Same as it Ever Was: 2A Content Creators Getting Squeezed by Censorship, Decreased Ad Dollars

muzzle muzzled censor censored tape mouth

By Jenn Jacques

Originally created to automate tasks, analyze data and improve efficiency and accuracy in various applications, an adverse effect of artificial intelligence is silencing voices within the firearm industry. Firearm news sites and gun blogs have reported a decline in readership traffic due to several factors, one of which being search platforms using AI to divert traffic from independent websites.

AmmoLand previously reported, “Artificial intelligence search ‘snippets’ are blocking clicks to independent media. Search engines lift our reporting word-for-word, answer questions directly on their platforms, and leave fewer reasons for readers to visit the source. For pro-Second Amendment outlets, already fenced in by Big Tech’s ‘harmful content’ labels and age restrictions, this is a direct assault on our reach and revenue.”

It’s not like Second Amendment websites and gun blogs had it easy to begin with. With posts and pages being actively targeted on social media platforms to public WiFi networks blocking their websites, it’s harder than ever for independent blogs to reach audiences.

Big Tech Effect

Stephen Gutowski, founder and editor of The Reload, reported exclusively to NSSF that his site’s search traffic is down approximately 25 percent year-over-year, citing a correlation with the way Google has cannibalized search traffic with AI.

“There may be other factors at play, but I believe the effort to scan and reproduce reporting presents an existential threat to all media outlets,” Gutowski says. “Even those like The Reload that rely on subscriptions over ads to drive revenue.”

“Firearms media have always faced an uphill battle regarding visibility online,” Jacki Billings, editor-in-chief of Pew Pew Tactical, also told NSSF. “Recent algorithm shifts prioritizing AI-generated search snippets present a new challenge for our industry. Like others in the firearms space, we’re concerned about the impact.”

“Algorithm shifts and platform policies don’t just affect publishers; they hurt readers as well,” Billings continued. “When AI summaries replace clicks, the flow of information narrows and leaves people with less to work with when making decisions or learning about important issues. In short, when tech platforms limit access to information, readers pay the price.”

Industry Factors

Another factor affecting gun news blogs is reduced ad revenue as the firearm industry continues to scale back their collective advertising budgets due to slowing sales.

Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc. ended its full fiscal year April 30, 2025, reporting a decrease in net sales.

In a statement posted on the Smith & Wesson website, president and chief executive officer Mark Smith said, “Fourth quarter proved more difficult than we anticipated largely due to macro-economic and industry trends. Looking at the overall firearms market, we continue to see consumers generally being cautious due to macro-economic factors pressuring discretionary spending. While new products and lower price point offerings are still performing well, overall conditions suggest headwinds will likely persist in the near term.”

Sturm, Ruger & Company has also seen sales soften. In a statement on the Ruger website, president and chief executive officer Todd Seyfert said, “We know the market remains dynamic, and we expect to see continued challenges and potential consolidation across the industry throughout the remainder of this year. Yet, our realignment and our acquisition strengthen Ruger’s ability to respond, adapt and grow for the long term. We remain committed to our guiding principles: delivering rugged, reliable and innovative products, operating with financial discipline and creating long-term value for our shareholders.”

Softening and declining sales equals reduced ad budgets for firearm industry marketing teams, forcing them to drop smaller to mid-level gun blogs which frequently feature voices customers identify with.

Why are these websites important?

Mainstream media outlets – even independent and conservative-leaning media – don’t always get the whole story right when it comes to firearms. Firearms laws and the regulations surrounding the lawful commerce in arms are extremely complicated. Keeping up with the changes, especially after the years of punishing regulations by the Biden administration, is difficult.

Independent voices on these platforms provide unfiltered insight, expertise and depth of knowledge devoid of pundits’ bloviations and unspoiled by corporate censorship. Most of these writers are deeply rooted in their communities, frequenting many federal firearms licensees in their area and state, providing real-time feedback on how gun laws are affecting the retailers and gun owners they speak to.

That makes these news sources extremely important – not just to firearm enthusiasts but to media in general.

Finding Stable Ground

For most Second Amendment and firearm news sites, finding new ways to share content freely and reach new audiences has been an ongoing challenge. However, with AI search summarizing content without driving clicks, social platforms imposing biased restrictions on firearm content and industry ad revenue shrinking, independent gun media has been forced to rethink reach and revenue.

While some websites have felt a reprieve on alternative social media sites like Rumble, Gab and Substack with independent readers already migrating to such decentralized platforms, they are still missing out on reaching new readers and a more diverse audience.

And sadly, it doesn’t look like that will be changing any time soon.

 

Jenn Jacques is Public Affairs Manager at the National Shooting Sports Foundation

Leave a Reply to .40 cal Booger Cancel Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

4 thoughts on “Same as it Ever Was: 2A Content Creators Getting Squeezed by Censorship, Decreased Ad Dollars”

  1. Breaking: Jury Returns Verdict in Trial of Would-Be Trump Assassin Ryan Routh.

    “With everything else that’s been going on in the world, the trial of would-be Trump assassin Ryan Routh in the Southern District of Florida has flown a bit under the radar. The trial began on September 8 and has featured its fair share of oddness, given that Routh has opted to represent himself in the matter, though Judge Aileen Cannon ensured that standby defense counsel was a part of the proceedings as well.

    Routh stood trial for the following charges:

    Count I – Attempted Assassination of a Major Presidential Candidate
    Count II – Possession of a Firearm in Furtherance of a Crime of Violence
    Count III – Assaulting a Federal Officer
    Count IV – Felon in Possession of a Firearm and Ammunition
    Count V – Possession of a Firearm With an Obliterated Serial Number

    Count I, the most serious of the charges, is punishable by life in prison and required prosecutors to prove an intent to kill, and that the defendant took a “substantial step” towards committing the crime. Count II is also punishable by life in prison.

    Routh wrapped up his defense on Monday, and closing arguments were held on Tuesday morning. After less than three hours of deliberation and a request to see some of the physical evidence, including the rifle in question, the jury returned a verdict of guilty on all charges.
    …”

    https://redstate.com/smoosieq/2025/09/23/breaking-jury-returns-verdict-in-trial-of-would-be-trump-assassin-ryan-routh-n2194256

  2. Breitbart is suing over the AI issue.

    In the meantime, one way to bring more people in is to provide high quality photos in new gun reviews. People will search out the images. When they find what they’re interested in, they might click on the link.

  3. Well, according to the smartest, people in the room.The libertarians said that these are private companies and they can do as they wish.

    But when conservatives complained about these policies and said that the government was involved. The libertarians said there was no proof of government interference. They said conservatives were just assuming the government was interfering.

    Since the libertarians believed that the government would never interfere with private communications.

Scroll to Top