While the Supreme Court Percolates, More States Advance Hardware Bans
Anti-gun goal posts are always moving, and the work of anti-gun legislators is never done.
Anti-gun goal posts are always moving, and the work of anti-gun legislators is never done.
AGs of three anti-gun states filed a motion seeking to intervene, as they bizarrely phrase it, “to provide the Second Amendment defense that no other party currently will.”
Inevitably, having spoken his mind and experiencing the effect his unedited thoughts had on the broader world outside his political bubble, Mayor David LaGrand was forced to backtrack.
The relevant conduct and hardware are already covered by the law. What this latest legislation seeks to ban is the more metaphysical concept of potentiality.
The goal is to use the threat of devastating civil liability to force the firearms industry to restrict their rights and those of their customers by instituting gun controls that were not enacted through the democratic process.
Concerns over AI’s veracity, reliability and lack of viewpoint diversity will only increase as dependence on AI as a source of instant information and a shortcut to doing research grows.
Astute Virginia gun owners anticipated terrible gun control legislation from the 2026 General Assembly. Still, some may be shocked to
After oral arguments in Wolford v. Lopez, the Hawaii “vampire rule” litigation, and Aloha State lawmakers have already been panicked into an attempt at a preemptive legislative workaround.
The rule comes at a time when states are increasingly liberalizing their regulation of marijuana and as a Second Amendment challenge to the underlying statute looms at the U.S. Supreme Court.
The DOJ Office of Legal Counsel subjected 18 U.S.C. § 1715 to the proper Second Amendment analysis outlined in the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in the NRA-supported case New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. Bruen.