Democrat U.S. Senator Chris Coons is at it again. While Americans focus on the SAVE America Act, anti-gun Democrats in Washington are quietly trying to hijack the bill with a backdoor gun control amendment that strikes directly at your Second Amendment rights.
What This Amendment Actually Does
Coons’ Amendment 4655 would effectively outlaw nearly all private firearm sales and transfers in the United States. Under this proposal, you would no longer be free to sell, gift, or transfer a firearm to another law-abiding citizen without federal government involvement.
Instead, nearly every transfer would be forced through a federally licensed dealer. That means:
- Government paperwork
- Permanent records
- Federal oversight of private transactions
Coons’ amendment states: “It shall be unlawful…to transfer a firearm…unless a licensed dealer has first taken possession of the firearm.”
In plain English, it’s the same universal gun registration scheme that Texas Gun Rights has been warning Texans about for years. This creates a paper trail for nearly every firearm transfer in America — the exact foundation needed for a national gun registry.
And gun owners know what comes next.
Registration Leads to Confiscation
History is clear. Gun registration has always been the precursor to confiscation. Always. And this amendment pushes the United States one step closer to that reality, all under the false banner of “common sense.”
Law-Abiding Gun Owners Are the Target
Criminals won’t follow this law.
- They won’t use FFLs.
- They won’t file paperwork.
- They won’t ask permission.
Coons’ amendment doesn’t stop crime. It targets you, the law-abiding gun owner. It could even create legal gray areas for temporary transfers between friends or family, turning responsible Americans into criminals overnight.
The Gun Confiscation Agenda Is Escalating
This is how the gun confiscation lobby operates. They don’t always come for your rights all at once. They chip away one amendment, one restriction, one “small step” at a time, hoping gun owners don’t notice until it’s too late.
But Texas Gun Rights is paying attention.
BREAKING NEWS: US Attorney General Pam Bondi (reportedly) FIRED!
ht* tps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lO-SqFccpTo
Federalist 50: Madison’s Warning About Runaway Government & Why 2A Matters.
“In this video, I break down Federalist No. 50 and explain why James Madison warned against trusting government to correct its own constitutional violations after the fact. We’ll look at Madison’s argument about periodic appeals to the people, why structure matters more than occasional outrage, and how this paper connects to the broader constitutional principles that also support the Second Amendment.”
ht* tps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L0mESdLtMZ4
From stabbing his own sister to attempted murder – the state let it happen!
“A man is shoved toward an oncoming train in Seattle… and he barely survives.
But here’s the part that should make your blood boil:
The attacker wasn’t some unknown threat. He had a history of violence. The system knew exactly who he was—and still let him walk free.
This wasn’t random. This was preventable.
In this video, we break down exactly what happened, how this individual ended up back on the streets, and why policies meant to “protect” society are doing the exact opposite.
We’re also talking about something most people won’t say out loud:
👉 Why you are ultimately responsible for your own safety
👉 Why “gun-free zones” don’t stop real threats
👉 And what this incident proves about being prepared in public spaces
Because when seconds matter… no one is coming to save you.”
ht* tps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SJy1rbCHSNI
Hegseth: Military Bases Are No Longer Gun-Free Zones.
“Secretary of War Pete Hegseth has overturned the controversial rule banning firearms from military installations.
Up until now, it was nearly impossible for servicemen to obtain permission to carry personal firearms on military posts and bases. That is about the change. ‘Not all enemies are foreign, nor are they all outside our borders,’ said Hegseth in an April 2 video. ‘Some are domestic. Confirming your God-given right to self protection is what I’m signing into action today. And I’m proud to do so.’
…”
ht* tps://pjmedia.com/catherinesalgado/2026/04/02/hegseth-military-bases-are-no-longer-gun-free-zones-n4951393
Another comedy routine bough to us by the mental illness of the left wing: Anti-ICE Activists on Patrol Approaching Cars and Demanding Badges, IDs, or Warrants
ht* tps://twitchy.com/brettt/2026/04/01/anti-ice-activists-on-patrol-approaching-cars-and-demanding-badges-ids-or-warrants-n2426713
Public service – Murder spree ended by home owner/occupant: Double Murder Suspect Shot Dead After Trying to Break Into Mississippi Home.
“Key Takeaways
Chris Hughes, 41, was shot and killed while trying to force his way into a home in Kosciusko, MS.
He was wanted in connection with two fatal shootings that occurred earlier that day.
The identities of Hughes’s victims have not been released; all three deaths have been confirmed by the coroner.
The article discusses the importance of the right to defend oneself, particularly against known violent intruders.
The identity of the homeowner who shot Hughes remains undisclosed, as does the specifics of the fatal shot.
…”
ht* tps://www.usacarry.com/double-murder-suspect-shot-dead-after-trying-to-break-into-mississippi-home/
Public Service – violent robbers defeated, but…. : Mall Robbery Turns Violent as Suspects Try to Disarm Victim – One Ends Up Shot, All Three Arrested
“HANOVER, MD – A man defended himself against a violent robbery attempt outside a Burlington Coat Factory store at Arundel Mills Mall on Saturday afternoon, shooting one of his attackers after suspects tried to take his legally carried handgun.
Anne Arundel County Police responded to the mall around 5:00 p.m. on March 28, 2026, following a report of shots fired. The victim, an adult male, told officers he was leaving the store’s vestibule when several suspects approached and began assaulting him.
During the attack, the victim attempted to draw his handgun. The suspects fought to take the firearm from him, and the gun discharged during the struggle, striking one of the attackers. The suspects then fled the mall with the victim’s handgun and cell phone. The victim sustained non-life-threatening injuries.
…
Armed Citizen Takeaway
This incident is a reminder of how quickly a situation can escalate when a firearm is introduced into a violent confrontation. The victim was targeted, assaulted, and his gun became part of the struggle. Retaining control of your firearm during a physical attack is a critical and often overlooked aspect of concealed carry training. Retention techniques and situational awareness in transitional spaces like parking lots and store entrances can make a life-or-death difference.
The right to carry a firearm for personal protection is a fundamental civil right. Situations like this one illustrate why that right matters for ordinary people going about their daily lives.”
ht* tps://www.usacarry.com/mall-robbery-turns-violent-as-suspects-try-to-disarm-victim-one-ends-up-shot-all-three-arrested/
GOA, GOF Secure Permanent Victory as New York Drops Social Media Requirement for Concealed Carry Permits.
“Key Takeaways
Gun Owners of America and Gun Owners Foundation achieved a legal victory as New York drops its social media disclosure requirement for concealed carry permits.
The settlement permanently blocks the enforcement of the law requiring applicants to submit three years of social media history.
Officials aim to ensure that the PPB-3 application no longer requests social media information from applicants.
Critics labeled the original requirement as an invasion of privacy and a violation of multiple amendments.
GOA and GOF will continue to challenge other restrictions under New York’s post-Bruen concealed carry law.
…”
ht* tps://www.usacarry.com/goa-gof-secure-permanent-victory-as-new-york-drops-social-media-requirement-for-concealed-carry-permits/
Someone in NY realized “hey, that application contains all the info needed for us to set up an AI to search all of it out without a trace. Why bother asking?”
USPS Moves to Allow Mailing Handguns After DOJ Says Federal Ban Is Unconstitutional.
ht* tps://www.ammoland.com/2026/04/usps-mailing-handguns-doj-ban-unconstitutional/
Gun Prohibitionists Using Pincer Strategy with Reports on U.S. Arms in Mexico.
ht* tps://www.ammoland.com/2026/04/gun-prohibitionists-using-pincer-strategy-with-reports-on-u-s-arms-in-mexico/
Metcalf’s Shotgun Returned After Ninth Circuit Tossed Billings Gun-Free School Zone Case.
“In the Gun Free School Zone case against Gabriel Metcalf in Billings, Montana, the authorities have returned Gabriel’s single-shot 20-gauge shotgun, an ammunition pouch, and the six rounds of 20-gauge ammunition that were seized when Gabriel was arrested on August 23, 2023.
The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled the case illegitimate and remanded it to the District Court with instructions to dismiss. The Ninth Circuit opinion was sent to the District Court on September 23, 2025, just short of two years after Gabe was arrested.
…
[pic]
Officer Stroble returned Gabe’s shotgun, ammunition, and ammo pouch. He does not appear happy or friendly. …
…
t is not clear if the officers were acting on behalf of the Billings Police Force or the ATF/Billings Police Task Force. Gabe says Officer Stroble was the officer who arrested him two and a half years ago as an officer in the task force. The arrest was a federal arrest based on the federal Gun Free School Zone Act. The task force was used to arrest Gabe after the Billings police, on a local TV station, said they could not arrest Gabe because he was not breaking the law.
Gabriel won his case in the Federal Courts. The Ninth Circuit did not say the Gun Free School Zone law was unconstitutional. They said Gabe should never have been indicted and tried.
…
Gabe and his mother, Vivian, suffered significant damages during the two and a half years of punishment by process in the courts. Gabe spent a month in jail and years on probation. His mother stopped her business as a seamstress. Their budding recycling business was destroyed. Their reputation was damaged, relationships destroyed. …
…”
ht* tps://www.ammoland.com/2026/04/metcalfs-shotgun-returned-after-ninth-circuit-tossed-billings-gun-free-school-zone-case/
Judge Keeps One Plaintiff in Hanson v. District of Columbia Magazine Ban Case.
“On Monday, a federal judge dismissed all plaintiffs but one in a court case challenging Washington, D.C.’s standard capacity magazine ban.
In this case, Andrew Hanson et al. v. District of Columbia et al., U.S. District Court Judge Rudolph Contreras granted in part and denied in part the District’s partial motion to dismiss. The judge dismissed all the plaintiffs from the case, except Tyler Yzaguirre, leaving him to go in alone to defeat the ban.
The decision comes more than three and a half years after the lawsuit was filed and follows a tortuous path through preliminary injunction proceedings, an appeal to the D.C. Circuit, and a petition for certiorari denied by the U.S. Supreme Court. Until recently, the Nation’s Capital banned magazines holding more than ten rounds of ammunition under D.C. Code § 7-2506.01(b). D.C. refers to these magazines as “large capacity magazines” (LCMs).
Earlier this month, another case in front of a three-judge panel from the D.C. Court of Appeals struck down the ban by a margin of 2-1 in Benson v. the United States.
D.C. asked for an expedited en banc hearing, in which the decision would be vacated, and the full bench would rehear the case. The court denied the petition, meaning D.C. must go through the normal en banc process. The federal court acknowledged but said it does not yet moot the case because the plaintiffs are seeking damages and en banc review in Benson v. United States remains pending.
…”
ht* tps://www.ammoland.com/2026/03/judge-keeps-one-plaintiff-hanson-v-district-of-columbia-magazine-ban/
Supreme Court Asked to Stop New York’s Lawfare End-Run Around PLCAA.
“The fight over New York’s gun-industry liability law is getting bigger, and the message now reaching the U.S. Supreme Court is hard to miss: this is not just a trade dispute, and it is not just another blue-state consumer protection case dressed up in legal jargon. According to two major amicus briefs filed in support of certiorari in National Shooting Sports Foundation, Inc. v. Letitia James, New York is trying to do through lawfare what anti-gun politicians have failed to do through the normal legislative process—use the courts to choke off the lawful commerce in arms.
One of those briefs comes from the National Rifle Association, Second Amendment Foundation, American Suppressor Association, and Independence Institute. The other comes from Montana and 23 additional states. Together, they make a serious and layered argument:
New York’s statute is an attempt to sidestep the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act (PLCAA), revive the same kind of junk litigation Congress barred in 2005, and let one hostile state pressure gun makers and sellers across the country to live under New York’s anti-gun policies.
In the cert petition, petitioners tell the justices the real question is whether PLCAA’s narrow predicate exception can be stretched to let states bring the same tort-style lawsuits Congress enacted the law to stop, simply by codifying general nuisance or negligence principles into a statute aimed at the firearms industry. The petition argues that the Second Circuit green-lit exactly that move, creating a circuit split and opening the door for states to nullify federal law through hostile legislation and coordinated litigation.
Gun rights groups’ brief provides historical context. It argues that suppressing the lawful trade in arms has always been one of the most effective ways to disarm a free people.
As the brief puts it, ‘Suppressing commerce in arms has long been a means of disarming Americans.’
That theme runs through the filing from beginning to end. The amici trace how British authorities, before the American Revolution, sought to control the colonists not merely by force of arms, but by restricting gunpowder, arms imports, and domestic arms commerce.
In the brief’s telling, the Founding generation understood exactly what those restrictions meant: if government can cut off the supply of arms, it can reduce the people to dependence and submission.
That is why the filing spends so much time on the 1770s. It recounts General Thomas Gage’s restrictions on powder in Massachusetts, the seizure of powder stores, the British embargo on importing arms and ammunition into America, and colonial writings that openly described those measures as efforts to disarm and enslave the people.
One of the brief’s most powerful historical passages cites South Carolina patriots declaring that the British prohibition on arms exports ‘too clearly appears a design of disarming the people of America, in order the more speedily to dragoon and enslave them.’ The brief goes on to argue that Americans did not treat those policies as technical regulatory disputes. They answered them by seizing powder, smuggling arms, ramping up domestic manufacture, and ultimately fighting.
In one blunt line, the brief states, ‘At the Lexington Green and the Concord Bridge, the British demonstrated that they were willing to kill Americans to take their arms. Coercive disarmament initiated the war.’
…”
ht* tps://www.ammoland.com/2026/03/supreme-court-new-york-lawfare-end-run-plcaa/
Don’t Texans hang swamp creatures
Anti-Federalist No. 4: The 1788 Warning That Explains Everything Happening Today.
“In this video, we break down Anti-Federalist No. 4 and explain why its warning about fear, war, and centralized power still matters today. This Founding-era essay challenged the idea that Americans should surrender liberty because of threats of foreign wars, civil unrest, and frontier conflict. We also connect its arguments directly to the Second Amendment, the Bill of Rights, and the Founders’ deep suspicion of concentrated government power.”
ht* tps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-YLBVP2w9rE
David Daleiden’s expose revealing Planned Parenthood sold aborted baby parts fully validated as final charges dismissed
”
…
The final criminal charge against pro-life activist David Daleiden has been dismissed and his case expunged, concluding a prosecution that began after he released undercover videos exposing Planned Parenthood and the abortion industry selling the body parts of aborted babies.
…
Charlie Kirk
@charliekirk11
Nine years ago, David Daleiden helped expose the trafficking in baby parts by employees at Planned Parenthood. The story was suppressed, and the videos removed from the Internet, thanks to legal action by Kamala Harris.
She should have to explain why covering up baby parts trafficking was so important to her.
…
‘After enduring 9 years of weaponized political prosecution, putting an end to the lawfare launched by Kamala Harris is a huge victory for my investigative reporting and for the public’s right to know the truth about Planned Parenthood’s sale of aborted baby body parts. Now we all must get to work to protect families and infants from the criminal abortion-industrial complex,’ he said.
…”
ht* tps://thepostmillennial.com/david-daleidens-expose-revealing-planned-parenthood-sold-aborted-baby-parts-fully-validated-as-final-charges-dismissed?utm_campaign=64470
All firearms or only some? Handguns? Rifles? Shotguns? All transfers? Sales? Gifts? Bequests? So many questions!
Pistols for NY. Need a permit to even touch one in that state.
The evil left will NEVER stop trying to disarm honest Americans, especially Christian Americans.
Lets add an Admendment that bans Democrats from adding Amendments to Bills