For decades, the right was caricatured as paranoid doomsday preppers. Now it’s the left that’s preparing for the apocalypse. Once, revolution was an aesthetic — Che Guevara shirts and campus protests. Now it’s a lifestyle brand with tactical vests.
Meanwhile, conservatives — those caricatured as the violent barbarians — are mostly watching this unfold with disbelief. They’ve always known that guns aren’t inherently evil; intent is. What terrifies them isn’t the weaponry but the warped conviction behind it. A man protecting his family is predictable; a lunatic avenging an ideology is not.
We are entering uncharted territory. The United States has seen political assassinations, riots, and radical groups before — but never with this cultural reach. The internet ensures that every grievance finds both a trigger and a target. Fury is now networked, outrage algorithmic. And unlike the extremists of old, today’s radicals don’t hide in compounds. They scroll beside you, shop beside you, share your workspace, and sleep next door.
You can’t mix apocalyptic language with live ammunition and expect harmony. A society can survive hypocrisy. It cannot survive hysteria with high-capacity magazines. Every revolution begins with the belief that violence will heal what politics can’t. It never does. It only creates new tyrants with a taste for blood.
Perhaps, in some dark corner of their minds, the new progressives believe they’re the heroes in history’s next great moral war. They forget that history has a habit of eating its heroes. It also has an excellent memory. It remembers every bullet, every boast, every cause that mistook fury for faith. And it will remember who called it justice when they started killing the innocent.
— John Mac Ghlionn in The Armed Awakening of America’s Radical Left
Don’t trust the liberal gun owners. Never ever trust them. They are responsible for passing and keeping gun control laws on the books.
They are responsible for the most racist modern day gun control law, still being the law of the land in California.
The Mulford Act. Which was co-written by a polish J3:wish immigrant lawyer. And member of the ACLU board of directors.
And members of the John Brown gun club were recently arrested attacking Ice agents.
It’s very interesting how the news media is not talking about that.
I posted news articles about it previously.
“Don’t trust the liberal gun owners.
They are responsible for the most racist modern day gun control law, still being the law of the land in California.
The Mulford Act. Which was co-written by a polish J3:wish immigrant“
Ronald Reagan was a liberal?
The Mulford Act was a 1967 California bill that prohibited public carrying of loaded firearms without a permit.
Named after Republican assemblyman Don Mulford and signed into law by governor of California Ronald Reagan.
Oh I see, you are blaming this on the liberals, because you want to conceal the Republicans’ long history of involvement in gun control.
You obviously have never researched the Mulford Act. And you have no knowledge of the california legislative law creation process.
You should spend your own time and learn about it.
How is he wrong? Because you say so?
@Missy12 (AKA Miner49er)
Miner49er is wrong because he is wrong because he has not done the research and paints it deceptively ignoring context. When you post ‘confirmation bias’, especially in a subject you do not understand, in a reply that cherry picks what another poster said, you are always wrong if trying to post to support your own trolling effort like Miner49er has done here.
He is also wrong because he needs to be defended by his other account name called ‘Missy12’ so we know its a troll.
“Meanwhile, conservatives — those caricatured as the violent barbarians — are mostly watching this unfold with disbelief.”
Not really disbelief per se’ but rather more with waiting. Waiting for what, you might ask. Waiting for their massive mistakes to become obvious to them…. never interrupt your enemy when they are making a mistake.
The Ukraine army recently captured a Russian GRU (National Security Services, kinda like a combination of FBI and Secret Service) and interrogated him.
They asked him why they didn’t stop the head of Wagner (Yevgeny Prigozhin) when he marched on Moscow. His reply was interesting –
“When it’s 1,000 protesters, we crush them. When it’s 10,000 protesters, we watch them. When it’s 100,000, we join them.
I’m cautious, but not really worried by those losers. They don’t have anywhere near the numbers to carry out their little ‘Revolution’ that they think, while we have several hundred thousand of recent combat experience military-trained veterans who know something about small unit tactics and accurate shooting.
The best thing we can do is point and laugh hysterically at them, because they really *hate* being laughed at… 😉
The GRU is military intelligence, not national security.
Russian national security service is the FSB.
That error casts doubt on the veracity of the reporting.
It was GRU as I understood it.
I’m not Russian, but you are a fascist…
The FSB (Federal Security Service) is responsible for counterintelligence, internal security, counter-terrorism, and surveillance.
The SVR (Foreign Intelligence Service) Focuses on foreign intelligence gathering, espionage, and analysis.
The GRU (Main Intelligence Directorate) Primarily deals with military intelligence, special operations, and cyber warfare.
Although all three separately report to different levels in the government, the roles functionality of the FSB, SVR, and GRU are actually ‘intertwined’ where one functions as the other or as part of the others with state policy and national security strategy. In effect, in state policy and national security strategy, its one big ‘thing’ instead of three different agencies.
This is worse now because of the epidemic of single and childless young Americans. Getting married tames young men, and having children tames young women. You aren’t as interested in the revolution when you have a child to feed at home. You have more to lose after you’ve started a family, so you tend to take fewer risks. This will keep getting worse until we change the toxic culture from the secksual* and feminist revolution of the 60s.
Dude,
As a (happy and proud) father of four, I will respectfully disagree, on this one aspect. The mother of my four children was a . . .. let’s call it ‘reluctant’ mother. And, yet, when we had our first, I literally watched her face transform when they handed her our first son. And from there on, SHE was the one lobbying for more kids. And, did it improve us, both? I think it did.
But, as a parent, if someone genuinely doesn’t WANT kids? Then they shouldn’t have them. Being a parent is too much of a responsibility if you don’t want the job. I’d love to see more young Americans embrace the ‘parent lifestyle’, and I do think it would help ‘civilize’ the ones who did. But I’m more concerned about the babies abandoned to parents who don’t want children.
When it comes to parenting, I have but two rules:
1. If you don’t want ’em? Don’t have ’em.
2. If you can’t feed ’em, don’t breed ’em.
A few days ago, I was slapped in the face, twice, because I bested a liberal woman in a conversation about freedom of speech. Her premise was that since conservatives disagreed with Democrats they lost their right to express an opinion. I. Kidd. You. Not!
I am afraid for my safety as a conservative, white, Christian, republican!
“I am afraid for my safety as a conservative, white, Christian“
What a snowflake, do you think you’re the first male who said some smart ass shit to a woman and got slapped?
Don’t be afraid little man, the big bad women folk aren’t going to hurt you.
What do you have to fear, you can just call on the Holy Spirit and in any case you’re promised eternal liife.
“What a snowflake, do you think you’re the first male who said some smart ass shit to a woman and got slapped?”
Once again Miner49er/Missy12 you must represented what was posted. He said this…
“few days ago, I was slapped in the face, twice, because I bested a liberal woman in a conversation about freedom of speech.”
Miner49er/Missy12, where did he say it was something he said that was “smart ass shit”.
See, this is your far left wing liberalism mental illness showing Miner49er/Missy12. Assuming he was in the wrong because he’s conservative white Christian. That is one of the defining traits of the far left wing, assuming everyone else is wrong and self-justifying it like, for example, you did Miner49er/Missy12 and its a mental illness mindset trait dealing with confirmation bias.
Correction for: ‘…you must represented…’
Should have been…
…you mis-represented…
“I am afraid for my safety as a conservative, white, Christian“
And justifiably too. The liberal far left wing has plainly stated their goal, that they want conservative white Christians dead and even democrat congress members are saying it indirectly.
“A few days ago, I was slapped in the face, twice, because I bested a liberal woman in a conversation about freedom of speech. Her premise was that since conservatives disagreed with Democrats they lost their right to express an opinion. I. Kidd. You. Not!”
So this violent left wing liberal woman physically assaulted you – yep, more left wing violence and a crime – these people are inherently violent and criminal. What would she have done or wanted to do if she had some sort of weapon? Oh wait, don’t need an answer for that because thousands of far left wing liberals have already told us on social media what they would do or want to do if they had a weapon and one of them demonstrated it by murdering Charlie Kirk.
But Miner49er/Missy12 blames it all on you with “What a snowflake, do you think you’re the first male who said some smart ass shit to a woman and got slapped?”
And not only that but then Miner49er/Missy12 demonstrates abundant ignorance on Christianity with this ignorant comment “What do you have to fear, you can just call on the Holy Spirit and in any case you’re promised eternal liife.”
David,
Like I suspect you were, I was raised to NEVER hit a woman. I think that’s a good rule, and should be followed. But, then, we’re living in the age of the “Rules for Radicals”, and Leftist/fascist violence is a daily occurrence.
If a Leftist/fascist ‘female’ feels that engaging me, physically, is her right? Then punching her frickin’ lights out is mine. Attack me, and I WILL respond with force. Sounds like his only action was to say things this Leftist/fascist didn’t want to hear. She could have ignored it, or walked away, or tried to refute it, instead she chose to resort to physical violence. She chose the method of interaction, and if he’d clocked her good and hard, maybe she’d be less of a violent barbarian the next time she encountered someone with whom she disagreed.
Dear Left.
Bring it.
So, there are no armed, violent right wingers?
Arming for intentional and malicious murder and mayhem is a uniquely left wing ideology because of the liberal nature of assuming its ok because ‘you say so’ which is uniquely left wing liberal.
Political orientation and ideological orientation are two different things. Sometimes they merge and sometimes they do not. You routinely confuse the two Miner49er (Aka Missy12).
There are or have been ‘intentional murder’ violent armed ‘right wingers’ if you look at voting orientation, but if you look at it overall you find a unique leaning towards left wing ideology but no where near the numbers in the mentally ill left wing, and even then these ‘right wing’ ‘intentinal murder’ violent people would be expressing a unique left wing ideology in enacting such violence.
Correction for: “Arming for intentional and malicious murder and mayhem is a uniquely left wing ideology because of the liberal nature of assuming its ok because ‘you say so’ which is uniquely left wing liberal.”
Should have been…
Arming for intentional and malicious murder and mayhem is a uniquely left wing ideology because of the liberal nature of assuming such violence is ok because ‘you say so’ and then self-justifying it which is uniquely left wing liberal ideology.
Missy,
Gonna be a lot more, y’all Leftist/fascists keep effin’ around. FAFO, baby, FAFO.
Tiananmen Scare: Violent Left wing ‘Swagged Out’ Maoist Edgelord Trembles Like [a little] B1tch When ChiCom Thugs Plunder His Memes.
“Hasan Piker, left-wing streamer best known for hating dogs and America, beguiles regime authorities by simping for China.
…
Hasan Piker, the dog-abusing left-wing edgelord who identifies as a ‘swagged out white boy,’ cowered pathetically on Tuesday when Chinese authorities disrupted his pilgrimage to the communist backwater. Livestream viewers gawked as Piker’s giddy persona gave way to trembling panic as regime security officers approached his entourage near Tiananmen Square, the site of the notorious massacre. Mercifully for Piker, the livestream was swiftly terminated; loyal fans were unable to witness his inevitable groveling in the face of authority.
Moments before the embarrassing confrontation with communist authorities, Piker was seen goofing around with Will Neff, a banking scion turned anti-capitalist influencer. Neff, who captained the squash team at the prestigious Blair Academy (annual tuition: $78,980), was holding up his phone to show off an epic AI-created meme of Piker’s face on the body of Mao Zedong. This caught the attention of the ChiCom thugs, who rushed over to investigate. Neff quivered in fear and attempted to hide his phone. The broadcast abruptly cut off after an officer demanded to see the footage.
…”
The livestream resumed after Piker was able to settle his nerves and revive his smirking frat boy affectation. ‘This is awesome,’ he squealed while fidgeting with his yellow Adidas track jacket. ‘They’ve never seen a swagged out white boy like me before.’ Indeed, the regime authorities were understandably confounded to discover a group of dim-witted Americans openly professing their love for Chairman Mao and his exterminatory social policies. Most normal Americans are less inclined to glorify China, a country that treats dogs almost as poorly as Piker treats his own.
‘Like, like, I just don’t, like, I, I’m not—I don’t have any sort of patriotism in my heart … for America,’ Piker eloquently declared before watching the ceremonial flag-raising at sunrise near Mao’s portrait at the Tiananmen gate. He marveled at the ‘pride’ of the older Chinese subjects who were fortunate enough to experience a ‘radical transformation in their lifetimes unlike any other country.’ Piker was likely referring to Mao’s left-wing policies that resulted in tens of millions of deaths.
…
In addition to loving Red China and its authoritarian speech police, Piker is also a toxic anti-Semite who has argued landlords should be mass-slaughtered until ‘the streets soak in their red, capitalist blood.’ Although he claimed that the United States ‘deserved’ to be attacked on 9/11—and made many other heinous remarks—Piker has been openly embraced by the Pod Save America bros and other mainstream elements of the Democratic Party.
[note: and now ya know why the far left wing is arming up and democrat congress members and democrat politicians hate you – they want a ‘radical transformation in their lifetimes unlike any other country’ by murdering millions of conservatives and their children to bring Mao’s left-wing policies to America.]
https://freebeacon.com/politics/tiananmen-scare-swagged-out-maoist-edgelord-trembles-like-bitch-when-chicom-thugs-plunder-his-memes/