Talarico: I Totally Respect the 2A, But That Doesn’t Mean I Don’t Want to Outlaw AR-15s

Texas Rep. James Talarico (AP Photo/Talia Sprague)

James Talarico says he respects the Second Amendment. But when the Democratic candidate for U.S. Senate was recently asked whether a federal “assault weapons” ban remains on the table, his answer was clear:

“Absolutely.”

The answer comes as Talarico’s previous support for a sweeping list of gun control policies has resurfaced — and as some of the largest gun control organizations in the country line up behind his Senate campaign.

Talarico’s Gun Control Record

In a resurfaced 2020 video, Talarico laid out a list of gun control policies he said he was interested in “championing and working on.”

They included:

  • Universal background checks
  • Closing the so-called “gun show loophole”
  • An “assault weapons” ban
  • A ban on so-called “large-capacity” magazines
  • Restrictions on large firearm purchases
  • Government standards involving handgun design

Talarico also said the Second Amendment is not “unlimited” or “absolute” and argued that government can impose additional restrictions on the right to keep and bear arms.

Any question about whether Talarico had moved away from the most sweeping portions of that agenda was addressed during a September interview with NewsNation.

Host Leland Vittert asked whether Talarico could vote in the Senate for an “assault weapons” or large-capacity-magazine ban.

“Depending on the details of the legislation, yes,” Talarico responded.

Vittert followed up: Was an “assault weapons” ban still on the table?

“Absolutely,” Talarico said.

Talarico went on to argue that he supports the Second Amendment while also supporting what he calls “common sense gun safety measures.”

What an ‘Assault Weapons’ Ban Actually Targets

The terminology matters. Public discussion of “assault weapons” bans can blur the distinction between semiautomatic and fully automatic firearms. But an “assault weapons” ban isn’t simply a ban on fully automatic machine guns, which are already subject to extensive federal regulation.

AR-15-style rifles are semiautomatic, meaning they fire one round for each pull of the trigger. They’re not machine guns. Yet recent federal “Assault Weapons Ban” legislation has targeted sweeping categories of semiautomatic rifles, pistols and shotguns.

Under H.R. 3115, for example, a semiautomatic rifle capable of accepting a detachable magazine can fall under the proposed ban if it has just one of several common features, including a pistol grip, adjustable stock, barrel shroud or threaded barrel. The legislation also reaches numerous semiautomatic pistols and shotguns and specifically identifies entire families of firearms, including AR- and AK-type rifles and their copies, duplicates and variants.

In other words, these proposals are not aimed at machine guns. They’re bans aimed squarely at broad categories of ordinary semiautomatic firearms currently owned by Americans.

GIFFORDS and Everytown Are Backing Talarico

Talarico’s positions have also earned support from major national gun control organizations.

GIFFORDS formally endorsed his U.S. Senate campaign, praising his advocacy for expanded background checks, stronger firearm-storage requirements and raising the purchasing age for semiautomatic weapons. GIFFORDS says it expects Talarico to continue pursuing those policies nationally if elected.

Everytown for Gun Safety supported Talarico as well. During his Texas House career, Everytown included Talarico among the candidates it backed as part of its effort to build what the organization called a “Gun Sense Majority” in Texas.

The national gun control movement is also putting significant money into the 2026 elections. GIFFORDS recently launched a $10 million national midterm campaign, with initial spending in Michigan, Virginia and New Jersey and plans to expand into additional races. GIFFORDS Executive Director Emma Brown told Semafor that the organization intends to use the money to define Republicans it considers weak on gun policy and support Democrats it considers strong on the issue “across the map.”

Whether any portion of that money ultimately reaches Texas remains to be seen. But GIFFORDS has already endorsed Talarico and its leadership has made clear that it intends to expand its spending into races where it believes its message can have an impact. Texas is therefore a race worth watching as that spending develops.

Texans Should Know Where Candidates Stand

Candidates can describe their gun policies however they choose. Voters should look at the specific proposals they have supported, the statements they have made, and the records they have built.

Texas Gun Rights’ One Big Beautiful Ballot is designed to give voters another resource for reviewing where candidates stand on Second Amendment issues as the November election approaches.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

9 thoughts on “Talarico: I Totally Respect the 2A, But That Doesn’t Mean I Don’t Want to Outlaw AR-15s”

  1. Clarence Thomas: The Second Amendment Assumes a Right—It Does Not Grant One.

    ”
    …
    [video]
    Speaking with Senator Ted Cruz on the Verdict podcast, around minute 29, Thomas explained that the Constitution established the federal government, but it did not create the individual rights government was formed to protect.

    ‘The Second Amendment says the right to bear arms shall not be infringed,’ Thomas told Cruz. ‘It assumes a right. It doesn’t grant a right.’

    The exchange was recently highlighted in a video published by Colion Noir. It is a short statement, but it draws a clear line between the American understanding of liberty and the permission-based system demanded by the gun-control lobby.
    …”

    ht* tps://www.ammoland.com/2026/09/clarence-thomas-second-amendment-preexisting-right/

  2. Why is this race even close considering his many “progressive” comments that Texans find insulting? I asked AI to estimate lineage/support. Answer:

    Voters whose grandparents were all born in the USA (proxy for deeper multi-generational native stock; disproportionately non-Hispanic White, older, rural/suburban, evangelical-leaning):
    Paxton ~58–65% | Talarico ~30–38% (remainder undecided/other).

    Voters with any (or all) grandparents foreign-born (proxy for more recent immigrant heritage; disproportionately Hispanic, Asian, urban/suburban, younger on average):
    Talarico ~52–60% | Paxton ~35–42%.

    Do you people get it yet? Immigration is the only way Dems continue to win or even have a chance.

  3. Continuation of previous comment waiting on mod…

    Talarico’s strength among Hispanics (recent polls: ~54% Talarico / 36% Paxton), Black voters (very large Talarico margins), younger voters, and urban areas. Naturalized citizens and U.S.-born children/grandchildren of immigrants lean more Democratic overall than multi-generation natives, though Texas Hispanics have shown some rightward movement in recent cycles and are not monolithic. Asian-American voters (significant in Texas metros) also lean Democratic on average.

    I was reading “demographics are destiny” articles back in Obama’s first term. It’s wild how many people continue to overlook this.

  4. James Talarico’s Lesbian Minister Just Outed Him.

    “For weeks, Republicans have accused Texas State Rep. James Talarico (D-50th District) of faking a rightward shift on transgender issues to win a statewide race. Now the public doesn’t have to take our word for it.

    Why? His own pastor just confirmed it.
    …”

    ht* tps://pjmedia.com/matt-margolis/2026/09/16/james-talaricos-lesbian-minister-just-outed-him-n4957312

    [note: Talarico is a liar and fraud, for everything 2A or not. His claim of ‘Totally Respect the 2A’ is a lie. He has zero respect for the Constitution and constitutional rights. He has been trying to to rebrand himself to attract voters, this rebrand its self is a lie and fraud.]

  5. ‘Abused His Office’: Paxton Slams Talarico Over Corruption Scandal.

    ”
    …
    BREAKING: James Talarico abused his office to enrich himself and his employer. He needs to answer for his corruption and explain to taxpayers why he used their tax dollars to benefit himself and the woke DEI firm paying him tens of thousands of dollars. https://t.co/TdX67eCec1

    — Attorney General Ken Paxton (@KenPaxtonTX) September 17, 2026
    …”

    ht* tps://pjmedia.com/catherinesalgado/2026/09/17/paxton-reacts-to-talaricos-corruption-scandal-n4957355

  6. Hackers Reveal the Terrifying Truth About the Flock Surveillance State.

    ht* tps://townhall.com/news/jeff-charles/2026/09/18/hackers-reveal-the-terrifying-truth-about-the-flock-surveillance-state-n2683175

  7. Beto 2.0.

    Beto O’Rourke: “I respect the second amendment.” (yes, he actually said this)

    Beto O’Rourke: “Hell, Yes, We’re Going To Take Your AR-15, Your AK-47.” (yes, he actually said this)

Scroll to Top