The Newsom/Mamdani Left Won’t Like What Charlie Kirk’s Murder Does to America

Colin Wright politics political chart meme
(Image: Colin Wright)

The death of Charlie Kirk and the reaction to it have shaken millions of Americans, at least those who have managed to hold on to their humanity in the past ten years.

Even if the prominent Democrats in the party tried to project a uniform message of decency, to condemn the violence and offer condolences to the family, it was increasingly evident that they were no longer in control of their own party. Not even President Barack Obama himself could set the tone for these people, so consumed with hatred are they.

Maybe they thought selling fear for ten years and calling Trump and his supporters an existential threat was a good idea because it would motivate their voters to the polls. Instead, they’ve created a Frankenstein monster that is now roaming the quiet countryside and scaring the crap out of normal Americans.

They want all of us in this country to join them, to agree that Charlie Kirk got what he deserved. He supports gun rights, after all. That alone meant they would shed no tears for him, his wife, or his kids. 

— Sasha Stone in The Left Red-Pills America…

Leave a Reply to Bucephalus Cancel Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

40 thoughts on “The Newsom/Mamdani Left Won’t Like What Charlie Kirk’s Murder Does to America”

    1. additional for above: Robinson resides in Southern Utah and confessed to his father. Two law enforcement sources say Robinson’s father reported his son to clergy, who took the tip to the U.S. Marshals Service. Robinson was taken into custody late Thursday night, FBI Director Kash Patel said today (Friday, 12 Sept 2025).

      1. Its a little confusing on this point of how he/she got turned and arrested because some news sources are reporting slightly different sequences of events.

        here is what happened:

        Trump said a ‘minister’ and the father played key roles in persuading him to surrender.

        The minister called the tip line and this alerted them, and the father drove the killer to police HQ where they were waiting for him.

        1. More left wing and trans-influence violence:

          Some of you may have missed it because it was overshadowed by the death of Charlie Kirk, but the same day, a few hours before Charlie Kirk was murdered there was a school shooting at Evergreen High School (a rural school about 30 miles west of Denver) in Colorado. The shooter was Desmond Holly, a 16 year old student, used a revolver and injured two and then killed himself. According to investigators he carried a significant amount of ammunition and reloaded several times before eventually turning the gun on himself. He had time, with a six shot revolver, to reload several times and fire and injure two and kill himself before police arrived – six shot revolver and reloading and firing all six several times is about 42 rounds fired maybe +/- a few rounds.

          He was radicalized by a left wing radical network and his father (a biological male, original name Morgan Holly) who is a male-to-female trans who went by the name ‘Winter’ (as ‘Winter Holly’) and used pronouns ‘she/her’ and is an avowed Trump hater. The social media of Desmond has been deleted but some of it was captured before it was removed, he expressed a lot of antisemitic hate and left wing extremist ideology. Some sources say that Desmond was a ‘white supremacist’ but most ‘white supremacist’ today are far left wing radical extremist so that’s not saying anything different. As for the ‘gender identity’ of Desmond, not known at this time.

  1. It should’ve been an obvious death knell when the majority on the left started embracing men beating on women, surgically mutilating children and given them experimental drugs for unverified off-label uses.
    But hey, I’m biased because I’m not infected with terminal tolerance, toxic empathy or TDS.

    1. They promoted all of those things in the name of love and acceptance. All modern Democrats are lost in one way or another.

      Regarding the article, Obama wasn’t trying to turn anything around. He was only trying to stop them from acting too crazy so they could win. Obama put America on this hateful, dividing path. This is exactly what they want. Notice the first thing Obama said after the assassination was that we don’t know the motive. Isn’t it funny how there’s no questioning the supposed motive when a black lifelong criminal dies from a drug OD while resisting arrest?

    2. One would think putting tens of thousands of Americans in concentration camps and having the solicitor general proven in court to have used forged evidence to do it would be a death knell for a political party, yet here we are 83.5 years latter…

      1. Nanny, I’m assuming you were speaking of FDR, but unfortunately FDR never ordered the Japanese American citizens and turned in camps.

        So you need to offer some proof of your claim.

        I can tell you FDR never issued any executive orders that directed the incarceration of Japanese American citizens.

        1. “Nanny, I’m assuming you were speaking of FDR, but unfortunately FDR never ordered the Japanese American citizens and turned in camps.

          I can tell you FDR never issued any executive orders that directed the incarceration of Japanese American citizens.””

          False by being disingenuous and deceptive. Typical Miner49er.

          On Feb. 19, 1942, Pres. Franklin D. Roosevelt signed Executive Order 9066, granting Secretary of War Henry Lewis Stimson and his commanders the power “to prescribe military areas in such places and of such extent as he or the appropriate Military Commander may determine, from which any or all persons may be excluded.” While the order named no specific group or location, nearly all Japanese American citizens on the West Coast were soon forced to uproot themselves and their families for relocation to internment camps.

          The purpose was to exclude Japanese American from living in American cities on the west coast as they were considered ‘hostile enemy’. They had to be put somewhere, thus interment camps. This was the intent, but unstated, purpose of the order.

          From 1942 to 1945, roughly 120,000 U.S. citizens of Japanese heritage were incarcerated at 1 of 10 camps located in California, Arizona, Wyoming, Colorado, Utah, and Arkansas. Living conditions were bare bones, with uninsulated barracks heated by coal-burning stoves, common latrines, little hot running water, and food being rationed. Although Japanese Americans attempted to create a semblance of community by setting up schools, sports, and other activities, they did so under the constant watch of armed guards with orders to shoot anyone who tried to leave.

          FDR did nothing to change that.

          yes, FDR did issue an executive order that directed the incarceration of Japanese American citizens – he did it by simply wording it broadly and without specifying and doing nothing about it when it happened, it was his intent with the order so in effect and purpose and intent and meaning and actions did in fact issue an executive order that ordered the internment of Japanese Americans. A fact bought out and substantiated by Congress in 1988 when it formally apologized to Japanese Americans for what happened, and the Civil Liberties Act awarded $20,000 each to some 80,000 surviving internees and their families.

        2. Whether he ordered it or not. It happened on his watch. He was commander in chief. He could have easily stopped it or corrected the injustice.

          But injustice is what the fascist left is about. You guys own slavery. You even fought a war to keep it. You started the klan and you actively resisted the civil rights movement.

          You said it yourself, miner. The .gov can limit rights. And you guys have a history of limiting rights.

          1. Miner49er is a radical left wing extremist, of course hes going to come back in here and troll with his re-write of democrat history.

            FDR did in fact issue an executive order for just that purpose, he didn’t need to specifically say it in the order. The broad latitude of the statement in the order “to prescribe military areas in such places and of such extent as he or the appropriate Military Commander may determine, from which any or all persons may be excluded.” was in response to the idea of Japan attacking the west coast cities in California, and in fact Japan did do so. Japan attacked the United States west coast during World War II, with the Bombardment of Ellwood on February 23, 1942 when a Japanese submarine shelled coastal targets near Santa Barbara, California. This marked the first naval bombardment of the U.S. mainland since the War of 1812.

            There had already been intel that an attack was going to happen, and japans subs had been spotted before off the coast and there was a possibility of invasion that was to be detered. FDR and the generals were worried that among our population on the west coast that some Japanese American citizens could have been spying for Japan and giving them details as to disposition of forces along the west coast area of California or would rise up and attack U.S. forces to aid an invasion by Japans forces. To purge this from the population the generals suggested removing Japanese American citizens from the west coast and placing them in camps as if prisoners of war without calling it that. Thus the executive order from FDR for that purpose, it was all arranged with the generals that this is what it meant.

            FDR knew exactly what was happening, he carefully crafted an order to do it and did nothing to stop it after it went into effect. He literally, on Feb. 19, 1942, issued Executive Order 9066 for just that purpose without saying it in the order.

  2. Charlie Kirk on mass shooting victims:

    “We cannot allow them to emotionally hijack the narrative”

    “I think it’s worth to have a cost of, unfortunately, some gun deaths every single year so that we can have the Second Amendment to protect our other God-given rights.”

    “Now you might say, oh Charlie, I don’t want to live in that kind of militarized society,” he opined. “I’m afraid we’re already heading towards that, and I would rather have citizens have that ability where it’s decentralized than just the government have that ability where it’s centralized.”

    “Therefore, you have to be real,” he argued. “And, of course, our hearts go out to the victims in Kentucky for every one of these situations. But we cannot allow them to emotionally hijack the narrative.”

    https://rumble.com/v2heqnk-charlie-kirk-reacts-to-louisville-mass-shooting.html

    1. The very definition of fascism is to murder a person you do not agree with. The murderer of Kirk and his supporters, which includes you, miner, are fascists.

      You and your fascist buddies own this murder miner. You’re too cowardly to take up the gun yourself but you use what influence you have to goad overly gullible young people into destroying themselves and your enemies.

      Justice is long overdue.

    2. FormerParatrooper

      In a perfect world, the assassin would have kept in trade school and eventually become an electrician. We don’t have a perfect world.

      The ramblings of your type on DU and other similar sites are concerning to people who are more moderate that extreme left or right. We don’t like either extremes.

      Your MA Duece comment early epitomizes your own moral failing.

      I had some respect for you in the past, but the last few years you are showing your true self. I don’t want to live under your type of fascism any more than what I see only the polar extreme. Neither version of it is palpable. Neither is good for a free people.

      1. Void,

        He was targeted because he was EFFECTIVE. TP USA is one of the largest, fastest-growing groups in the US for high school and college age students. Of course MajorSkidmark thinks Kirk “deserved” his assassination, because the skidmark disagreed with his opinion, and Leftist/fascists, like skidmark can’t tolerate opinions different from theirs. The really ironic think, to me, is that TP USA has more than doubled the number of national chapters since Kirk’s cold-blooded murder. Likewise, there are literally thousands of posts and videos online of former Dimocrats reacting to the revolting spectacle of Leftist/fascists online celebrating Kirk’s assassination. Heh. Heh, heh, heh! Leftist/fascist fools have no idea what they’ve unleashed by their murderous hate speech AND action. Having really leaned into the FA, methinks they are about to experience some major FO.

        1. Basically covered what I meant. The next few popular influence personalities in that age group are less friendly towards lefties . Unless of course they just wanted blood and destabilization in which case yes this could set up a lot of the violence they thought they were suffering.

  3. After Charlie Kirk was murdered I find it telling that not one city was burned, no cars were turned over, no riots, no stores were looted, and no one else was harmed in any way. Instead, there were vigils and prayers.

    And yet the left calls conservatives extremists?

    1. FormerParatrooper

      What I did see was donations to Turning Point, a desire to keep his message into the future. No riots, no cities burnt, no chat zones, no mostly peaceful violence at all.

      I do believe we are crossing a line after this that I don’t like, I don’t want to be drug into, because there will be things lived that no one needs to experience.

    1. It is way past time to name the dems as a terrorist organization. Remove all dems from office. Take all their party assets and begin to weed them out of our schools and institutions.

      Anything les is failing our nation and children.

      1. They’ve been pushing the claim that the assassin is a conservative. Recall the claims that Trump’s two would-be assassins were also labeled as Republicans. They’ve gotten away with so many lies for so long that they think everyone is as gullible as Democratic voters. When people begin to notice the lies, they change the news cycle.

        1. There is ‘political orientation’ (i.e. what party people vote for or follow, how they registered to vote, conservative, moderate, republican, democrat etc…). Then there is ‘ideology’ that is polarized for the ‘political orientation’ or against the ‘political orientation’, in whole or part.

          This killer, Tyler Robinson, was ‘far left wing trans ANTIFA ideology’ in thoughts and for actions in his heinous deed, no matter his ‘political orientation’. He had expressed this to his own family members and to friends and on line, in regards to Charlie Kirk. His own father and other family members have pointed out and noticed how ‘left wing ideology politicized’ he had become. There are also indications from his captured social media before it was taken down he was, lets call it for sake of simplicity, ‘gender confused’ leaning towards ‘female’ and that he was ‘on line friends’ with known far left wing radicalized TRANTIFA trans people, one of which it seems he told of his plans to murder and this person alluded to it in a cryptic post on X the day before it happened (I posted this in the comments for another article).

          The left wing and left wing media has always been keen to point out or imply ‘political orientation’ as ‘conservative/republican’ of killers. But notice, when the ‘political orientation’ of the killer is democrat they don’t hype that up. Its one of their little tricks to keep things polarized.

          Anyone who murders or attempts to murder, or anyone who harms or seeks to harm physically or criminally, someone of their own ‘political orientation’ based upon ‘grievances’ against their own ‘political orientation’ ideology is expressing an opposite ideology either in whole or part. This is either left or right of center, and basically, center is the point where all come together and things are balanced and seek a common goal and ideology is all the same.

          ▶ Trump’s two would-be assassins were ‘far left wing ideology’ in thoughts for actions. (the diametrically opposed stance was far left wing ideology, one is dead but the other is a loon)

          ▶ All mass/school shooters were/are ‘far left wing ideology’ in thoughts for actions (yes, mentally ill, but the very liberal ‘grievances’ or ‘reasons’ enactment of oppression by killing is a far left wing ideology nature).

          ▶ All violent criminals are ‘far left wing ideology’ in thoughts for actions (the liberal nature of oppression by violence of another is a far left wing ideology) .

          ▶ Tyler Robinson, who assassinated (murdered) Charlie Kirk was ‘far left wing ideology’ in thoughts for actions.

          There are good and bad in every sector of society ‘demographic’, its just the way society is – some are good people and some are bad people – and every sector of society ‘demographic’ has disagreements with another sector of society ‘demographic’. But no matter the ‘political orientation’, the ‘ideology’ that one enacts in thoughts for action is what they are in thoughts for actions and deed in those actions.

          1. Former Friend of Kirk’s Killer Calls Him ‘Leftist’.

            “Tyler Robinson, allegedly the man who assassinated Turning Point USA founder Charlie Kirk at Utah Valley University (UVU) this week, came from a Republican family. But a high school friend insists that Tyler himself was increasingly far left in his politics.

            The youth who claimed to be Tyler‘s high school friend asked to remain anonymous when he agreed to a phone interview with The Guardian on Friday. The accused murderer, who killed Kirk with one shot to the neck while Kirk was answering a question about transgender mass shooters Wednesday, was ‘pretty left on everything,’ the friend affirmed.

            Some lefties now want to claim Tyler Robinson was pro-MAGA because of his family’s views. But the friend clarified Tyler was ‘the only member of his family that was really leftist.’ And the ‘rest of his family was very hard Republican.’
            …”

            https://pjmedia.com/catherinesalgado/2025/09/12/former-friend-of-kirks-killer-called-him-leftist-n4943647

        2. The left wingers are even faking information to claim this killer was ‘right wing MAGA’ or conservative or republican.

          For example:

          “An account with 5 million followers on X posts a fake photo of suspect Tyler Robinson wearing a Trump shirt and quietly follows up in a thread with the real photo.

          The fake photo (which hasn’t been deleted) gets 400k impressions in an hour, and the real one gets 50k.

          There appears to be a coordinated effort right now to spread as much fake information as possible to label the alleged Kirk assassin as a far-right Trump supporter.”

          [pics in link]

          https://x.com/CollinRugg/status/1966575444435890341

          [Tyler Robinson was not right wing conservative or a republican or MAGA. His family was republican, but Tyler Robinson was far left wing and his own social media showed that and his friends past and present, his room mate, even his own family say that. See, this is something a lot of left wing wants so desperately to be true – that this killer was right wing in some way – they want it to be true so they can claim some sort of ‘moral high ground’ for their empty pathetic lives and they are willing to lie and imply falsely to promote that idea.]

          1. The left wingers have even faked ‘donation records’ to make it look like this Killer donated to Trump thus was republican, but that’s been exposed as faked as well.

            for example > https://x.com/JulieCar94/status/1966580479357776246

            [note: This ‘Evelyn’ person, this is not the first time she has been caught faking such information and posting it.]

        3. Dem Senator totally melts down after Charlie Kirk’s killer is exposed as a leftist…

          “It’s over. Tyler Robinson, the suspect accused of assassinating Charlie Kirk, is a leftist. It’s a fact. His family might be Republican, but he’s not—and that shouldn’t be a shocking development. Many households have differing political views. Are Democrats blind to this? It’s why so many liberals opted to cease all contact with their Trump-supporting relatives. Only the dense, the stupid, and the sheltered feel otherwise; those people are liberals.

          All day, we’ve been subjected to gaslighting of the worst sort, even clowns falling for atrocious photoshops to make it seem like Robinson was a Trump supporter. On its face, it never made sense: he was such a Kirk supporter that he killed him. That’s what the Left ran with and were rightly laughed out of the room. On the Hill, Democrats have offered word salads over the charged rhetoric from their side that’s led to violence. Nancy Pelosi fumbled the ball.

          🚨 JUST IN: Nancy Pelosi says Democrats can’t take ‘responsibility’ for their rhetoric against conservatives, because it wasn’t their ‘intention’ for violence to ensue.

          ‘We can’t take responsibility for the minds that are out there and how they hear it.’

          And now Sen. Brian Schatz (D-HI) said that it doesn’t matter if the shooter was a leftist. It very much does, Brian. You people don’t get to dictate the rules here. Liars aren’t afforded that privilege, and the American people see right through the Democrats’ games.

          BREAKING: A friend of Tyler Robinson, the 22-year-old accused of killing Charlie Kirk, confirms to The Guardian that he was a ‘leftist’

          The friend says he was left-wing on all issues and he became extreme on politics

          He was the only left-winger in the family
          …”

          https://townhall.com/tipsheet/mattvespa/2025/09/12/dem-senator-totally-melts-down-after-suspect-in-charlie-kirks-assassination-is-exposed-as-a-leftist-n2663272

        4. Tyler Robinson was definitely not ‘republican’ or MAGA or ‘conservative’ or ‘right wing’. He was solid left wing, the only left wing member of his family, he was far left wing, ‘far left wing trans ANTIFA ideology’ – he even said as much in his own words in his own social media posts.

          Now the left wing media is trying to float the idea that the inscriptions on the gun/ammo were an attempt by him to implicate a left wing killer and that Tyler was really right wing. Its a lie.

          The left wing is sooo desperate for wanting to make this look like their imaginary boogeyman MAGA did it – they are trying all sorts of tricks from creating conspiracy theories to faking pics to faking donation records to out right lying to simply screaming it out hoping it will take hold.

          And the left wingers and their democrat politicians are sooo desperate to distance them selves from the more recent Charlotte killer and the Minnesota killer trans and the Nashville trans killer and the ANTIFA anti-ice violence and the TRANTIFA mass-shooting attacks on ICE facility and border patrol and police officers and the recent far left-winger school shooting in Colorado (on the same day Charlie Kirk was murdered by left winger Tyler Robinson) and now the Charlie Kirk murder. All this, and a thousand more events, past and present, was all inspired, motivated, facilitated, aided (and even participated in) by the left wingers and their democrat politicians via their hatred of the country and law and constitution and and blatant ‘ideology and gender identity’ attacks on our counties children and people and their rhetoric and their ‘polices’ and their attacks on constitutional rights and their outright (even from the floor of congress and in public speeches) calls for violence against ‘conservatives’ and ‘MAGA’ and ‘republicans’ the President and ‘right wing’. So its not a mystery as to why they are lying about try to lie and obfuscate and distract and deflect from Tyler Robinson.

          1. Democrats and their propaganda news media lie about everything. They look extremely desperate to anyone halfway paying attention.

            I come from a family of hardcore Democrats. That doesn’t mean I’m one.

  4. He May Have Pulled The Trigger, But Charlie Kirk’s Killer Didn’t ‘Act Alone’. (The ‘radicalized’ assassin did not get to this moment on his own. Investigation details show a young man steeped in leftist dogma.)



    As The Blaze’s Auron Macintyre put it, the shooter appears to have been ‘radicalized by a leftist terrorist network, and it seems like he may have also coordinated with them for the attack.’

    Even if the alleged assassin ‘acted alone,’ he surely did not get to this moment on his own. We know so far from the early details of the investigation that the suspect appears steeped in Marxist Antifa-style indoctrination.

    ‘We’ve seen a lot of weakness and impotence on the right, so Republican leaders need to not just stand up there and say, ‘Oh, we must condemn—both sides do these things,’ Hemingway told Fox Business Network’s Stuart Varney this week. ‘They need to actually take the threat from left-wing activists very seriously. They need to investigate how they’re funded—Antifa, other terrorist groups. They’re going to war against ICE. You know, they tried to kill Donald Trump. They’ve successfully killed Charlie Kirk.’

    President Trump earlier this week said his administration planned to investigate funding sources of violent far-left campaigns, noting leftist billionaire George Soros and his ‘nonprofits.’

    ‘We’re going to look into Soros because I think it’s a RICO [racketeering] case against him and other people, because this is more than protests. This is real agitation. This is riots on the street — and we’re going to look into that,’ Trump told Fox News.
    …”

    https://thefederalist.com/2025/09/12/he-may-have-pulled-the-trigger-but-charlie-kirks-suspected-killer-didnt-act-alone/

  5. Charlie Kirk’s Widow Addresses the Nation.



    And then she spoke defiantly and with determination to those who have Charlie’s blood on their hands. “The evildoers responsible for my husband’s assassination have no idea what they have done,” she said, adding, “They killed Charlie because he preached a message of patriotism, faith, and of God’s merciful love.”

    Erika followed that with a warning:

    They should all know this: If you thought that my husband’s mission was powerful before, you have no idea. You have no idea what you just have unleashed across this entire country and this world. You have no idea. You have no idea the fire that you have ignited within this wife. To everyone listening tonight across America, the movement my husband built will not die. It won’t. I refuse to let that happen. It will not die. All of us will refuse to let that happen. No one will ever forget my husband’s name, and I will make sure of it. It will become stronger, bolder, louder, and greater than ever.

    You can watch Erika’s entire speech here. Warning: You will need some tissues.
    …”

    https://pjmedia.com/sarah-anderson/2025/09/12/breaking-charlie-kirks-widow-speaks-to-the-nation-n4943653

  6. Charlie Kirk assassin, Tyler Robinson, lived with transgender partner.

    “In a disturbing development following the assassination of Turning Point USA founder Charlie Kirk, sources now reveal that alleged shooter Tyler Robinson was living with a transgender partner at the time of the attack. According to individuals familiar with the investigation, the partner — a biological male transitioning to female — has been cooperating fully with federal authorities.

    While details of the investigation have been sparse, this latest information raises further questions about the political and social environment that may have influenced the 22-year-old alleged shooter. Charlie Kirk, a prominent conservative and outspoken critic of gender ideology, has been a frequent target of left-wing activists and mainstream media hostility. The fact that the alleged killer was in a domestic relationship that directly intersects with one of today’s most hotly contested cultural issues — transgender identity — cannot be ignored.

    Utah Gov. Spencer Cox confirmed to The Wall Street Journal that the suspect in Charlie Kirk’s assassination was heavily influenced by far-left ideology, stating, ‘It’s very clear to us and to the investigators that this was a person who was deeply indoctrinated with leftist ideology.’
    …”

    https://townhall.com/tipsheet/saraharnold/2025/09/13/charlie-kirk-assassin-lived-with-transgender-partner-n2663296

Scroll to Top