ATF Backs Down, Won’t Appeal Decision That Franklin Armory Reformation is a Standard, Non-NFA Firearm

Franklin Armory Reformation

Franklin Armory introduced the Reformation back in 2018. It’s a non-rifled (it actually has straight lands and grooves), non-shotgun, short-barreled firearm that’s kinda neither here nor there. In fact, it was designed to neatly fit between the definitions written into the NFA and the Gun Control Act, allowing it to be chambered in rifle calibers (either 5.56 or 300 Blackout) with a short barrel and a real stock…all while avoiding NFA regulation.

To no one’s surprise, the great regulatory minds at ATF bristled at this unbridled expression of ingenuity and the company’s careful reading of the laws. In 2019, the waived their regulatory wands and magically declared the Reformation to be a short-barrel shotgun. The same applied to the Franklin Antithesis which was introduced later and chambered for .45 Colt and .410 shells. The company sued along with the Firearms Regulatory Accountability Coalition.

In February, a District Court judge ruled that — go figure — words actually mean things. As Judge Daniel M. Traynor wrote in his ruling . . .

Franklin Armory presented a square peg, and ATF shoved it into a round hole. If Congress wanted “shotgun” to be a catch-all category for anything that doesn’t fit “rifle,” it could have done so. . . . . It is not for ATF to redefine the terms because it thinks Congress didn’t intend a certain outcome. Therefore, ATF exceeded its authority in defining “smoothbore” as anything lacking “functional rifling.”

He vacated the ATF’s ruling, but ATF appealed. Now, however, given the Trump administration’s dictum to reevaluate ATF’s positions on a host of moves it made during the Biden years, the agency has backed down and entered into an agreement with Franklin. They issued an open letter last week acknowledging that neither the Reformation nor the Antithesis is an SBR or SBS. Both are considered “other firearms” under the language of the Gun Control Act and they’re not covered by the NFA.

Here’s Franklin Armory’s statement . . .

Franklin Armory, one of America’s leading manufacturers of innovative firearms and accessories, and the Firearms Regulatory Accountability Coalition issued the following statement today regarding the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives Open Letter advising FFLs on the classification of Franklin Armory’s Reformation firearm:

Shortly after President Trump issued his executive order directing the Department of Justice to review and correct anti-Second Amendment abuses of power by previous administrations, DOJ and ATF abandoned their appeal of a Federal District Court Judge’s ruling in our favor that had rectified the misclassification of Franklin Armory’s Reformation firearm. While we were confident of another victory on appeal, fortunately, the current leadership at both DOJ and ATF proved to have more respect for legal principles than their predecessors and avoided further miring the parties into an even longer drawn-out legal battle.

This Open Letter formally reaffirms what we have known to be true all along: Reformation can only be classified as a standard “firearm” under the Gun Control Act and is completely exempt from the National Firearms Act. Furthermore, it is neither a short-barreled shotgun nor short-barreled rifle under the GCA.

Additionally, by the parties entering into this agreement, DOJ’s and ATF’s position on Reformation’s classification is now clear. This means that consumers nationwide—at least in free states— will continue to have unfettered access to the ultimate home defense weapon for protection of self, family, and property, free and clear of all NFA restrictions in the form of Franklin Armory’s Reformation series of firearms.

We are grateful to Attorney General Bondi and ATF Acting Director Driscoll for recognizing the validity of our case and appreciate their combined efforts to negotiate an agreement. Settling this case not only rights a wrong perpetrated against a constitutionally-protected business seeking nothing more than to engage in lawful commerce, but also helps to reestablish integrity and trust between industry and executive branch institutions.

The ATF’s Open Letter regarding Reformation was issued earlier today as a negotiated action in the recent settlement between Franklin Armory and co-plaintiff FRAC (Firearms Regulatory Accountability Coalition) and the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) and Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) in FRAC, et al. v. Bondi, et al. (formerly FRAC, et al. v. Garland, et al.) at the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals and the District of North Dakota.

Leave a Reply to Sam I Am Cancel Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

5 thoughts on “ATF Backs Down, Won’t Appeal Decision That Franklin Armory Reformation is a Standard, Non-NFA Firearm”

  1. This is what I have predicted was gonna happen . . . .

    Like the “sue and settle” tactics the left used to radically expand environmental and labor regulations, Trump 2.0 is going to take a knee in a lot of GOA / FPC / SAF cases. This will be the fastest way of undoing not only a lot of regulatory overreach but very probably some aspects of the ’68 GCA and maybe even the ’34 NFA.

    1. Don’t these “settlements” simply avoid the actual question at hand? Seems lacking a definitive judgement as precedent merely delays the matter, leaving govt free to come back like Christmas past.

  2. GOOD NEWS! One Of The Biggest Anti-2A Congressmen RETIRES! [note: maybe the fact that he was probably going to be primarie’d had something to do with his decision or maybe he could see the hand writing on the wall that the dems are gonna lose seats in the upcoming midterms making him even more irrelevant.]

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2UVA4fokduU

  3. Enough Is Enough! Bill Would Make Schools & Kids Safer! {note: repeal of the school gun free zones act. they should have done this years ago, all it did was act like a magnet for mentally ill killers. It was like a big sign that screamed “NO ONE HERE TO STOP YOU KILLER COME ON IN!]

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0f1GHtij3L0

    [now arm teachers and staff and train them, if they choose to be armed. Every time a school shooting happens these mentally ill monsters selected a school specifically because the gun-free zone thing meant it was very unlikely there would be anyone there to stop them and that’s why they selected the school targets they did, even the latest in Minnesota said in his ‘manifesto’ that’s why he selected that school.]

    1. We spent years trying it your way you stupid and evil anti-gun gun-controllers with the gun free zones, we law abiding people didn’t have any choice being, ya know, law abiding – and your way specifically got people killed with your gun free zones. You evil monsters, you promised people safety with a make believe force field of a gun free zone, that specially attracted over 95% of mass/school shooters – and like most everything you evil people say that promise of safety was a lie too. You passed laws establishing your gun free zones and in doing so you basically by law gave these mentally ill killers their own hunting grounds. You evil people didn’t provide any creditable stopping ability for the killers once they entered your gun-free zone, and your way ended up facilitating murder. You removed the ability for people to protect their selves and others against these mentally ill monsters that you activated and unleashed on the world when you rang that dinner bell called a gun-free zone.

      gun free zones, defined:

      “gun (gŭn) free (frē) zone (zōn)

      * Trap in which people congregate and are falsely promised safety by a make believe force field of a ‘No Guns” prohibition.

      * A place where people are disarmed and not permitted life saving self-defense with firearms.

      * Hunting grounds for violent predator criminals and mentally ill killers and mentally ill Trans killers and pedophiles and rapist, where defenseless prey is guaranteed by law.

      * Place where existing laws against violent crimes do not work to prevent violent crimes the laws are touted to be able to prevent.

      * Places designed to attract violent mentally ill predators.

      * Places where police forces cease to operate to protect before the fact of a violent crime as they are touted to be able to do by politicians implying.

      * Places Democrat politicians and anti-gun organizations and the Teachers Union use to attract violent mentally ill people to prey on and harm and kill your defenseless children.

Scroll to Top