No Democrat is Too Violent for Everytown…as Long as They Promise to Back More Gun Control Laws
Maybe Everytown is hoping that if it remains silent, people will overlook or soon forget its June endorsement of Jones
Maybe Everytown is hoping that if it remains silent, people will overlook or soon forget its June endorsement of Jones
The judge’s remark, perhaps unintentionally, casts aspersions on tens of millions of law-abiding gun owners who own firearms for personal protection and the defense of their families and other loved ones.
Don’t look for much media coverage of this part of the story of the terrorist attack in Jerusalem this morning. Stories of armed citizens stopping crazed killers are…inconvenient.
“Prohibiting whole groups of people from owning firearms because a sick individual misused a gun to kill children is as reprehensible as restricting the rights of all law-abiding citizens because some people have committed crimes.”
“What we do know is that her husband was able to stop the killer from committing further violence because he had a firearm with which he was able to fight back.”
“Constitutional rights are not up to a public vote, which the 9th Circuit panel recognizes, even if he doesn’t. Neither are rights subject to essentially getting permission from the state, via a background check, in order for citizens to exercise them.”
“We will wait with bated breath for Gov. Newsom to announce he has completed all of the California requirements and then he can show us a sample of his safety and marksmanship skills, which should be rather enlightening.”
“We’re delighted that officials in Dumont, a borough in Bergen County, have adopted Resolution 2025-216 to eliminate the municipal portion of the permit fee,” said CCRKBA Managing Director Andrew Gottlieb.
The report fails to mention a major reason people leave their firearms in their cars…the proliferation of ‘gun-free zones’ and ‘sensitive areas,’ all promoted by the same social justice extremists who complain about guns falling into the wrong hands.
As we state in the letter, the result would be a super-entity of gun control enforcers which could be used by future anti-gun administrations to target the Second Amendment community in unprecedented ways.