Reality Check: The Courts Aren’t Coming to Save Your Gun Rights

supreme court

While many Americans still believe the courts are the key to restoring liberty, gun rights leaders say it’s time for a reality check — because the courts aren’t coming to save you. That’s the blunt warning from Hannah Hill, Vice President of the National Foundation for Gun Rights, who says far too many liberty activists have fallen into the trap of thinking they can sue their way back to freedom.

“No. The courts are NOT coming to save you,” Hill said in a recent statement. “If you’re waiting for a judge to fix this country, you’re going to be waiting forever.”

According to Hill, too many well-meaning conservatives are convinced that “one big lawsuit” will topple gun control laws or fix deep-rooted corruption, when in reality, the legal system is stacked against liberty from top to bottom.

Judges Don’t Follow the Law — They Follow Ideology

Hill, who has spent years fighting unconstitutional gun control statutes in the federal courts, says the hard truth is that many judges don’t rule based on the law, facts, or even the Constitution — they rule based on politics. “Many judges don’t rule on the facts. They don’t rule on precedent. They rule on what they want,” Hill said. “And here’s a newsflash: most judges do not want to uphold liberty.”

She added that the judiciary has become a closed system dominated by leftist law school ideology and elitism, even among some Republican appointees.

“Judges are a special category of political awfulness,” Hill said. “They come from the same indoctrination camps that teach moral relativism and contempt for individual rights. Once they’re in, you can’t remove them. They’re immune to public pressure and they know it.”

Supreme Court? Don’t Count on It

Hill also warned that pinning hopes on the Supreme Court is a losing game. Out of thousands of cases filed each year, the Court agrees to hear only a handful, and even the biggest constitutional challenges, like so-called “assault weapons” bans, can sit for years without action.

“Trying to get a Supreme Court case heard is like trying to shoot a mosquito with a cannon,” Hill said. “We’ve filed multiple challenges to deep-blue states’ gun bans and so far, the Court has said ‘no’ to every one. You could wait years, even decades, for a ruling that may never come.”

Meanwhile, unconstitutional laws remain in force, and gun owners are left footing the bill.

Lawsuits Are Slow, Costly, and Dangerous

Hill explained that serious litigation can cost five or six figures and take years to move through the system. When plaintiffs lose — which is often — they can even be forced to pay the opposition’s costs. And while lawyers rack up hours, bad laws continue to destroy lives.

“The courts move at the speed of molasses and the bill grows every month,” Hill said. “If you’re suing to overturn an AR-15 ban, that ban stays in place while you fight it — sometimes for years. Meanwhile, your state becomes a gun-free zone.”

Acknowledging Victories, But Staying Grounded

Hill and other gun rights leaders readily acknowledge that some lawsuits are both necessary and effective, and that groups like the National Foundation for Gun Rights and the Texas Gun Rights Foundation have seen recent victories in the courtroom. But, Hill warned, those wins are never guaranteed. And many of the same battles could be won faster and at far less cost through strong legislative fights.

That’s exactly why Texas Gun Rights is working day and night to stop bad laws before they’re passed — while the Texas Gun Rights Foundation brings the same tough-as-nails, “no compromise” strategy into the courts when necessary.

“We’ll fight them wherever they come for us — in the legislature or in the courtroom,” Hill said. “But we’ll never rely on judges to do what only organized patriots can.”

The Real Solution: Mobilize and Confront

Hill says the answer isn’t more lawsuits, it’s more political firepower. That means mobilizing the grassroots to confront legislators directly, not waiting for a judge to do it for them.

“The Founders never intended the courts to drive the nation’s policy,” Hill said. “They gave us the power to control the people who make the laws — we just have to use it.”

Hill emphasized that lawmakers — unlike judges — are terrified of angry voters. That’s where the movement’s real leverage lies.

“If you want change, don’t waste years filing briefs,” she said. “Build lists, raise money, knock on doors, and recruit primary challengers to punish politicians who sell out your rights. That’s how you win.”

Hill’s message to activists is as clear as it is uncompromising: the courtroom isn’t the battlefield — the legislature is. The courts can delay tyranny, but only the people can defeat it.

“Freedom isn’t saved by lawyers — it’s saved by patriots who refuse to bow,” Hill said. “If you’re serious about defending the Second Amendment, stop waiting for permission and start fighting like our Founders did: loud, relentless, and unafraid.”

 

Chris McNutt is president of Texas Gun Rights.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

11 thoughts on “Reality Check: The Courts Aren’t Coming to Save Your Gun Rights”

  1. trapped behind enemy lines

    How about the Justice Department’s civil rights division under Harmeet Dillon start treating violations of our 2nd amendment rights as civil rights violations and going after states, counties, cities, and other entities with investigations and consent decrees? Way faster than litigation or legislation. This administration keeps talking about how they are so supportive of the 2nd amendment, but their lack of action (and in some cases, their ACTIONS) say otherwise.

    1. How about sending what you have written here to Harmet at Civil Rights DOJ.

      Imagine if all the blog comments we read were to flood into the inboxes of those people who are in positions to get things done.

  2. Armed Citizen 2, Carjackers 0 in Seattle Shooting.

    “Shooting two armed would-be carjackers in downtown Seattle has earned kudos from hundreds of people, along with international attention from the Daily Mail, a publication based in the UK, with no sympathy at all for the two suspects who were still under police guard at the Harborview Medical Center.

    It was a scene which might be expected in an action thriller, but not so much in the Northwest’s most far-left metropolis, which appears to have just elected a so- cia-list female mayor. Self-defense advocates, firearms instructors and virtually every other legally-licensed citizen in the state—there are more than 711,000 of them in Washington, including more than 115,450 in King County, which encompasses Seattle—are watching this case closely to see how it unfolds, with many people fearing the 24-year-old good guy will face some kind of charge.

    However, under Washington State’s use-of-force statutes, the would-be victim appears to have acted well within legal parameters. That will be up to the King County Prosecutor’s office, which historically has never made a wrong call on a self-defense shooting, regardless of local politics. AmmoLand News checked with the Prosecutor’s office, and so far, it appears they are waiting for paperwork from investigators.

    According to KOMO News, the Seattle-based ABC affiliate, the incident unfolded at about 3:30 a.m. Sunday. The intended victim had parked his late-model Corvette on 1st Avenue and was approached by four masked suspects in a white sedan. Following a brief conversation, two of the suspects pulled guns and tried to steal the car. Instead, the would-be victim pulled his own legally-carried handgun and opened fire, hitting one suspect several times and wounding the second man, who fled with the other two suspects.
    …”

    https://www.ammoland.com/2025/11/armed-citizen-2-carjackers-0-in-seattle-shooting/

  3. For 15+ years I engaged in a letter writing campaign. Actual letters sent through the mail. Followed up with phone calls, never e-mail. E-mail is too easily dismissed, deleted, ignored.

    The recipients were sitting members of state and federal legislatures. Very few letters generated a response. Those responses were mostly the amnoying form responses. Some were what I consider antagonistic in that they got my position on a subject exactly wrong.
    Example: thanking me for being anti-gun whereas my letter clearly stated my support of RKBR.

    My phone calls to capitol and district offices yielded not much more than to let them know that I am still here and I am watching. Typically a woefully ignorant staffer answered. Then only to suggest I contact the captittlol office instead of the district office, or vice versa.

    So imagine how flummoxed I was when I joined mass e-mails sent out by various like minded groups. Wow! Incredible response. And none of those irritating games of twisting my words.

    Next, imagine the frustration of trying to get all who I met to engage yet only to be ignored. There is the root of every problem we have.

    If people would only get involved, the problems created by wayward politicians would disappear. Disappear.

    The graft, corruption, lawlessness are because The People (1st named institution, superior to all others) allow it.

  4. When was the last time anyone voted?

    Attended a city council meeting?

    Attended a school board meeting? And I will say you don’t have to have children. H.0″m^0;sezu@ls and @.th;eist;s who have no children. Attend these meetings all the time.

    The “gun community” is very lazy.

    Our form of government was created by individuals, who expected future generations to stay involved and stay informed. And we lost our way when we stopped doing that.

    The libertarians believe that freedom has no cost. They do really believe that freedom is “free”.

    Why it’s Ok to not vote.” Catherine Mangu Ward. A great libertarian. Video 50 min long.
    https://youtu.be/KSmBG1uU1ig?si=XHHdRBS9uFJsZ-t7

    And the many conservatives think this way too.

    I have never believed the American courts were my savior. When it came to keeping my civil rights.

    The Dred Scott vs Maria Sanford supreme court case is proof of that. When the court said tens of thousands of, born free black people, were not citizens and had no rights.

    The supreme court can easily say in a future case that the Second Amendment only applies to the national guard.

    And at least three SC judges actually believe that now.
    The c0m^m.muni:st and s*0;ci:@li”st pr0;gres%siv,e types are voting all the time.

    They use to think like the libertarians and not vote. But they have changed their minds.

    Now they vote all the time.

Scroll to Top