Get your own blog, and stop polluting this one, asswipe… 🙁

”
…
… The act forces landlords to offer their property to the city as well as nonprofits before the building can be sold on the public market.
…
‘COPA will make New York City an affordable housing wasteland and trigger the extinction of small owners. This government-engineered scheme sanctions politically connected, nonprofit housing slumlords and predatory developers to snatch private property at depressed values from hard-working small owners, many immigrants’ multigenerational families that have invested their blood, sweat, and life savings in their buildings. Socialization of housing is just the beginning.’
…”

ht* tps://thepostmillennial.com/nyc-poised-to-force-landlords-to-sell-private-property-to-non-profits-to-ensure-affordable-housing?utm_campaign=64470

[note: This is ‘unlawful taking’ to be forced to do this, even if ‘under fairy dusted pretend color of law’, and a constitutional violation. Its akin to ‘forced property confiscation’]

ht* tps://thepostmillennial.com/nyc-poised-to-force-landlords-to-sell-private-property-to-non-profits-to-ensure-affordable-housing?utm_campaign=64470

ht* tps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iw9gvXReN6U

ht* tps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DrypkJTzHl8

Here we go again, and like clockwork, DOJ is all in on defending the NFA, even for those items moving to $0.00 taxation next week. Washington Gun Law President, William Kirk, discusses the matter of Brown v. ATF, one of two major challenges to the NFA’s application to the now untaxed items. For the second time now, DOJ has gone all in and filed their own motion for summary judgment asking that the Eastern District of Missouri strike this challenge down. This DOJ has done some pretty good things for gun owners nationwide, but their strange infatuation with all aspects of the NFA remains one of their most troubling habits.

ht* tps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8Gs1cf_cCm4

“This [Illinois] true crime story exposes one of the most dangerous forms of junk science still used in American courtrooms: ballistics and forensic firearm identification.
…
For decades, police, prosecutors, and so-called forensic experts have testified with absolute certainty that a single bullet or shell casing could be matched to a specific gun ‘to the exclusion of all others.’ This video reveals how that claim is not science at all—and how it has destroyed innocent lives.
…
At the center of this case is Patrick Pursley, a man sentenced to life in prison based almost entirely on ballistics testimony. No DNA. No fingerprints. No eyewitness identification. Just a confident expert telling a jury that the bullets from a crime scene matched a gun with 100% certainty. This is a textbook example of junk science in criminal law, and it highlights a growing crisis in forensic evidence, police investigations, and crime scene analysis.
…
This video breaks down:
• How ballistic “fingerprints” are claimed to work
• Why firearms identification lacks scientific validation
• How police and forensic labs present opinion as fact
• The role of crime labs in wrongful convictions
• Why courts are beginning to challenge forensic testimony
…”

ht* tps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2Cwbx6b5I0E

ht* tps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oHPBdDupuBc

ht* tps://townhall.com/tipsheet/dmitri-bolt/2025/12/29/bystander-at-bondi-beach-who-disarmed-terrorist-gives-first-interview-since-the-attack-n2668582