<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Apex Optics Vapor 1-4X Variable Prism Sight	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.shootingnewsweekly.com/optics/apex-optics-vapor-1-4x-variable-prism-sight/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.shootingnewsweekly.com/optics/apex-optics-vapor-1-4x-variable-prism-sight/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2026 23:41:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8.8</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: .40 cal Booger		</title>
		<link>https://www.shootingnewsweekly.com/optics/apex-optics-vapor-1-4x-variable-prism-sight/comment-page-1/#comment-201366</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[.40 cal Booger]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2026 23:41:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.shootingnewsweekly.com/?p=42928#comment-201366</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.shootingnewsweekly.com/optics/apex-optics-vapor-1-4x-variable-prism-sight/comment-page-1/#comment-201365&quot;&gt;.40 cal Booger&lt;/a&gt;.

&quot;Parallax Fixed at 100 yd&quot;

For the BDC and subtends to be accurate you need to be zero&#039;d at 100 yards and zoomed to 4x. I wonder if this is why they &#039;Parallax Fixed at 100 yd&#039;.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.shootingnewsweekly.com/optics/apex-optics-vapor-1-4x-variable-prism-sight/comment-page-1/#comment-201365">.40 cal Booger</a>.</p>
<p>&#8220;Parallax Fixed at 100 yd&#8221;</p>
<p>For the BDC and subtends to be accurate you need to be zero&#8217;d at 100 yards and zoomed to 4x. I wonder if this is why they &#8216;Parallax Fixed at 100 yd&#8217;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: .40 cal Booger		</title>
		<link>https://www.shootingnewsweekly.com/optics/apex-optics-vapor-1-4x-variable-prism-sight/comment-page-1/#comment-201365</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[.40 cal Booger]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2026 23:24:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.shootingnewsweekly.com/?p=42928#comment-201365</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[For the price, the QD mount should be provided as standard in the box at no extra cost. The provided factory pic mount is sort of kinda, reminds me of, &#039;China budget-class&#039; stuff on Amazon.  Its not mini ACOG pattern mount compatible like they promised it would be at show. The glass is good though, but its nothing different than what you can already find on decent LPVO&#039;s. It doesn&#039;t have shake-awake or auto off, ya would think this being pretty standard in 2026 would be a hint for $900.00&#039;ish. Although being a prism variable is somewhat unique, its about on par with lower cost LPVO&#039;s.

It is decent for a first gen direct from prototype to manufacturing, but I think its over priced by about $300.00 - $400.00]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For the price, the QD mount should be provided as standard in the box at no extra cost. The provided factory pic mount is sort of kinda, reminds me of, &#8216;China budget-class&#8217; stuff on Amazon.  Its not mini ACOG pattern mount compatible like they promised it would be at show. The glass is good though, but its nothing different than what you can already find on decent LPVO&#8217;s. It doesn&#8217;t have shake-awake or auto off, ya would think this being pretty standard in 2026 would be a hint for $900.00&#8217;ish. Although being a prism variable is somewhat unique, its about on par with lower cost LPVO&#8217;s.</p>
<p>It is decent for a first gen direct from prototype to manufacturing, but I think its over priced by about $300.00 &#8211; $400.00</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
