“Thomas’s brilliance in crafting ‘Bruen’ was to keep the standard to be the late 1700s as far as gun laws go.”
Correct…. but it was necessary and the reason it was necessary is because the ‘government’ (e.g. federal, state, county, local) (and courts) got out of control in assuming they had carte blanche over constitutional rights (not only the second but all of them). If the ‘government’ (and courts) can not act reasonably in addressing constitutional rights they need to be put back in their proper place, and SCOTUS did that with Bruen. Now, the ‘government’ (and courts), like defiant children after they get caught doing something they are not suppose to do, some of them continue to be defiant and like defiant children and throw their temper tantrums because they want their ‘carte blanche’ back to be able to do as they please with something that is not theirs.
It was necessary to go back to a time when the exercise of constitutional rights was as intended and clearly defined in what the founders intended in meaning and purpose and deed – that these are the rights of the people and government keeps their hands off in trying to control them or infringe them.
3 Responses
Thomas’s brilliance in crafting ‘Bruen’ was to keep the standard to be the late 1700s as far as gun laws go.
We are gonna have to fight them tooth and nail on this… 🙁
“Thomas’s brilliance in crafting ‘Bruen’ was to keep the standard to be the late 1700s as far as gun laws go.”
Correct…. but it was necessary and the reason it was necessary is because the ‘government’ (e.g. federal, state, county, local) (and courts) got out of control in assuming they had carte blanche over constitutional rights (not only the second but all of them). If the ‘government’ (and courts) can not act reasonably in addressing constitutional rights they need to be put back in their proper place, and SCOTUS did that with Bruen. Now, the ‘government’ (and courts), like defiant children after they get caught doing something they are not suppose to do, some of them continue to be defiant and like defiant children and throw their temper tantrums because they want their ‘carte blanche’ back to be able to do as they please with something that is not theirs.
It was necessary to go back to a time when the exercise of constitutional rights was as intended and clearly defined in what the founders intended in meaning and purpose and deed – that these are the rights of the people and government keeps their hands off in trying to control them or infringe them.
It’s like the standard Democrat position of, “if only we had more money. We could solve all of these problems.”
The amazing part is that voters continue to fall for it. Propaganda works.