DOJ Lawsuit Accuses Virgin Islands’ Incompetent PD of Ignoring Bruen, Systematically Violating Citizens’ Gun Rights

US Virgin Islands Police Department Bigstock

The U.S. Virgin Islands offer some of the world’s best beaches, such as Magens Bay and Coki Beach, where you can swim with sea turtles if you’re lucky. There is parasailing, kayaking, shopping and gobs of tropical food and drink. For the most part, the tourist areas are relatively safe, at least during the day. The Virgin Islands Police Department tries to make sure of that. 

Most Americans spend only a few hours in the Virgin Islands after their cruise ship docks near Havensight Mall and lets them off right next to cheap duty-free shops. Truth is, they’re lucky they can leave. Residents and longtime visitors face an unbelievably high amount of violent crime. In fact, the USVI has consistently maintained one of the worst violent crime rates in the world. 

Unfortunately, the Virgin Islands Police Department has done nothing to stop the hundreds of shootings and killings that occur each year, because the VIPD is busy shooting and killing folks themselves. 

In March 2003, I was an investigative reporter at the Virgin Islands Daily News. I wrote “Deadly Force–A Special Investigative Report,” which was 44 pages long and examined the Virgin Islands Police Department’s officer-involved shootings from January 1985 to December 2003.

It found:

  • In the 85 shooting incidents reviewed, 65 of the victims were unarmed.
  • The 85 police shootings resulted in the deaths of 28 people.
  • Only 17 of the people who were shot by police and survived were charged.
  • VIPD records unit lacked information about involved officers, victims and the results of any investigation into the shootings.
  • VIPD employed an outdated use of force policy that included illegal guidance indicating that deadly force could be used to protect property.
  • In at least six cases VIPD officers shot at moving vehicles.
  • One shooting occurred while the officer was off duty and drunk in a bar. He was cleared. 

The Justice Department liked the special report, but it didn.t like the findings. At all. 

“The report included descriptions of 77 cases in which either officers had allegedly pointed or fired their weapons under questionable circumstances or the case files related to the shooting incidents contained little or no information reflecting that any investigation of the use of force was conducted. The report also summarized 20 cases in which VIPD officers, often off-duty at the times of the incidents, brandished or fired weapons during personal arguments or fights,” the DOJ said in a press release. “The disturbing and unflattering portrait presented by the ‘Deadly Force’ report was one of a police department whose officers were poorly trained, too quick to use firearms, and immune from serious consequences for improper and in some cases illegal uses of deadly force. The article called for various actions to be taken in response to its findings, including an investigation by the Special Litigation Section of DOJ’s Civil Rights Division.”

The DOJ sent its Special Litigation Section to investigate. The SLS, which has never lost a case, confirmed everything we had found, and more.

Ultimately, the DOJ and the VIPD signed a consent decree a few years after the special report was published. It blasted Virgin Islands police officers for their “use of force, vehicle pursuits, holding cells, misconduct investigations, discipline, supervisory oversight, and training.”

It takes most American police departments between five to seven years to fix everything found wrong by federal investigators. However, today—more than 22 years after the first story was published—the VIPD still remains under close federal supervision, because they have not made adequate changes to a series of consent decrees that would end the civil case.

The case itself has thousands of court entries—it’s more than two decades old, after all.

Despite the VI’s incredible crime rates, personal firearms are against the law. Unless you’re a gangster or one of the territory’s dozens of unicameral senators, or a senator’s spouse or child, getting caught with a firearm almost always leads to prison. 

The U.S. Virgin Islands has the worst gun laws of any state or territory under the American flag.  “Possessing or carrying an unlicensed firearm is an offense subjecting an individual to a term of imprisonment of not less than ten years, and/or a fine not less than $10,000 nor more than $15,000,” the lawsuit states. 

A new federal lawsuit 

On Tuesday, Harmeet K. Dhillon, the Assistant Attorney General for Civil Rights at the U.S. Department of Justice, announced a new lawsuit against the government of the U.S. Virgin Islands, the VIPD and Mario Brooks, police commissioner of the territory.

Harmeet Dhillon

The lawsuit is damning. 

It alleges that the government caused “unreasonable delays and conditions on lawful gun owners’ rights create an unconstitutional permitting process in violation of the Second Amendment. Numerous applicants complained that VIPD is unreasonably delaying their gun permit application decisions and added unreasonable conditions, including bolted-in gun safes, prior to issuing gun licenses. Finally, VIPD continues to enforce a proper cause regulation nearly identical to the law that the U.S. Supreme Court previously struck down in another case years ago.”

“This Civil Rights Division will protect the Second Amendment rights of law-abiding citizens,” Dhillon said in the press release. “The newly-established Second Amendment Section filed this lawsuit to bring the Virgin Islands Police Department back into legal compliance by ensuring that applicants receive timely decisions without unconstitutional obstruction.”

Adam Sleeper, U.S. Attorney for the District of the U.S. Virgin Islands, strongly agreed with her. 

“The territory’s firearms licensing laws and practices are inconsistent with the Second Amendment,” Sleeper wrote. “This lawsuit seeks to uphold the rights of law-abiding citizens to bear arms in the U.S. Virgin Islands.”

The pair asked Virgin Islanders who were concerned that their Second Amendment right were violated to submit a complaint through justice.gov/crt/second-amendment-section.

According to the complaint, the “Second and the Fourteenth Amendments protect the right of law-abiding citizens to possess a handgun at home and to carry one outside the home for lawful purposes such as self-defense.” 

However, despite the U.S. Supreme Court’s “unequivocal and repeated endorsement of an individual right to keep and bear arms,” the “VI Defendants have continued to obstruct and systematically deny law-abiding American citizens this fundamental right by systematically delaying the processing of applications and imposing unconstitutional conditions on the exercise of this constitutional right.”  

At fault for nullifying the Second Amendment are the USVI, the VIPD and Police Commissioner Brooks, the lawsuit states. 

The complaint describes the lengthy and expensive process used to obtain a permit to possess a firearm in the Virgin Islands that included multiple unannounced home visits by VIPD, which the complaint refers to as “intrusive and warrantless home searches.”  

“They demand that applicants unnecessarily spend money to install a safe and further require the safe to be bolted either to the floor or wall of applicant’s home as a condition of granting a permit, even though in Heller, the Supreme Court held that a similar requirement is unconstitutional,” the complaint states. 

The lawsuit points out that even those residents who were willing to comply with all of the unconstitutional demands complained of delays caused by all of the police visits and paperwork. 

“This case concerns a coordinated effort by all three VI Defendants to nullify through unconstitutional, bureaucratic barriers a right that the Supreme Court of the United States has repeatedly recognized,” the complaint states. “The United States brings this action under the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994 to restore the Second Amendment rights of law-abiding citizens.”

In addition to the home inspections, the VIPD required anyone seeking a firearm permit to submit “character vouchers,” which describe the applicant as “a fit and proper person to have a firearm.” 

Further, the VIPD can deny additional firearm license applications if it determines the applicant has “too many” guns. 

If an applicant wants to actually carry a concealed firearm, they must produce additional witnesses, but the police commissioner can still determine whether the applicant has a “good reason” or “proper reason” to carry a concealed weapon. 

Guns galore 

Bad guys in the U.S. Virgin Islands are a well-armed bunch, and their weapons come from all over the world. 

I have personally seen full-auto AKs, M-16s, STENs, several types of Uzis, MAC-10s, M1 Carbines, handguns galore, shotguns with crudely sawed-off barrels, and even a live Mk 2 “Pineapple” grenade, which had to be at least 60 years old. 

The bad guys carry their arms every day. They don’t fear the police. VIPD knows exactly who they are—it’s a small territory—and leaves them alone. 

Organized crime in the territory is run by a group known as “The Commission,” which is headquartered on St. Croix, and their members are practically immune from prosecution.  

However, if a non-gang member or a tourist is caught with a firearm, they’re looking at years in prison. 

U.S. Virgin Islands Police Commissioner Mario Brooks
U.S. Virgin Islands Police Commissioner Mario Brooks
How will VIPD respond? 

Officially, at least, Government House said they’re aware of the DOJ’s Second Amendment complaint and that it’s under review. 

“Because this matter is pending litigation, we will not comment further at this time,” they said in a statement this week.

However, if you want to guess how VIPD will respond to the new DOJ complaint, look at how they responded to the old one. The VI government ignored it, for the most part, for more than two decades. They still are. 

The Virgin Islands are one of the most beautiful places under the U.S. flag, but violent crime has long been a massive problem and a serious concern. The only big difference today is Assistant Attorney General Dhillon and her new Second Amendment team. This lawsuit is their first official action, so of course they want to win. They’re under pressure, but the results will be worth the fight. 

It’s high time that all VI residents and visitors to have real Second Amendment rights. 

 

The Second Amendment Foundation’s Investigative Journalism Project wouldn’t be possible without you. Click here to make a tax deductible donation to support pro-gun stories like this.

This story is part of the Second Amendment Foundation’s Investigative Journalism Project and is published here with their permission.

Leave a Reply to Curtis Cancel Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

23 thoughts on “DOJ Lawsuit Accuses Virgin Islands’ Incompetent PD of Ignoring <em>Bruen</em>, Systematically Violating Citizens’ Gun Rights”

  1. A Question, I Haz

    I see. DOJ puts the Virgin Islands in its crosshairs for rights violations, but California and its naughty sibling the Ninth Circuit continues its 20+ year onslaught of jackbooting us while ignoring Heller, McDonald,, and Bruen with no real consequences. Over and over again.

    Trump, Bondi, Patel, the whole Federal LE burrito needs to press all its weight on CA and knock it all down collectively to restore our constitutionally protected rights. Litigatively nuke it from orbit. It’s the only way.

  2. URGENT: Congress Puts Pam Bondi & DOJ On Notice Over Defending NFA Registration.

    ht* tps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lzMSpFwAFFM

  3. UPDATE! Corruption Continues | Felonies for Self-Defense Against Town Official.

    ht* tps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RP3v6Es-v-I

    1. When Congress Tells the DOJ to Knock It Off [i.e. stop defending the NFA]

      We have already talked about a Congressional letter to AG Bondi that clearly communicated a desire to remove certain items from the requirements of the NFA. Washington Gun Law President, William Kirk, discusses a second letter, now sent to the AG, in direct response to the Attorney General’s strong desire to defend the NFA in two current lawsuits.

      ht* tps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lTharaZCPPc

  4. Calling up the citizen ‘militia’: MAJOR BREAKING NEWS! TRUMP TO DEPLOY NEWLY-FORMED SEA-MILITIA IF SENATOR PREVAILS!

    Senator Mike Lee has proposed issuing Letters of Marque to private citizens to combat the cartels. Mark Smith, Four Boxes Diner, discusses.

    ht* tps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QLE46rxwB3A

  5. Australia falls to tyranny – History repeats: After the Australia Mass Shooting, The Government Is Confiscating Guns Again.

    “Australia just announced another national gun buyback in response to a mass shooting—and if you’ve been paying attention, you already know how this story ends.

    After the Bondi attack, Prime Minister Anthony Albanese stood at a podium and did exactly what governments always do after tragedy:
    blame the public… and take more guns.

    But here’s the problem.

    Australia already did this in the 1990s.
    They banned firearms.
    They ran massive buybacks.
    They confiscated registered guns.
    They promised safety.

    And now—decades later—another mass shooting happens.

    Even worse? According to witnesses, police were already on scene and didn’t engage for nearly 30 minutes.
    Yet instead of explaining that failure, the government’s response is the same tired script:
    “We need to get more guns off the streets.”

    This video breaks down why:

    “Common-sense gun laws” never have an endpoint

    Gun buybacks don’t stop determined attackers

    Disarming civilians doesn’t prevent violence—it guarantees helplessness

    Governments use tragedy to expand control instead of fixing failure

    And why Australia’s response should be a warning, not a model

    This isn’t about Bondi alone.
    It’s about what happens after governments fail—and who pays the price for it.

    Because when the system freezes…
    and the police don’t act…
    and civilians are disarmed…

    You don’t get safety. You get control.”

    ht* tps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pYmZ0nWwbZ8

    1. Bondi Terror Attack Survivor Says Police Were More Concerned With This Than the Terrorists.

      “Australia is reacting to the Bondi Beach terror attack as predicted: they’re pushing more gun control again, and they’re refusing to blame radical Islam for the attack. …

      One survivor, Vanessa Miller, described her harrowing ordeal, where she was separated from her three-year-old daughter during the attack. Pinned down, she tried to reach for an injured officer’s firearm to defend herself, but police were more concerned about her getting that weapon than the terrorists. She cooked them during an interview on The Erin Molan Show: …

      ‘These police officers were hiding behind a car… I tried to grab one of their guns. Another one grabbed me and said ‘no.’ I hope they are hearing this. You are weak. You could have saved so many more people’s lives. They were just watching this all happen, holding me back.’

      What happened at Bondi? Leibel Lazaroff, 20, from Texas, jumped on a wounded police officer and made a tourniquet out of his shirt. He heard the late Rabbi Eli Schlanger nearby screaming, ‘He is coming towards the van,’ and Leibel said to the officer, ‘Please! get him!’ The officer was too badly wounded to act. Leibel then said, ‘Give me your gun—I am licensed, I am trained, I know how to use it.’ At that point, Leibel was shot and wounded.

      He knew he would probably have been killed, but he was willing to take that risk. He watched his rabbi and mentor be murdered.

      Leibel is recovering in the ICU.
      …”

      [note: see linked article for video interviews of these survivors]

      ht* tps://townhall.com/tipsheet/mattvespa/2025/12/19/bondi-terror-attack-survivors-account-on-baffling-police-response-will-leave-you-seething-n2668097

      1. ‘Palestinians’ furious at Muslim who tackled Bondi Beach jihadi, call him a ‘traitor’.

        ht* tps://jihadwatch.org/2025/12/palestinians-furious-at-muslim-who-tackled-bondi-beach-jihadi-call-him-a-traitor

  6. Whoopsie! Careful what you wish for – Epstein files released, and it doesn’t look too good for democrats. Previously, deceptive democrats released some pics without context trying to imply wrong doing on the part of Trump. They did this by deceptively covering faces in the pics of women trying to imply they were victims of wrong doing by Trump involved with Epstein and implying the pics were somehow from the ‘Epstein files’. But the actual un-redacted pics were discovered and it turns out, like we knew, that the democrats lied as the women were models with a suntan lotion company that happen to have posed with Trump when he was in the area at one point…but anyway, despite Bill Clinton denials in the past it turns out he was pretty chummy with Epstein and Maxwell and ‘the victims and minor girls’…

    Epstein Files Have Been Released, And Democrats Won’t Like These Photos.

    ht* tps://pjmedia.com/matt-margolis/2025/12/19/epstein-files-released-and-democrats-wont-like-these-photos-n4947310

    [note: in the linked article, the pics, the blacked out faces are either victims or minors. Per the Epstein Files Transparency Act, DOJ was specifically instructed only to redact the faces of victims and/or minors.]

      1. Epstein Victims Aren’t Happy With Democrats. Here’s Why.

        “For months, Democrats have fancied themselves to be champions of Epstein victims, framing their push to release documents as a righteous quest for justice. But victims themselves are calling out the charade. They see what’s really happening: House Democrats are weaponizing the Epstein files against Trump, while treating victims like collateral damage.

        In recent weeks, Democrats on the House Oversight Committee have released cherry-picked emails and photos that served no other purpose than to give the false impression that Trump was connected to Jeffrey Epstein’s criminal activities. The problem? Their strategy backfired spectacularly. The new revelations have instead highlighted connections to people in the Democratic orbit, making their partisan exploitation of the files look even more cynical. For example, last month, Democrats leaked a small batch of curated, doctored emails they believed would damage Trump. Republicans responded by releasing more than 20,000 emails, shattering that narrative. The fallout ensnared Larry Summers, Bill Clinton’s former Treasury secretary and an Obama economic adviser, along with Virgin Islands Delegate Stacey Plaskett, Obama White House counsel Kathryn Ruemmler, and even House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries.
        …”

        ht* tps://pjmedia.com/matt-margolis/2025/12/20/epstein-victims-arent-happy-with-democrats-heres-why-n4947319

    1. Bill Clinton Panics After Latest Epstein Release Shows Him With Victims.

      [Note: lets get this straight. The Biden admin had this stuff for four years and didn’t release it, nor did they ever release anything from it that implicated Trump in any wrong doing. Now, Trump gets into a second term and the Democrats start screaming about releasing the Epstein files and go on a rampage with all sorts of accusations and implying Trump had some wrong doing going on in relation to Epstein – yet, the democrats on committees have seen the Epstein files in both the Biden admin era and now in Trumps second term and know there is nothing that implicates Trump in wrong doing in them, but in the Biden era despite having access to these files they did not release a single thing that implicated Trump in any wrong doing even though they were scrambling for anything to ‘stop Trump’ and had to resort to making stuff up and bogus ‘lawfare’ tactics. Now that Trump is in his second term, the democrats scream for the Epstein files to be released as part of their ploy to undermine Trump, and the republicans and Trump called their bluff and are releasing the files – so now the democrats are upset and angry because democrat Bill Clinton is implicated in wrong doing in the Epstein files and not Trump – and the democrats got exactly what they were screaming for in their bluff, the release of the Epstein files – and now Clinton wants to blame Trump and claiming the timing of the release was ‘shady’.]

      Bill Clinton Panics After Latest Epstein Release Shows Him With Victims.



      Make no mistake, Bill Clinton is furious after a fresh release of Jeffrey Epstein files sent the internet into a frenzy on Friday. The newly published photos show Clinton swimming in a pool, lounging in a jacuzzi alongside victims, and more. The Justice Department released the massive tranche to meet the deadline imposed by the Epstein Files Transparency Act, the law President Trump signed last month.

      Clinton’s crew fired back fast with a statement that reeks of deflection, pinning the blame on Trump and the White House for some shady timing on the Friday dump.
      …”

      https://pjmedia.com/matt-margolis/2025/12/20/bill-clinton-panics-after-latest-epstein-release-shows-him-with-victims-n4947322

  7. How ‘John’ the Homeless Guy Solved the Brown University Shooting. [turns out it wasn’t crafty skillful police work that solved the case – it was a homeless guy named ‘John’]

    ht* tps://townhall.com/tipsheet/mattvespa/2025/12/19/last-nights-presser-on-the-brown-university-shooter-took-many-wild-turns-n2668174

  8. Left wing violence: The Far Left Antifa Plan To Overthrow The US Government.

    “Yesterday on stream, we reviewed a new document from Antifa detailing the far left’s tactical plan for overthrowing the United States government.

    They discussed armed resistance and promoted violence.

    This is the highlight reel.
    …”

    ht* tps://karlyn.substack.com/p/the-far-left-antifa-plan-to-overthrow

    1. Left wing violence: New [violent] Militant Queer Document Calls For Violence.

      ht* tps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uiCQz1uZa7s

  9. Entirely predictable now isn’t it. What other American polities routinely screw up the Constitution like these guys. I’m making a list.

  10. Went there 40 years ago… couldn’t take anything with me but two of us stopped a purse snatcher in Charlotte. Ran him down. Cops came and took him away and my wife got the purse and gave it back to the lady… in all my vacations I HAVE NEVER SEEN ANY CRIME… except in the Virgin Islands!!! Where I could not have a gun!

    I want my Texas LTC to be legal in ANY state or territory of the USA.. and my gun not needed to be registered before I can carry it there!!!!

    Let’s hope the lawsuits today AND Congress makes this possible.

  11. This looks quite damning. It looks like an ‘on the take’ VIPD is keeping citizens defenseless lest they endanger the local mob thugs.

Scroll to Top