimed to own when she was asked by Oprah Winfrey during the 2024 presidential campaign. The former vice president, of course, likely owns her firearm under a special carveout that’s not available to most Californians.

Kamala Harris and her GLOCK pistol handgun

The California governor might not be aware that of the more than 26.2 million new first-time gun buyers over the past five years, the largest and fastest growing demographic of gun owners during that stretch was African American women who were largely buying striker-fired 9mm handguns, that make up a significant portion of the market. Is he going to stand by his record of banning the most-popular types of handguns purchased by the fastest-growing population of law-abiding gun owners in the country, who are also largely Democratic voters?

More Gun Control is In the Governor’s Future

Unfortunately, AB 1127 isn’t the only gun control bill awaiting Gov. Newsom. Also on the menu is SB 704, which would institute required background checks on the purchase of stand-alone gun barrels. But California already bans the possession of unserialized, homebuilt firearms and “precursor parts,” so SB 704 appears to be an admission or a fix to an existing gun control law that lawmakers have realized didn’t work after all.

That also becomes a slippery slope and it’s easy to foresee future laws to implement background checks for firearm “parts,” not just firearms themselves.

Also on the governor’s desk is AB 1078, which shifts California’s one-handgun-per-month gun rationing law to a three-guns-per-month limit. No surprises there, but it’s a callous move as a gun rationing law is still a rationing law. Federal courts already struck down the first rationing law as a violation of the Second Amendment. Should Gov. Newsom sign AB 1078 into law it will certainly be challenged in court on exactly the same grounds as before. There is simply no history or tradition in America of rationing the exercise of the Second Amendment.

What Will Newsom Do?

Gov. Newsom is undoubtedly thinking ahead to a potential 2028 presidential campaign and working through the political calculus of AB 1127. He’s never met a gun control bill he didn’t like, even if it meant he was on the losing end of immediate and successful court challenges…with taxpayers footing the bill, of course.

It’s highly likely the governor will sign the unconstitutional AB1127 gun ban bill into law. That would certainly placate the gun control industry activists in his political base, including Everytown for Gun Safety, Moms Demand Action and others. If he does that, it will be met swiftly by a legal challenge from NSSF.

The governor claimed he is “deeply respectful of the Second Amendment” when he spoke with Shawn Ryan. Enacting a wide-net handgun ban that wouldn’t reduce crime in his state – along with his long track record in the public domain and his attempt to enact his gun control 28th Amendment – one can’t help but laugh at that claim.

Gov. Newsom may feel a lot of things about the Second Amendment, but “respectful” isn’t one of them.

Time will tell, and NSSF will be watching.

 

Leave a Reply to Stephen Cancel Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

8 thoughts on “‘Deeply Respectful of the 2A’: Likely Presidential Candidate Gavin Newsom Has a Big Decision to Make”

  1. Let’s get this out of the way now. gavin isn’t worried about the oval office. Unless he’s as retarded as miner49er he must know he has zero chance of getting elected. The fascist left has lost. Biggly.

    Likely he will just do what he considers ‘payback’ on law abiding citizens for not supporting the fascist left.

    1. jwm,

      Perhaps you, like others not painfully familiar with the antics of Governor Hair Gel, are laboring under the quaint delusion that Hair Gel HAS any ‘principles’, Left, right, or otherwise. Hair Gel exists and operates under one principle, and one principle only – whatever gets him ahead and/or makes him money. Having grown up in the swamps of Bay Area CA politics, that of course meant he glommed onto whatever Leftist/fascist trend seemed to be au courant at the time . . . only to abandon it when it was convenient.

      Don’t like Hair Gel’s principles??? That’s OK, he has others, if needed. So, to call him a Leftist is to slander true Leftist/fascists like MajorSkidmark, who truly are dyed-in-the-wool, bugf*ck nuts Leftists. The only thing Greasy Gavin is devoted to is Greasy Gavin, and his mirror. I can’t tell if he’s stupid, or just aware that his potential CA voting base is stupid, but he sure plays stupid well on TV.

      1. Lamp. I’m well aware. I live in the Bay Area. gavin can’t even keep water in the fire hydrants. He’s going nowhere towards the oval office.

  2. I’m very happy with my SA/DA ruger p89, 17+1 capacity handgun. Also my SW Model 36 five shot revolver. From the 1960s is pretty good too.

    I understand the g@.ys still support the Mulford Act. The leadership certainly does. Since they elected them.

    I do like the gen 3 glock. For a switch.

  3. I simply could not go away your web site prior to suggesting that I really enjoyed the standard info a person supply on your guests Is going to be back incessantly to investigate crosscheck new posts

  4. This puts him in a bad spot. I think he has to sign it, but we’ll see. He isn’t going to win over many gun owners who aren’t already voting for Dems, no matter what he does. He can’t afford to lose support from the hardcore Left. Kamala lost some votes over the Gaza issue.

  5. In the picture of kamala with her gun she has her finger on the trigger showing a complete disregard of standard gun safety rules. As for newsum he will do whatever he thinks is best for him and no one else.

Scroll to Top