Facts Don’t Lie, But Anti-Gun Democrats Do Whenever the Subject is Silencers
Antigun politicians in Washington, D.C., must be getting nervous that provisions to remove unnecessary suppressor regulations – or at least […]
Mexico’s amorphous theory of liability is seriously in question after the Smith & Wesson decision. As was true in that case, Mexico’s allegations in the Arizona lawsuit likewise constitute a generalized complaint about how firearms are sold in the US.
Antigun state governors tout their “leadership” and push to pass more gun control, but they ignore flaws in crime reporting data while dismissively ignoring law-abiding Americans using firearms in self-defense to deter criminals.
Chalk one up for the firearm industry. Citgroup, one of the largest corporate banking institutions in the nation, announced it is changing its financial services policies that boxed out members of the firearm and ammunition industry.
In fact, it wasn’t just the ATF that the Biden administration weaponized against the firearm industry. It was nearly every facet of government that was turned against the firearm and ammunition manufacturers, distributors, exporters and importers.
U.S. Sen. Adam Schiff (D-Calif.) replaced the late U.S. Sen. Dianne Feinstein (also D-Calif.) and has picked up the mantle
After the illegal practice was ended under the first Trump administration, banks and special interests privatized the scheme by adopting policies that specifically denied businesses financial services because they make and sell firearms.
Veterans Affairs Committee Chairman Bost laid out why military veterans shouldn’t be forced to make the difficult decision between seeking needed health benefits and keeping their Second Amendment rights.
Mexico, apparently, views sovereignty as a one-way street. American assistance in fighting narco-terrorism is out of the question, but arguing in the Supreme Court that US gun rights must comport with Mexican “norms” is just fine.
None of this is new to the firearm industry. For decades, it’s been caught in that ongoing tension between those who write the laws, those who enforce the laws, and those who decide if those laws are aligned with the U.S. Constitution.