Many of [Yeezy’s] designs can be found in massive, free online repositories, where anyone with an internet connection can download the design files necessary to print a weapon at home. In recent years, as well, 3D-printing technology has advanced significantly, with new machines capable of printing more durable, more precise weapons in less time than before. The technology has advanced so quickly, in fact, that its end result — untraceable weapons, assembled from spare parts and plastic frames — often confounds existing laws and presents a unique enforcement problem for authorities. In most states, it’s legal for anyone to build a firearm for personal use. Only seven states have outright banned 3D-printed weapons. There are caveats, of course — America’s gun laws are anything but consistent — but most 3D-printing gunsmiths operate within the letter of the law, carefully walking lines and navigating legal gray areas where applicable.
In the past, gunsmithing was a specialized skill. Creating a reliable, working firearm required years of technical study and access to complex machine shops. The plastic revolution has changed that, and law-enforcement sources and gun-control organizations maintain that 3D-printed weapons represent a new threat to public safety — extremists, criminals, or domestic abusers manufacturing traceless weapons with ill intent, children building functioning guns they see on social media, all with even less government oversight than America’s traditional firearms market. Unserialized and homemade firearms, opponents say, could easily allow criminals to bypass red-flag gun laws, which aim to prevent domestic abusers and other violent individuals from obtaining firearms. Authorities in California and New York have already brought lawsuits and legislation against online repositories of gun files like the ones Yeezy contributes to, and sought to crack down on the physical manufacture of weapons in their jurisdictions. It’s too early to tell if these measures will prevent what the authorities fear — but Yeezy and his compatriots are determined to keep printing regardless of the cost.
“This technology isn’t really driven by the street criminal,” says Bonnie Seok, an assistant district attorney for Manhattan who works in the office’s 3D-printed-gun unit. “It’s driven by an ideology — they’re dedicated to the Second Amendment and democratizing the process of being able to access your own guns. It’s driven by incredibly smart people. They’re always trying to defeat regulations. They’re always trying to outsmart law enforcement.”
The creators in this ecosystem represent a wide range of political views, from the far left to the far right, but almost all of them share a maximalist interpretation of the Second Amendment, in which the gun is the ultimate symbol of liberty: a tool, a weapon, and an inalienable right. Traditional gun enthusiasts have waged a running battle with the Department of Justice’s Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives for generations, but the 3D-printed revolution is a new, more polarized frontier. And some creators, like Yeezy, see their right to print guns as an essential bulwark against the darkest excesses of America’s current government. On social media, Yeezy describes himself as a “far left trantifa extremist,” combining the words “trans” and “antifa” for peak provocation, even though he is not transgender.
In simpler terms, Yeezy believes everyone, regardless of their identity, deserves the ability to buy, build, or carry whatever armament they want. But in Donald Trump’s America, Yeezy and many other creators, shooters, and activists no longer see that right as a given. Left-wing gun enthusiasts worry they may be the first to feel Trump’s boot, as his administration has declared “anti-fascist” groups to be domestic terrorists and stepped up efforts that may prevent specific groups, like transgender people, from owning firearms.
The solution, Yeezy thinks, is plastic: If the government tries to stop certain people from owning guns, 3D-printing technology means it is now easier than ever for them to just make their own.
— Jack Crosbie in This Man Wants to Help You Print Your Own Gun
It was never really about guns. It was always about ideology and tribalism.
1. The conservative right wing: “We support the Second Amendment and own guns for defense against tyranny and those that would want to kill or seriously injure us or our loved ones, and for sporting, hunting, and hobby.”
2. The far left wing: “We support the Second Amendment and own guns so people who imagine they are an opposite gender can murder those who disagree with them over anything, and hunt down and murder those who are not left wing. And our democrat politicians agree with that and have even recommended and promoted it.”
After you look into Yeezy a little bit you begin to realize # 2 is not really about the second amendment at all or even gun ownership. He’s all about mental illness and violence, while trying to make money from those trans he is trying to provoke to do such.
Yeezy has positioned himself as a trans rights activist and has a history of advocating for violence against what and whom he perceives as opposition to the transgender agenda. He describes himself as a “far-left trantifa extremist,” despite not being transgender himself.
Yeeze actively sells radical leftist extremist merchandise with slogans such as ‘The Second Amendment Is for Shooting Cops’ and ‘The Second Amendment Is for Shooting ICE, according to his website.
Yeeze conducts a ‘training course’ for trans and other far left wingers. They pay to take the course from this violent grifter. There are two courses actually – one teaches his version of gun use (which is gonna end up getting someone seriously injured or killed). The other is training trans for how to murder conservatives and children ’cause some way or another there is a ‘genocide of trans people’ going on or they are gonna also be rounded up by MAGA and put in concentration camps. There is no trans genocide, heck, everything you do not validate their imagination or sexual practices they scream its part of the ‘genocide’ (this is because they consider words ‘violence’ thus if you mis-gender them you are being violent so they can ‘defend’ their selves against your ‘violence’ and shoot you because you called a trans man ‘sir’ – yeah, these trans he trains believe that),. And if this nebulous MAGA were gonna round them up and put them in concentration camps it would have already started happening.
Shortly after Charlie Kirk was murdered Yeezy wrote in a September 2025 post on social media: ‘REST IN PISS CHARLIE KIRK.’ Other posts on his social media include ones saying [talking in reference to ANTIFA and Tyler Robinson and left wingers] ‘The people labeling you a domestic terrorist are all morally depraved pedophiles,’ ‘you can’t vote your way out of a fascist government,’ and ‘if the pigs start shooting you shoot back.’ and there is more where he openly advocates for murder of conservatives and christian and Jewish children.
Yeeze is not about the second amendment no matter how may times Rolling Stone wants to pretend he is or Yeeze claims it.
“In the past, gunsmithing was a specialized skill. Creating a reliable, working firearm required years of technical study and access to complex machine shops.” Not really. For example, Sten guns were slapped together in garage shops. In Pakistan they build full AKs with hand tools using coal forges. You don’t need a complex machine shop to create a firearm at all. And while it is a slow process, you can even make a rifled barrel the same way that they did it back in the 1800s. Plastic printing basically makes the frame. The internals are usually parts kits. But it has already been shown that you can go to a big box hardware store and buy everything that you need to make a submachinegun. All by yourself. With standard tools. (Known as the Luty).
Suppressors Are Protected Arms, Fifth Circuit Rules in Major 2A Case. [note: this creates a circuit split – the Ninth ignored Bruen and ruled that suppressors were not ‘arms’ under the second amendment.]
“In United States v. Brennan James Comeaux, the court affirmed Comeaux’s conviction for possessing an unregistered silencer under the National Firearms Act. That part is not the victory. The victory is what the court said on the way there: suppressors are ‘Arms’ protected by the Second Amendment.
…
The court explained that suppressors reduce loudness, lower the risk of hearing damage, reduce recoil, eliminate muzzle blast, increase accuracy, and allow faster follow-up shots. Suppressors make firearms safer, more controllable, and more effective for lawful self-defense. That is exactly why millions of gun owners want them.
The government argued that suppressors are not protected because a firearm can technically function without one and because suppressors were not historically tied to founding-era militia service. The Fifth Circuit said that is not the test. Under Bruen, an arm does not have to be “necessary” to make a gun fire. It must facilitate armed self-defense.
That is a massive rejection of the anti-suppressor narrative. …
…
Comeaux still lost because the panel said it was bound by United States v. Peterson, another Fifth Circuit suppressor case.
…”
ht* tps://www.ammoland.com/2026/06/fifth-circuit-suppressors-second-amendment-arms/
These violent far left winger ‘wanna be murderers’ always look like a villain Batman would beat up.