The fight over whether the Second Amendment is absolute or can be restricted makes for good legal debate in the courts, a good fundraising issue and good television, but it is beside the point. The cost of confiscating guns is simply prohibitive. Government, the courts and law enforcement would be overwhelmed; compliance could not be verified; and new guns would keep coming in or being made.
Meanwhile, an armed population provides deterrence at home and abroad that no one can fully measure and no one should casually discard. Whatever you think of the Second Amendment, arithmetic and physics have already settled the question of confiscation. The debate should move on to what can actually be done, such as encouraging gun safety training. But that is a debate for another day.
— Eric A. de Moya in Confiscation is impossible: Why the entire gun control debate misses the point
The same people that pushed for this so they could metaphorically dance in the blood of innocents to raise money to give them more power.
But as these anti-gun orgs have shown us with their words and actions they do not really care about lives saved for if they did they would be acknowledging the thousands of lives saved every year by DGU and by hero’s such as this man that saved lives by DGU. What the anti-gun orgs care about is their agenda and the money that comes from pushing it and the power they hope to gain from it which is why they do not acknowledge the lives saved by DGU and the good-guy-with-a-gun heroes and instead metaphorically ‘dance in the blood of the innocent’ for the emotional heart strings plucking as lives saved by DGU is contrary to their false narrative that good-guys-with-guns-do-not-exist-and-are-a-myth and acknowledging it would kill their false narrative and set up an opposing counter point that would kill their agenda.
The anti-gun orgs and politicians literally and intentionally and ignorantly created the conditions under which a school-shooter can succeed – they rang the dinner bell with their agenda and the predator monsters showed up to eat and now they complain about what happened when its their fault to begin with because they created the conditions for the monsters to succeed and the monsters know it which is why they are attracted to ‘gun free zones’. Even nature and history in the animal kingdom shows us what happens to defenseless prey. But these same stupid and cruel anti-gun orgs and politicians will not acknowledge the reality that good-guys-with-guns will stop their monsters because if they did acknowledge it then their whole agenda goes down the tubes and they loose the money and power they crave.
The same people that pushed for this ‘gun free zone’ concept, well lets look at what gun free zones actually are … gun free zones, defined:
“gun (gŭn) free (frē) zone (zōn)
* Trap in which people congregate and are falsely promised safety by a make believe force field of a ‘No Guns” prohibition.
* A place where people are disarmed and not permitted life saving self-defense with firearms.
* Hunting grounds for violent predator criminals and mentally ill killers and mentally ill Trans killers and pedophiles and rapist, where defenseless prey is guaranteed by law.
* Place where existing laws against violent crimes do not work to prevent violent crimes the laws are touted to be able to prevent.
* Places designed to attract violent mentally ill predators.
* Places where police forces cease to operate to protect before the fact of a violent crime as they are touted to be able to do by politicians implying.
* Places Democrat politicians and anti-gun organizations use to attract violent mentally ill people to prey on and harm and kill your defenseless children.
Shame on Mark Kelly and wife Gabby Giffords, and all the anti-gun orgs and politicians and people, for trying to exploit the lives injured and lost in this horrible monstrous event by a mentally ill monster – exploiting it with posts when they are some of the ones that created the very condition that attracted this monster, a gun free zone, and now you metaphorically are ‘dancing in the blood of the innocent’ trying to tug at heart strings when you created the monsters condition for success by creating defenseless prey – you left these kids and school staff defenseless by your ignorant cruel intention of a ‘gun free zone’. It is only by chance or divine providence that a brave man with a gun happened to be driving by and was ultimately able to save lives by definitively stopping the monster. If you want to be angry about something look in the mirror and ask yourself “Why did I do something that left these children defenseless?” – shame on you, all of you anti-gun orgs and politicians and people.
Armed Citizen Stopping School Shooter Exposes Prohibitionist Hypocrisy.
ht* tps://www.ammoland.com/2026/10/oregon-armed-citizen-gun-control-hypocrisy/
wanna regulate something?….regulate the sale of body armor to the public